• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The lows of Riverdale High

Funny how the Religious Right bashes everyone else, but when the tables are turned, they scream about being picked on.
 
I'm surprised that they're going through the trouble to create a new gay character when they have one of the most legendarily closested characters in Jughead.
 
Lisa Foad said:
And while recent years have seen further diversification of the cast (Raj Patel, Tomoko Yoshido), these characters are “safely” sideliners who “safely” fuck one another.

I can see where this will inevitably lead. The homosexuals will only have sex with each other!:(

In fact, in 2003, Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa’s homo romp through Riverdale, a play which featured a flaming Archie — was nearly quashed hours before opening when Atlanta-based Dad’s Garage Theatre received an ultimatum: halt production or face litigation.

“[Archie Comics] thought if Archie was portrayed as being gay, that would dilute and tarnish his image,” says Sean Daniels, the theatre’s artistic director. After a mad-scramble rewrite, Archie’s Weird Fantasy became Weird Comic Book Fantasy and hit the stage. (The 2006 GLAAD-Media-Award-nominated play is now titled Golden Age.)
Boy, I sure do feel bad for the people writing fan-fiction for the stage and charging money for it, who didn't bother securing the rights to the characters they wanted to use, or have the sense to write it as a veiled parody in the first place.

These are the same kind of goofballs who don't incorporate their business to protect their personal assets from liability, aren't they?

So, while a queer in Riverdale is long overdue, the inclusion of Kevin Keller is hardly queer. In fact, it’s the safest bet for a comic bent on preserving straight white masculinity. How? Because mainstream culture’s fear of “deviant” (read: black and/or gay) male sexuality consistently renders these bodies politely asexual – and therefore “safe.”
Now, I don't read Archie, but are there a lot of heterosexual sex scenes, express or implied? If so, maybe I should start reading Archie.

(The cultural acceptability of lesbians, on the other hand, depends upon triple-X fantasy, namely straight masculinity’s ability to imagine itself sandwiched in between — a lascivious insistence that’s too lewd for Riverdale)

We need only look to the wildly sexphobic backlash generated by Adam Lambert’s deliciously deviant performance at the 2009 American Music Awards (which featured boy-boy make-out and briefly suggested a blowjob) to remind us just how rigidly gay male sexuality is policed: the West Coast broadcast was censored; Lambert’s upcoming ABC performances were cancelled; ABC began tightening its performer contracts (to ensure live shows mimic rehearsals); and homophobes everywhere denounced Lambert as “obscene” and “disgusting.”
Now she ends on a totally valid point.

Riverdale’s Kevin Keller might be gay. But he’s not queer.
Except I don't know what this means.
 
Last edited:
I'm surprised that they're going through the trouble to create a new gay character when they have one of the most legendarily closested characters in Jughead.

Now that you mention it, yeah, that's strange why this new guy and not Jughead. Maybe they figure Jughead's not gay enough.

Lisa Foad said:
And while recent years have seen further diversification of the cast (Raj Patel, Tomoko Yoshido), these characters are “safely” sideliners who “safely” fuck one another.

I can see where this will inevitably lead. The homosexuals will only have sex with each other!:(
Why she said that, I don't know; there's no sex in the Archie books generally anyway.

In fact, in 2003, Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa’s homo romp through Riverdale, a play which featured a flaming Archie — was nearly quashed hours before opening when Atlanta-based Dad’s Garage Theater received an ultimatum: halt production or face litigation.

“[Archie Comics] thought if Archie was portrayed as being gay, that would dilute and tarnish his image,” says Sean Daniels, the theatre’s artistic director. After a mad-scramble rewrite, Archie’s Weird Fantasy became Weird Comic Book Fantasy and hit the stage. (The 2006 GLAAD-Media-Award-nominated play is now titled Golden Age.)
Boy, I sure do feel bad for the people writing fan-fiction for the stage and charging money for it, who didn't bother securing the rights to the characters they wanted to use, or have the sense to write it as a veiled parody in the first place.

These are the same kind of goofballs who don't incorporate their business to protect their personal assets from liability, aren't they?
Especially when they know how litigious Archie Comics can be about fan fiction.;)

Now, I don't read Archie, but are there a lot of heterosexual sex scenes, express or implied? If so, maybe I should start reading Archie.
As I said above, there aren't any such scenes in Archie comics anyway.

(The cultural acceptability of lesbians, on the other hand, depends upon triple-X fantasy, namely straight masculinity’s ability to imagine itself sandwiched in between — a lascivious insistence that’s too lewd for Riverdale)

We need only look to the wildly sexphobic backlash generated by Adam Lambert’s deliciously deviant performance at the 2009 American Music Awards (which featured boy-boy make-out and briefly suggested a blowjob) to remind us just how rigidly gay male sexuality is policed: the West Coast broadcast was censored; Lambert’s upcoming ABC performances were canceled; ABC began tightening its performer contracts (to ensure live shows mimic rehearsals); and homophobes everywhere denounced Lambert as “obscene” and “disgusting.”
Now she ends on a totally valid point.

Riverdale’s Kevin Keller might be gay. But he’s not queer.
Except I don't know what this means.

Me neither. But having seen the crappy Christian fundie books that ACP allowed Christian Spire Comics to publish with the Archie characters, I can now see why she's negative about this new gay character and Archie comics generally.
 
Funny how the Religious Right bashes everyone else, but when the tables are turned, they scream about being picked on.

This isn't the Religious Right complaining, but a GLBT person saying the the new gay character that Archie Comics is coming out with isn't all that and a bag of chips. Plus, she's saying that the Religious Right has and is been in bed with ACP for too long.
 
I read some of those old Archie christian comics...ugh.

Horny teenagers out doing missionary work...just like real life!
 
Never thought of Jughead as gay, just immature.
Liker any long running property, Archie is gonna change overtime as different people take charge of it. And like all long running franchises, especially those created before the mid sixties the core characters are gonna be straight and white. Though I seem to recall an article released aroung the same time as the announcement of the gay character, Archie Andrews will be entering a relationship with Valerie Brown from Josie and the Pussycats. (who is Black)
 
The Archie comic books are getting a new gay character on September 1st, but not everybody is pleased:

Archie Comics' history of whitewashing, censorship & the religious right

picard%20faceplam.jpg


For what it's worth this is at BOTH Archie Comics (as I'm sure this new gay character will be the most sterotypical gay character ever AND at the Right.)

Archie Comics were once good, great even. But ever since their "Double Digest" became as thick as what the old regular books were... not so much.

Oh, and Jughead wasn't gay. Not in the slightest. He was just more interested in food and other teenager things. Besides, if you saw what your best-friend went through with the two most important girls in his life you'd probably be dis-interested in girls too. ;)
 
Again, the article is by a lesbian writer who feels that this character is too many years too late, and is not really gay enough for her or for others like her. The right-wing deserve to be smacked upside the head, yes, but not now-when they start their collective bitching, then we start head smacking. As for what Ms. Foad says, considering the alliance Archie Comics had with Christian Spire Comics, I can see why she's not impressed.
 
If I remember that one correctly Archie and Betty were out doing something, Archie's jalopy broke down and the two of them had to shack-up in a motel for the evening. I think at some-point Betty called her father to let him know what happened and where she was. Betty was in the shower when her father decided to pick the kids up. It was, really, all very innocent.

Trekker, would so do Betty over Veronica.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top