Yeah, but if you don't number your movies, you'll have another Legend of Boggy Creek fiasco. We wouldn't want 2 Star Trek: IIs, would we?
Legend of what now?
I agree in principle with what you said in the above post...
...but there WAS at least one other case of TOS referencing an earlier episode besides Harry Mudd: The Organian Peace Treaty was mentioned in Tribbles, which I'm sure was a reference to the Organian people from Errand of Mercy.
Well, sorta, but not exactly.However, Paramount is including the costs of development of the unfinished Phase II TV series. Much of the TV series elements were not used for the film itself. Only $26 million was spent on the film itself. Most sources place the film's budget at $35 million when including the cost of the usable elements of Phase II.
So if we do the math, The Motion Picture profit was $ 104 million versus The Wrath of Khan $ 86 million. If we adjust those numbers for predicted 2008 inflation then the profit for The Motion Picture is $ 298 million against The Wrath of Khan $ 207 million. Bottom line is The Motion Picture is the most profitable Trek film ever.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.