If Bajor had ten times the mass of earth surface gravity would most likely be 2-3 times that of earth or more...
Did you actually read the posts where I use real mathematics to demonstrate that's not the case?
If Bajor had ten times the mass of earth surface gravity would most likely be 2-3 times that of earth or more...
Like the one where you use Uranus as an example? Sure, try to build a house there.Did you actually read the posts where I use real mathematics to demonstrate that's not the case?
Childish laugh.Like the one where you use Uranus as an example? Sure, try to build a house there.

Same.Childish laugh.![]()
Hmm.....a lot of contradictions here.Well... DS9: "The Nagus" tells us there are fourteen planets in the Bajoran system (the map you linked to shows fifteen), and that Bajor is the largest planet is the system. There's also some tenuous evidence to suggest that Bajor is the eleventh planet in its system given that we see an LCARS schematic of the Bajoran system and the eleventh planet is the largest, which would mean that the dynamics of the Bajoran system are very odd compared to our own. However, it's also impossible to reconcile all the facts we're given about the Bajoran system – early on we're told that Bajor has three moons (also "The Nagus"), then we're told it has five ("Progress"/"The Siege"), for example.
A while ago I discussed some hypothetical planetary details of the planet Bajor here, here, and here, where I arrive at the conclusion that in order for what we're shown about Bajor having inhabitable moons to make sense it has to be a super-Earth around ten times the mass of our own planet.
All those posts to which you link contain numerous assumptions, but I think it fails a particular test.Well... DS9: "The Nagus" tells us there are fourteen planets in the Bajoran system (the map you linked to shows fifteen), and that Bajor is the largest planet is the system. There's also some tenuous evidence to suggest that Bajor is the eleventh planet in its system given that we see an LCARS schematic of the Bajoran system and the eleventh planet is the largest, which would mean that the dynamics of the Bajoran system are very odd compared to our own. However, it's also impossible to reconcile all the facts we're given about the Bajoran system – early on we're told that Bajor has three moons (also "The Nagus"), then we're told it has five ("Progress"/"The Siege"), for example.
A while ago I discussed some hypothetical planetary details of the planet Bajor here, here, and here, where I arrive at the conclusion that in order for what we're shown about Bajor having inhabitable moons to make sense it has to be a super-Earth around ten times the mass of our own planet.
Why does this matter? Titan is not significantly larger than the Moon, and has an atmosphere more dense than Earth's?
Like Venus?The difference is in distance from the sun—it’s colder so the atmosphere doesn’t have the energy to escape, as a thick atmosphere would on the moon.
Like Venus?
In both cases, volcanic activity are related to the atmosphere. Closeness to the sun is not an issue.Venus is something like 36 times Titan’s mass and about 2.8 times Titan’s density (all rock and metal, not roughly half-rock and half-ice)
All those posts to which you link contain numerous assumptions, but I think it fails a particular test.
Could a planet relatively close in size to Earth hold onto a satellite roughly the size of Titan?
Why does this matter? Titan is not significantly larger than the Moon, and has an atmosphere more dense than Earth's?
In both cases, volcanic activity are related to the atmosphere. Closeness to the sun is not an issue.
I don't have to. The fact that large moons are capable to holding atmospheres and planets closer to the sun than earth is sufficient.Tell that to Mercury.
Of the ten largest moons in our solar system, only one of them has any appreciable form of atmosphere.
Hmm.....a lot of contradictions here.
If bajor is a "Super Earth", then the gravvity must be much heavier than Earth's...
Like the one where you use Uranus as an example? Sure, try to build a house there.
Of course massive planets can have roughly the same gravity as earth but the conditions would not be suitable for human life at all.
A rocky planet with ten times earth's mass but 1g surface gravity would have a radius more than 3 times that of earth. The increased mass would lead to more internal pressure and the planet would be much more geologcially active and hotter with massive volcanic activity and most likely a much bigger atmosphere creating crushing pressure at the surface.
It would not be a lush world described as Eden, it would be hell.
Your idea of Bajor having ten times earth's mass is based on it having a moon with an earth like atmosphere but that is just evidence that the writers didn't know a lot about space or science in general, it's futile to try to make it make sense because it doesn't.
Those are great odds.
As if there are 14 or 15 planets in the system and if Bajor is the 11th planet or the 7th as in the picture I linked to.Such as...?
Yes, I've read it again and the explanations about the gravity. I guess that it can be as you describe it.read the linked posts properly rather than just making assumptions about what they say. I explained why this is not necessarily the case.
Which is true.Yes, I made assumptions that were explained concerning Bajor being composed out of unusual materials by working backwards from the idea that Bajor must be a super-Earth to have so many moons, at least one of which is large enough for habitation and has a dense atmosphere. Star Trek is full of magic ores and crystals with bizarre properties that don't exist in real life.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.