• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Martian - Grading & Discussion

Grade the movie...


  • Total voters
    86
Tulin wrote:
IcecreamLtDan wrote:
This movie .... may be the last movie I see this year, depending on reviews of the 007 movie

Uuuuuummmmmmmm.......there's this little thing called a "Star Wars" movie coming out later this year?!?!?!

:wtf::wtf::wtf:

Oh, I'll be going to see it, just can't until after the new year. Life and all that you know.

Good boy!!!

:techman:
 
Finished reading the book last night, been busy the last few days so some large pauses in reading it. Good book, but I think it is lacking in not having an epilogue to wrap-up what happened after Mark got back to Earth. Granted the story isn't entirely focused on that, it's on his survival on Mars, but it seems odd that it just.... Ends.
This was the core of my frustration with the Voyager finale... But it didn't bother me here.
 
I finally saw the movie this morning, and I really enjoyed it. It gets an A from me.
Matt Damon did an awesome job, he had to carry a lot of the movie himself, and he pulled it off in a great way.
It was nice to see a movie like this that focused so much on the science and using it to solve the problems. I don't really know much about the actual science, so I can't judge how close it is to real life, but as a novice they managed to make it make sense.
The special effects and the Martian scenery were awesome.
 
Finished reading the book last night, been busy the last few days so some large pauses in reading it. Good book, but I think it is lacking in not having an epilogue to wrap-up what happened after Mark got back to Earth. Granted the story isn't entirely focused on that, it's on his survival on Mars, but it seems odd that it just.... Ends.

The final chapter with Watney back on Earth was chopped from the published book. I have not read it either, but I've heard it was chopped because Watney cursed at a teenager. I guess the publishers deemed it inappropriate.
 
Finally saw The Martian. I give this film a solid A. The only reason I didn't give it an A+ is because as noted earlier in the thread, they depicted the Martian gravity as comparable to earth's. [Wonder what Degrasse Tyson said about that?] And that it was anticlimactic that he gets saved and lives.

Modern audiences I believe expect a little more tension and less obvious endings in films IMO.
 
My son and I saw The Martian today.

Very good. I gave it an A-, the minus being for gravity on Mars thing.

I'm sure it's cheesy and played already, but I am fairly confident that for a long while, every time I come up against a problem to solve, I'm going to science the shit out it.

:lol:

:techman:
 
^That's a bit depressing isn't it, I mean it's a funny film but that's not it's fricken raison d'etre
 
Watney would be like:
"Oh, so I'm a comedy now? I'm trapped on Mars. With Disco! There's tragedy."

Yeah, I can't help but feel those who've categorized it as a comedy have missed the context behind the humour. It's part of his reflex mechanism, in being able to see the humour behind his situation.
 
That is weird. So does every movie that has humor in it, no matter how serious the overall film, qualify as a comedy now?
 
That is weird. So does every movie that has humor in it, no matter how serious the overall film, qualify as a comedy now?

To people without two brain cells to rub together, it would seem so.
 
I just generally despair of Hollywood filmmakers ever understanding how air works. They constantly get it wrong. Like thermodynamics -- assuming that people can be standing right next to a bed of lava or a fiery explosion and be perfectly find as long as the lava/flame doesn't directly touch them, ignoring the fact that the atmosphere would be conducting the heat and would roast them quite thoroughly. Or, same with explosions, ignoring the concussive force of the blast wave propagating through the atmosphere, which is far more damaging than the visible fireball itself. And it gets even worse when they have to deal with the absence of air in a vacuum -- sound in space, roiling explosions in space, explosive decompression myths, Superman's cape waving in space, etc.

That's why the Hermes decompression scene was so refreshing -- they actually got it right there. Usually when you see a scene of a spaceship venting atmosphere, it's a powerful wind that lasts for up to several minutes, but that's wrong. It's more like a balloon bursting or a water heater rupturing -- an abrupt release that's over in moments. That's why it's called explosive decompression. It doesn't mean that people blow up in vacuum like in Outland or Total Recall, it means that the air empties out very quickly in one single blast. They even had the air fog up as the decompression cooled the air and caused the moisture to condense, which is something that's often observed in aircraft that undergo sudden decompression. (That doesn't always happen, though, and I'm not sure it would've happened in conditions like this. It may have been a bit of a fudge to make the effect more visible. But if so, it was still grounded in plausible science.) They really did their homework there and made sure to get it right, which is why it disappoints me they didn't try harder to get across the near-airlessness of Mars. It's really contradictory to have the characters talk about the lack of atmosphere and then cut to a scene where there's a loud and forceful windstorm outside.

Andy Weir admits the sandstorm is fake and he just used it as the excuse to leave Watney stuck there. For what it's worth, Neil Degrasse Tyson is ok with the sandstorm as the excuse even though it wouldn't happen. He said they earned the right to cheat for the story by getting the rest of the science right.
 
^As I said before, I'm not talking about the sandstorm. I'm talking about all the later scenes that featured heavy, noisy winds outside the habitat when Watney kept talking about the lack of air outside. Hollywood may keep forgetting that sound needs air to conduct it, but I can't forget it.
 
Read the novel either late last year or early this year. Film does a good job of adapting to it. But leaves out a few catastrophes. For instance, he loses contact with NASA after they begin prepping him to go to the MAV4 site. And the trip to MAV4's site is not uneventful.

I haven't seen Gravity yet. And I was very disappointed with much of Interstellar. Glad to see this film SciFi film turned out so well.
 
I bought the Blu-Ray of this the other day, and got to say I'm disappointed.

Oh, not in the movie obviously, the movie -for me- is utterly perfect. But for a movie like this and considering all of the raves it got, I would have expected a lot more in the way of special features. But all it has are a couple of short behind-the-scenes vignettes, a gag reel, BTS photos, and a few 'in-universe" videos of various things, like the crew doing publicity stunts before leaving Earth orbit, some news-pieces during the disaster, stuff like that.

But, man, I would have expected to see some deleted scenes, there's certainly some since I've seen photos/screen-grabs of stuff not in the final movie, director's commentary or even a cast commentary, possibly even a NASA commentary or someone talking about the scientific acuracies and inaccuracies in it.

But, man, what a let down on the special-features front.

Still, a great, great movie, and looks good in BD. I've watched the movie a couple times since getting it, once with the "Descriptive Audio" track, which is well done. The narrator for it does a great job in setting the "visuals" for the scenes and actions of the characters and stuff. One of the better DA tracks I've experiences. (And, yes, I'm perfectly sighted, I still enjoy listening to the DA tracks.)

Would've expected more, but this was my favorite movie of 2015 and is one of my more favorite movies of all time, probably int he top 10.
 
The suspicion is those are being held back for a later, more feature-packed release. That's a shame.

I went with the 3D blu but haven't had a chance to don the glasses yet. Watched 2D with the family the other night.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top