Back in the 1700s and 1800s people trusted the government and the government didn't have all of these conspiracies they were performing against the American people.
You can't be serious. There were halfhearted secession movements by New England Federalists and abolitionists, and two more serious secession threats by South Carolina decades before the Civil War ever rolled around.
Our elected officials actually cared and were real people like you and me, not people like Obama or Bush or any of these clowns in Congress.
If by "real people" you mean wealthy university educated (unlike 99% of the country at the time) mostly plantation and slave owning men who gained wealth through marriage and inheritance, then yeah, they're "real people." Adjusted for today's dollars, Washington was by far the wealthiest US president with well over half a billion. You have to wait until you get to #15 Buchanan to get the first one who wasn't an (adjusted) millionaire. Even Lincoln was born middle class (his father was a successful carpenter and farmer), was a highly sought after attorney, married into some money, and lived a decent upper middle class lifestyle before becoming president.
http://247wallst.com/2010/05/17/the-net-worth-of-the-american-presidents-washington-to-obama/2/
Nonsense. The state governments retain plenty of power.
Which begs the question of why you are able to talk so openly about it without a CIA hit squad taking you out as we speak.
I think I'm probably giving you too much credit, but if you're referring to
Anwar al-Awlaki, his targeted kill order had to be approved by the National Security Council and the President, and is the first such (official) order against an American citizen given to the CIA in our nation's history, and generated a ton of controversy and a legal battle as a result without him even being assassinated yet. Nor is he being targeted for "knowing too much," but rather because he's a pretty bad dude to put it mildly; and I mean bin Laden level bad.
Now, does that mean the CIA has never intentionally targeted and killed American citizens before, in secret? I don't know for sure, but then neither do you. Hence the whole secret part.
Name one liberal elected official in the federal government who is seriously putting forward a law to ban guns. And I don't mean trying to pass laws on waiting periods, background checks, magazine capacity, and so forth. I mean actually trying to outright ban guns completely.
Oh, it's by the people all right. It's just sometimes many of the people don't vote in their own best interest, and take a knee-jerk stance against things they would otherwise usually support when the debate is not framed with scare words and falsehoods and is actually explained to them reasonably.
It's a bit hard to take your complaints about trolling in other forums seriously when you post stuff like this.
That's cute, but not remotely accurate given the situation in the two countries we're occupying today. No US oil companies secured post-war Iraqi oil contracts, and few tried because they weren't profitable enough. Most of the contracts went to state-owned oil firms from Russia, Japan, Norway, Turkey, South Korea, Angola, China, and Malaysia who were willing to give up favorable returns on their investment in exchange for securing long term drilling rights.
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1948787,00.html
Afghanistan wasn't even thought to have major oil deposits until some were discovered last year, and the US Geological Survey helped them discover vast mineral wealth in the country recently which the Afghanis are auctioning off the mining rights to to numerous international bidders, with China being the frontrunner.
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2010/08/20108159431776396.html
We could have been as bad as the cynics suggest and just taken all the oil and mineral wealth we wanted since we were in control of all or most of those countries, but we didn't.
The number one problem with America...
- Americans giving money to every country, but America. We buy most of our products from other countries; give aid to Japan, Haiti, Africa and other places... yet almost nothing to cure homelessness here at home. Do other countries donate to help us? No. Oh, they LOAN the United States of America money, but we have to pay it back... unlike so many countries we have helped. It is time for America to put Americans first, then help others if we can.
If Americans would spend only $64.00 more each year on American products, we could put 200,000 Americans to work.
Apart from being the moral thing to do as the wealthiest nation in the world, and being the best means of actually promoting domestic security, giving out foreign aid is good for the US economy and helps those homeless and jobless people at home you mention.
http://www.devex.com/en/blogs/the-d...n-serve-us-economic-interests-experts-say?g=1
Our problem is not mistrust in the government, it is the government.
As you post on a forum on the internet that wouldn't exist without that government you despise so much.
Government has a lot of problems, no doubt, but I saw your proposals for overhauling it in that thread from a few months ago, and frankly most of your suggestions were at best unworkable and undesirable.