• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The One Thing You Could Change, TOS Edition...

Were they cheaper than the turtleneck sweaters in the pilot episode? Those sweaters looked really classy, and I don't imagine they saved all that much money by replacing them.
What sweaters?

All the uniform tunics from the pilots on down were made from the same velour material until the 3rd season when they went for a doubleknit fabric.
 
What sweaters?

We might be running into a regionalism here. In some European countries, sweater doesn't mean a top knitted of yarn (the American meaning), it just refers to various pullovers and sweatshirt-type garments including the men's TOS shirts.

If it was 1964 and we were starting from scratch, here's something I would change: NCC-1701. I would work out a ship-class scheme that had some in-universe meaning (in real life, NC was the aircraft prefix for "United States, Commercial", and the second C was added for aesthetics. Later, Franz Joseph came up with the retronym "Naval Construction Contract," which makes no sense to paint on the hull of every ship).

So the prefix would be different for each type of Starfleet ship, instead of having everything say NCC. Which, of course, TOS never did in an aired episode, but FJ and the movies did. And the Enterprise would not need a four-digit number, because there wouldn't be so many ships of that identical class.
 
The early uniforms do look like a pullover with an elasticated collar, even though we know they were made from velour with zips on the shoulders
 
Looking at the pictures again, you're right that they weren't sweaters, but they still are really classy, and couldn't be much more expensive than the later costumes.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top