Spoilers The Ships of Lower Decks

Discussion in 'Star Trek: Lower Decks' started by Tuskin38, Aug 6, 2020.

  1. XCV330

    XCV330 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2017
    Location:
    XCV330
    when you have gravity plating and elevators, define practical?
     
    Noah_23 and Manticore like this.
  2. Tim Thomason

    Tim Thomason Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 27, 2009
    Location:
    USS Protostar
    Unlike the Galaxy, which was explicitly built as two ships-in-one, the California seems to have placed everything but Engineering, probably, in the saucer (lots of Ops). I don't think the have a battle bridge, per se, but can probably separate the saucer in order to blow up the warp core (and nacelles) if they need to, with minimal loss of life in a fast emergency, since there's very few officers stationed in that section and probably no living quarters down there.
     
  3. Nerys Myk

    Nerys Myk A Spock and a smile Premium Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2001
    Location:
    AI Generated Madness
    [​IMG]
     
    XCV330 and 137th Gebirg like this.
  4. Kpnuts

    Kpnuts Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 1999
    Very good point
     
  5. Ronald Held

    Ronald Held Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Location:
    On the USS Sovereign
    "always been around" could mean from around TNG?
     
    Sci and F. King Daniel like this.
  6. NCC-73515

    NCC-73515 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2019
    Location:
    SoCal
    The less glamorous ships have smaller windows ;)
     
    F. King Daniel and Ronald Held like this.
  7. publiusr

    publiusr Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Location:
    publiusr
    Looks wider and more shallow...I like it
     
  8. Michael

    Michael Good Bad Influence Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2007
    Location:
    Aloha Quadrant
    At first I thought those two dark grey squares on top of the saucer were extensions of the nacelle struts going all the way through the saucer section, but seeing the ship from behind reveals that they actually don't line up.

    I wonder what exactly they are, though.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  9. 137th Gebirg

    137th Gebirg Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2000
    Location:
    Eaten by Cannibals
    I thought the same thing. I have no idea what those are for. The MSD doesn’t give any clues as to their purpose.
     
  10. Michael

    Michael Good Bad Influence Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2007
    Location:
    Aloha Quadrant
    Well, I guess there's a good chance that they're OPS. ;)
     
    Lexomatic, penguin44, XCV330 and 4 others like this.
  11. 137th Gebirg

    137th Gebirg Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2000
    Location:
    Eaten by Cannibals
  12. valkyrie013

    valkyrie013 Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2009
    Hard points for...
    Weapons, sensors, Winnebagos?

    Probably just a sensor thingy. First thought was a navagational deflector like the reliant which this ship was mildly based.
     
    Michael likes this.
  13. matthunter

    matthunter Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2004
    Location:
    Great Britain
    Sexy bumps.
     
    marillion likes this.
  14. valkyrie013

    valkyrie013 Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2009
    Quite ample nacelles.. :guffaw:
     
  15. Phil123

    Phil123 Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    May 18, 2017
    Location:
    London
    I really like it. Sure, the star drive location isn’t the most logical, but it’s a good, simple, clean lined design that’s instantly recognisable as both Star Trek and its own identity. I’m glad to see design go simple again. The disco ships - some are cool but few have pleasing or identifiable silhouettes. I would love to serve on a California class!
     
    Noah_23 and XelosTi like this.
  16. DaveyNY

    DaveyNY Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Location:
    DaveyNY from Skin-Neck-Ta-Dee (Schenectady)

    Maybe they are extensions of the struts, but the animation dept. screwed up the shot??
    Cause that top pic does seem to indicate such.

    Or maybe the struts angle up and out once they enter the primary hull?
    (to avoid using up prime space in the center of the hull?)
     
  17. Nerys Myk

    Nerys Myk A Spock and a smile Premium Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2001
    Location:
    AI Generated Madness
    Squash courts.
     
    saddestmoon likes this.
  18. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    Zero g tennis? Yes, please .
     
  19. Timo

    Timo Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    If the ship is going to launch torpedoes in an adventure, she's lacking in forward surfaces suited for that. The pod down below and these two bumps are the only places where such surfaces aren't covered in portholes or other things that glow all wrong for torp tubes. And while neither the pod nor these bumps actually seem to feature holes we could identify as torp tubes, the pod front end is almost completely taken up by the deflector and has fairly narrow strips of useful frontal real estate otherwise.

    Okay, we also have the very top of the saucer, the front of the superstructure - perhaps that grey letterboxish opening there is not a bridge window? :devil:

    Timo Saloniemi
     
  20. matthunter

    matthunter Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2004
    Location:
    Great Britain
    They deploy the Argo buggies via a big trebuchet.