I vote "Free." Toothpick Boy needed to go and his death led to a major breakthrough. Win-win.Yeah, as Scout101 pointed out, you're both wrong, as she clearly said (albeit in passing) that she didn't need to kill him to achieve her breakthrough.Dr. Scott did what she felt needed to be done both for her research
You misunderstand. I didn't mean he needed to go to make the breakthrough work. I was listening when Dr. Scott said she didn't need his death. I'm saying he needed to go because he was a self centered prick who spread death everywhere he breathed, resulting in the deaths of billions of people. Justice is served. Screw whether it had a practical purpose. I'm sticking with "Free Rachel Scott!", just like I'm on Team Carol with the Walking Dead.
Agreed.And the writing on this ep was terrific; it might be the series' best ep yet. I was hoping for a full Captain's Mast hearing and sentencing proceeding; it would have taken more time and been less intimate, but for an ep that stresses doing things by the book...
Devastating point, yes. I care not. FREE RACHEL SCOTT!And that's a devastating point Chandler made about Toothpick's anti-propaganda value; Scott definitely messed up, bad.
Hurrah for Season 3!![]()
Agreed again.