If you didn't like T/B as a couple, what pairing would you have preferred?
It has nothing to do with 'what pairing I would have preferred." I don't care about 'pairing.' I don't watch Star Trek to see if Crewman X hooks up with Crewman Y.
If you didn't like T/B as a couple, what pairing would you have preferred?
It has nothing to do with 'what pairing I would have preferred." I don't care about 'pairing.' I don't watch Star Trek to see if Crewman X hooks up with Crewman Y.
I must inform yo that the post you quoted which starts with the words The success of the Seven of Nine character has nothing whatsoever to do with the catsuit was not a quote from my post but a reply from Jeremy LH to one of my posts. I inform that just to avoid any misunderstanding.Seven was easy to like because of fans love and appreciation for the Borg; also it was an opportunity for the showrunners to bond GOAT Janeway and 7's camaraderie and ape off the character intricacies of Kirk and Spock and movie versions of Picard and Data.
Kes was an alien from outer space. If people had an issue with her age then I am having trouble with these same people who call themselves Star Trek fans and don't have a clue the barriers this franchise had broken through. HELLO - it's STAR TREK!!!
As do I. Kes was a civilian, but her outfits were flattering without looking like they were painted on.
Seven sacrifice herself for the good of the crew would have worked, if done right. But, I saw no reason why it was necessary. Indeed, if one character didn't get home, I think that Janeway was the natural choice. Remember her three rules?
My issues with Seven's catsuit lie largely with the fact that it had a built-in corset, and Jeri Ryan had trouble breathing while wearing it. No one should have to work under those conditions.![]()
7 of 9 wasn't popular because of the catsuit. The catsuit was the product of the frat-boy mentality of Brannon Braga and the UPN suits who were his bosses (and which was carried over into ENT with T'Pol.) They were catering to the lowest common denominator audience-wise with that ridiculous outfit. It served no logical purpose in the show (other than some paper-thin BS about how it helped her function or something.)
No, the character of 7 of 9 was popular because the actress who played her was able to transcend beyond the silly costume and actually act well. She would have been popular if they'd have just kept her Borg implants on. Hell, she would have been popular if they gave her a garbage bag to wear.
I think you're shortchanging Tom. He was actually a good character at first, and I enjoyed his guy-palling with Harry in the holodeck. But then the writers caught "Monica & Chandler" disease and stuck him with Belanna, and his interesting qualities went down the tubes.
were parings really needed? None of them made much sense to me on the show. Chakotey and Seven made no sense at all. Paris and B'lanna made sense in the sense of two people with sexual drives and few dating options but it wasn't interesting. Neelix and Kes was always going to be creepy. About the only pairing I might have understood would have been 7 and the Doctor. Maybe Kim and Torres.
I'm of the opinion that that's probably not true. I'm guessing that you just don't watch or give much thought to shows with characters you don't buy. For example, I can't imagine that you (or anyone else) ever saw an episode of Homeboys in Outer Space and actually bought the characters (or anything else about the show).
And that was the case with me. I just stopped watching Voyager. Again, it wasn't until years later, in 2019, that I actually watched through the Voyager series.
I watched through it specifically because Seven of Nine turned up on the advertisements for the ST: Picard series and I wanted to familiarize myself with the character. I, at first, watched the series premier and then skipped to the last episode of season three and watched seasons four through seven from there. After I did that, I went back and watched the whole series from season one onward. I was able to do that because the later seasons with Seven sold me on the series in a way that the earlier seasons never did.
I watched ST: Picard all the way to the episode where Seven of Nine finally shows up and never watched another episode. My loss of interest in the series followed a similar (though not identical) trajectory as watching Voyager the first time. In this case, though, it wasn't so much a matter of rejecting the character(s) for not being 'real' so much as rejecting the entire series for not being Star Trek.
The series right from the start was breaking away from the long established ST formula and any time the production does something like that, it arouses a certain suspicion in the audience that the production might not know what they are doing. Seven finally makes her appearance in the series and it's not the same character that we are familiar with. It's a completely different character that we don't know anything about but just so happens to be played by the same actress. And so, like 'Threshold', the episode confirms our suspicions that the production doesn't know what they are doing.
Off on a tangent, my brother and I both consider ST: Nemesis to be among the best of the ST movies but the movie is counted among the worst by the larger ST fan base. My brother's theory is that the reason is that Nemesis (much like Picard) doesn't actually follow any of the standard ST formula for movies in the way that it was directed and that it would have faired much better if it had been a stand alone movie or part of a different franchise.
I wouldn't have bought a pairing between the Doctor and anyone else because he was a computer program. .
I must admit that I never even heard of Homeboys In Outer Space.
As for characters, if I don't like the characters in a series, then I don't watch it. One of the main reasons I stopped watching Enterprise is that I found all the characters except Trip Tucker and Porthos bland and boring, OK I was against a retro series from the start and the way it looked on screen (not even close to TOS) plus the fact that they were constantly messing up accepted Trek history in it and that I couldn't stand seeing bermman's and Braga's names turn up on the screen (after what happened in that season 6 episode of Voyager) but the bland characters was one of the main reasons I stopped watching it after five episodes.
The same for Star Trek Discovery. I quit watching that after three episodes because I found the whole series dull and gloomy, the characters miserable and most of all because of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle "Klingons" which they have in the series, another example of some idiot producer who just have to put his (or her) mark on the series.
I don’t mind gloomy. It’s the ’dull‘ part that I have a problem with.There are other series outside Star Trek I've stopped watching for the same reasons. Bad characters or character destruction.
I still watch Picard occasionally, only because it's Star Trek 24th century series, Picard and some TNG characters shows up and for some weird hope that it will change to the better. But honestly, I find it dull and gloomy too. As for Seven, she's the only positive thing that happened in that series.
It's ironic, isn't it? I really loathed Seven once. Now I find her the best character on Picard!
As for Nemesis, there were many things I didn't like in it so it's not one of my favorite movies.
What really ruined it for me was that they killed off Data. How rude and unnecessary!
Linx, btw, I don’t believe it ever came down to Kes or Harry Kim either. The production wanted a low man on the totem pole type character and wanted to keep the same guy so that they wouldn’t have to recast the part with a new character and actor or actress. Garrett Wang just misunderstood the situation. Even though they told him straight out.
They were never going to either fire him or give him a promotion.
If Wang had been more ballsy about it like Robert Beltran, they might have started paying out to him like they did Beltran. That’s why they just let him go on thinking they didn’t like him. It was less expensive that way.
They refused to even let him direct, which goes beyond normal plans.
And it was so unnecessary. Kate Mulgrew was more than capable of playing a human character with human vulnerabilities. And she would still have been a great captain.
I don’t believe it ever came down to Kes or Harry Kim either. The production wanted a low man on the totem pole type character and wanted to keep the same guy so that they wouldn’t have to recast the part with a new character and actor or actress. Garrett Wang just misunderstood the situation. Even though they told him straight out.
They were never going to either fire him or give him a promotion.
The "low man" argument ranks with the "someone gotta be duh ensign" argument... it presents a reason, but it's not a good one.
Well then.........what years were you a producer/writer on the show?And I have debunked them all.
In fairness, I heard they wouldn't let him direct because of his poor work attitude (remember he was removed from a couple of episodes season 3 for this) and also his refusal to go to "Star Trek directing school" and put the hours in OF HIS OWN TIME to learn the ropes.
Notably this never was brought up in his version and it strikes me that since he asked three times its more likely to believe him than the others.
That's true. Just look at how bada** she was at the end of the Thaw. And that was without unnecessary character-Shilling.
She displayed both leadership and her scientific mind in that episode.
liked Kes and consider Before and After a top 10 episode of the series![]()
People have been trying to come up with rational explanations for that single pip on Harry's collar for a long time. And I have debunked them all. Maybe someone will come up with a reason I can't debunk... but not today.![]()
Harry was NOT a "low man on the totem pole" character. He was a bridge officer,
The "low man" argument ranks with the "someone gotta be duh ensign" argument... it presents a reason, but it's not a good one.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.