• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

the social network on rottentomatoes

This is a terrible idea for many, many reasons. I'll list them.

1. No one cares about facebook anymore. This movie would have made a lot more if they made it in 2007, when facebook was at its prime. Now everyone is just sick of it. Stupid applications, privacy violations, annoying layout changes. The novelty has worn off and frankly, no one cares to even use it, let alone learn about it. I would liken this to making a movie about the guy who invented the buggy whip, to steal from Other People's Money.

Prehaps you and I are in different social circles but here Facebook is pretty much at it's prime. If there was a time it was "most popular" and hit a peak I would say Summer 2010. EVERYONE has one now and EVERYONE is on it every day for the most part.

Here in 2007 Facebook was very niche still and everyone still by far preferred MySpace. It wasn't until 2009 that Facebook overtook MySpace with my friends and acquaintances.

So this is pretty much perfect timing for such a movie. Now am I going to see it? Probably not.
 
The Social Network is the best film of the year.

Saying it's a movie about Facebook, especially without ever seeing it, is ignorance at it's finest.

The film is Fincher at his prime.
 
I wouldn't say it was the best film of the year, especially since the year is not over. However, The Social Network is an extraordinarily compelling film with great performances, a fantastically written script and superb direction. Definitely one of the best films of the year at this point.
 
What's with all the dumping towards The Pirates of Silicon Valley? It's a terrific account of the early days of Windows and Microsoft and a lot like The Social Network in may ways.

But speaking OT, I just saw the film and thought it was excellent. It's not the second coming that a few quote-whores in the movie reviewing business would have you believe, but it's well-acted (including Justin Timberlake, who surprised the hell out of me), well directed, and well written (perhaps Sorkin's finest feature film to date). One of the better films I've seen this year, and an A.
 
Saw it tonight with my ladyfriend. We both thoroughly enjoyed it.

Given that I tend to be in relationships with people who have wildly different tastes in entertainment than my own, I'm always impressed and pleased when a film can do that.

A+
 
It's nice to finally be able to enjoy a movie as much as the general public. I really couldn't think of anything wrong with this movie when it was over, something very rare for someone so inclined towards nitpicking and over analyzing when it comes to movies. I loved the cast from top to bottom, the writing, the direction, and the music (which I usually don't pay much attention to in movies). I didn't expect to care much for the music. I got this idea that rock musician scores are always going to be irritatingly distracting and self-indulgent since the Radiohead guy's score for "There Will Be Blood" annoyed the hell out of me, but the Trent Reznor co-written score was awesome.

I felt like I was watching a lot of star making performances. I've seen Eisenberg in lots of things, but he brought his game way up in this one. I love how ambiguous his character was, due to the writing and his acting. I didn't find him especially heroic or villainous (despite the many hilarious douche-y remarks) and thought this made him fascinating. In the end, I couldn't really make up my mind about whether the character was a cold, overambitious, insensitive and selfish asshole or simply a social misfit who means well, but is insensitive only because he doesn't know any better (this is why I'm finding the reviews speculating about him having a bit of Asperger's syndrome intriguing).

Andrew Garfield and Justin Timberlake were revelations too. I'm totally sold on Garfield as Spider-Man now. He conveyed earnestness and thoughtful, responsible resolve beautifully, and I think his ability to embody those qualities so well could serve him well as Spider-Man. I read one review comparing this movie to "The Godfather" and could not imagine how a movie about Facebook could earn such a comparison, but with the betrayal of Garfield's character, I saw it. My favourite moment is when he storms up to Zuckerberg in the Facebook office. It reminded me of "I knew it was you, Fredo".

This movie was brilliant. I liked it a lot more than "Inception", which I just couldn't get on the bandwagon for, as much as I wanted to like it the way everyone else did. I was wary about watching a Facebook movie being someone who doesn't use or care much about it, but what I desire most in movies is juicy acting and dialog and this movie has it in spades more than any other modern movie I've seen in a long time. It's smart, entertaining, and relevant. I think it will be respected over time as an excellent portrait of the distinct moral and technological state of society at this exact moment in time. That's why its predicted eventual status as one of the most important movies of the decade does not seem far-fetched to me. BELIEVE THE HYPE.
 
I really enjoyed this film but that wasn't much of a surprise to me. David Fincher is one of the best current directors (up there with Christopher Nolan, Darren Aronofsky and Wes Anderson) and Aaron Sorkin always writes amazing dialogue. One of the best films of the year after Inception and Toy Story 3.
 
I'd have to say the best films of the year for me so far are;

The Social Network
The American
Inception

However, there's still True Grit, Tron: Legacy and a handful of others to come out.
 
Looooooved it! Easily the darkest thing Sorkin's written yet. And while I do think it should have carried a pre-movie disclaimer, acknowledging liberties taken with the histories of living people (as Oliver Stone did with Nixon), I'm thrilled that with Charlie Wilson's War, The Farnsworth Invention, this, and the upcoming Jon Edwards movie, Sorkin seems to be moving into historical dramatization for good, as that's one of my favorite genres/types. I only wish he wasn't directing the Edwards movie also, as many can direct what he writes, but hardly anyone can write like he does.


slated.jpg
 
That's just bloody hilarious! I finally had a chance to see the film this past week and thought it was brilliant. Top three favorite film of the year so far and will probably end up finishing in my top five. Andrew Garfield was what really impressed me the most out of the cast, he's going to make an excellent Peter Parker, after watching him in "The Social Network" you get a sense of why he was chosen. Jesse Einsenberg I think erased any allusions to Michael Cera with his performance as well. Armie Hammer as well was great. I think that if "Inception" didn't come out this year this would be my favorite film of the year. I loved the score as well. This is going to be a must buy DVD for me.
 
This was a great movie. Really well done. Great performances all around, and well written and directed. I particularly liked the soundtrack. My understanding of history is that there's a fair bit of sensationalizing going on with some of the personal storylines between Zuckerberg and women, for instance, but the legal stuff is more or less true. Eisenberg was great as he was in Zombieland. Timberlake was kind of a revelation, I remember thinking during the movie "that guy looks kind of like justin timberlake" but dismissing it because of the actual good acting I was seeing. Afterwards I checked the cast and lo and behold.

Extra credit for making what, to be honest, isn't THAT compelling of a plot, into a tour de force. Sorkin deserves some kudos here. Incidentally, I would have liked to have seen a little more of Facebook the company, but I get the core story was about Zuckerberg and not the company per se.

Directing, writing, and acting, just an example of really solid film-making. It has the solid competent well-cooked feel that I get from, say, a Christopher Nolan movie. I mean David Fincher is a great director so I shouldn't be too surprised by this, but it is just kind of rare to get a movie that hits all its notes perfectly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This was the best part:

JESSE EISENBERG
Andrew, I’m moving to California to hang out with Justin Timberlake because he’s cool and has short curly hair and fucks women with impossibly perfect asses.

:lol:
 
I liked this part:

JESSE EISENBERG

Oh. Well maybe we need some heavy-handed shots of me looking all frowny to make the audience feel bad for me even though I spent the whole movie being an asshole.

FACEBOOK immediately goes into DAMAGE CONTROL MODE by putting ZUCKERBERG’S FACE in every possible MAGAZINE and TV SHOW so that the AUDIENCE assumes his lack of resemblance to JESSE EISENBERG means he’s not an INSUFFERABLE DOUCHEBAG.
 
I hope nobody comes away from the movie thinking it's an accurate portrayal of anything (or anyone.) It's entertainment, and as such it took basic kernels of truth and dramatized the hell out of them. Mark Zuckerberg probably is a douchebag, but most likely not to the degree The Social Network makes him out to be.

Likewise, Sean Parker is most probably not a paranoid and slightly psychotic party animal. But it makes for an interesting movie.

I hope the real Eduardo Saverin isn't as much of a clueless dweeb as the movie makes him out to be, though. :p
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top