There's actually evidence of a stationed based show as far back as the late 80s or 1990 on an asteroid before JMS pitched it.
Hell there was the "Earth II" TV Pilot film (1971):There's actually evidence of a stationed based show as far back as the late 80s or 1990 on an asteroid before JMS pitched it. He pitched the idea to paramount when it was under a different leader than the one that headed DS9s development. Don't believe everything JMS says. I respect Babylon 5 and it was really good at being the arc based show almost from season 1-4. 5 it went off the rails a lot. DS9 wasn't near as focused till the Dominion War arc came in about 3 years into the show. In fact a lot of the first 2 seasons were just thrown away TNG scripts.
Well, that's different since those are original novels, it's very, very rare for tie-ins to be adapted like that. The only examples I'm aware of are episodes of Dr. Who, TNG, and Monk.I'd love the idea too. I also prefer the show-runners brought one of the Trek novel series to live TV. They do it all the time with fantasy novels like "Lord of the Rings" and "A Song of Ice and Fire/Game of Thrones." The fact it hasn't been done in the Trek-verse - despite the fact there's a group of fans out there who'll buy every new 'Titan' or 'New Frontier' novels - bothers me.
OMG, I can't believe it didn't even occur to me that that was Tony Almeida until you mentioned it. Damn. I blame all the robots for distracting me. Rest in peace.I'm a big fan of Carlos Bernard from 24, so I was really disappointed when they killed his character off less than 5 minutes after introducing him.
I can totally see the whole mess unfolding and turning around with the Union saving Kaylons from genocide, and the Kaylons asking to join the Union, and having their application rejected.I can definitely see these events eventually opening up a new rift in Union-Krill relations. The Krill will likely want to take the war to the Kaylon's homeworld and wipe them out.
I’d like to see more of the history of the Union itself. When was it formed? Were the humans the race that created it, who is their “Archer” etc.
Be careful what you ask for. Sometimes, it's best to know less than more.
I can totally see the whole mess unfolding and turning around with the Union saving Kaylons from genocide, and the Kaylons asking to join the Union, and having their application rejected.
I would think so, how can forgive the death of probably a couple thousand on all the Union ships that were destroyed in the battle.
I am in tears with how much I enjoyed it. I wasn’t born yet during DS9s run. Maybe this is what it felt like?
This show leveled up so dramatically fast I still can’t believe it.
I've been holding back my opinion, hoping someone would say something to turn my opinion around, but now I must admit, I was disappointed in this episode.
I really felt it was a by-the-numbers affair, wrapping up in the easiest ways possible. There were some character moments, especially Yaphit and Ty saving the ship. Indeed, they are the heroes of the episode. The Krill-gons coming to the rescue was right out of Sacrifice of Angels, and really, Gordon and Kelly had nothing to do with it (it was the natural response to the Kaylons blowing up the Krill ships). Isaac does get some redemption, but his actions save the crew, but not really humanity. His decision lacked drama to go with it--it might as well have happened out of the blue.
My biggest problem was with the battle itself. I liked seeing the fleet pursuing the breakaway Kaylons ships over the moon--it reminded me of Moonraker in the best way. Otherwise, the battle was just a bunch of splodey splodey bang bang: a lot of ships shoot and blow up, but the story isn't being advanced through the special effects. Moreover, these close quarters space battles just seem contrived and dated by now. To top it off, it was all very clinical. The one person shown to die in the episode was not killed in the battle itself. In the years since TNG, we've had a lot of series that have shown space battles that are both exciting and dangerous while pushing more toward realism. Identity's battle came from an earlier era.
In the end, I think the episode was just a big sugar rush. It was epic in spectacle, but not in drama. After a few years, I think that most viewers will see this as a good, but forgettable, episode.
You mean aside from the fact the Kaylons wouldn't even be in Krill space at that time if it weren't for them following Gordon and Kelly.Gordon and Kelly had nothing to do with it (it was the natural response to the Kaylons blowing up the Krill ships).
They weren't trying to create a realistic space battle. It was just a means of expressing a plot point. And really, who cares? I'm so sick of the majority of sci-fi having a stick up its ass about being realistic these days. If Orville wants to do a good old fashioned space battle that seems more appropriate to "an earlier era" then that's fine by me. I want to be entertained, I don't need to learn authentic space combat tactics.the battle was just a bunch of splodey splodey bang bang: a lot of ships shoot and blow up, but the story isn't being advanced through the special effects. Moreover, these close quarters space battles just seem contrived and dated by now. To top it off, it was all very clinical. The one person shown to die in the episode was not killed in the battle itself. In the years since TNG, we've had a lot of series that have shown space battles that are both exciting and dangerous while pushing more toward realism. Identity's battle came from an earlier era.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.