• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The new hand phasers suck, in fact...

Whereas, I'd almost bet real money that forty years from now, people will still recognize this:

Define "people."

There will always be a few trekkies who will recognize that prop. And there will always be a few who will recognize the new version. And then there will be the vast majority of people who would look at either of those two interchangably and say at most "that's the thing Kirk used in Star Wars to call Scotty to beam him up, isn't it?"

I wouldn't bet big money on any version of Star Trek being a particularly hot topic of conversation in another forty years.

I'm sure the same thing was said forty years ago.
 
I never thought anybody would still be listening to the Doors forty years later; and I just got a high-school graduation announcement from my nephew, who is wearing a Doors t-shirt in one of the pictures. :wtf:
 
Kirk, Spock & McCoy are, like it or not, as ingrained in the American subconscious as the Boston Tea Party.
 
Sure, but ingrained how? There are a fair amount of people who think of TOS about the same way they think of Adam West-era Batman.
 
Sure, but ingrained how? There are a fair amount of people who think of TOS about the same way they think of Adam West-era Batman.
Ask anyone you know what "Beam me up, Scotty" means. Peeps in ASIA can tell you. Heck, they're making our Trek toys for us! It's planetary, for Apollo's sake!
 
star_trek_classic_communicator.jpg
I've watched TOS as much as I've watched other Star Trek series -- but no, I don't recognize it. It could be the tricorder just as much as it could be the communicator; I can't tell for sure. So, an iconic design? Only if you actually grew up with it.
 
I've watched TOS as much as I've watched other Star Trek series -- but no, I don't recognize it. It could be the tricorder just as much as it could be the communicator; I can't tell for sure. So, an iconic design? Only if you actually grew up with it.

Cue to the Riker stink-eye:

riker.jpg


You... you don't... what!?
 
* Sometime in the mid 21st Century so-called "cell phones" began being referred to as communicators (the term we know today) because of the enormous popularity of Star Trek, the longest running series of varied media entertainment in history... *
 
I never felt a continuous beam was "realistic"
Are you dissing TOS?
I think he's dissing TOS!!!

HERBERT!

;)

Hehehe:p 'He's" a "she".

Who me? Dis TOS??? :eek: Hey, not I. :lol:

I was there for the first airing back in September 1966. Every frame is sacred canon, right.

Tell ya something though...the women's hair in TOS is something I coulda done without in XI. Hope they lose the 60's hair tributes in XII.

But the phasers were just too cool. I love them. LOVE them. Can't wait for the Blu-Ray.
 
Ask anyone you know what "Beam me up, Scotty" means. Peeps in ASIA can tell you. Heck, they're making our Trek toys for us! It's planetary, for Apollo's sake!

Sure, but knowing the catchphrase doesn't imply any kind of liking of or respect for Trek.
 
I disagree. The TOS phaser was classic, of course, and the STIII phaser was a natural progression from that and looked great, but the BEST is obviously the "assault phaser" from STV and STVI. Never before or since has a phaser looked so cool:

battlephaser.jpg


As for the new phasers - I like the overall shape and design okay, but the flip barrel has got to go.

This is pretty much my favorite phaser as by it seems to me to be the most realistic, other then those seen in the original pilot.

The classic phaser was great looking, but it seemed that it would have been dangerous to use. If you decided to place your other hand to it for support, you might shoot off your hand.

With the above design, the grip was mid body and seemed to have what appears to be a more comfortable grip. I also like that it had an additional power source with the "clip" in the grip. An easy to remove power source would make things a bit more safe I think. It of course, is also derived from the classic design.

I think the only phaser I really never cared much for, was the original phaser rifle from the second pilot.

This new phaser seemed a bit like a gimmick toy, with the swinging projectors on it.
 
I didn't really like the hand phasers in "Star Trek" either. I thought they looked and functioned like toys. The way they spun around and clicked into place. For a few seconds, I thought they were going to shoot water or silly string out of them during the fire fight.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top