Sure, heroes need conflicts, but that doesn't mean they need to be deconstructed or suddenly dark, and ti doesn't mean Disney should be shitting on the old characters to prop up the new, less interesting character. I never read the now-legends books, but apparently Luke did some cool stuff there. I just feel like they did the worst possible thing. That being said, as simple as it is, having Luke take out the green saber and schooling some fools (other than his nephew) would have been awesome to see.. simple? sure.. but why not? But in truth, I wouldn't want him to just do that. But I also didn't want them to smear this "Oh I have angst now" shit all over this character the way they did it. The original trilogy was a lesson in writing, so much so that they made it look easy.. they peppered complexity.. they didn't dish it out in spoonfuls.. the characters changed between films but not radically. And yes, I am sick of the 30 year time gap being an excuse for radical changes.. there is no off screen movie, more it just serves as an excuse for lazy screenwriting.. screenwriters today would rather go dark that to fortify the optimism . They could have kept Luke as a good man the one that others use.. both now and alter, as a kind of measuring rod for Jedi.. and the fact that he put family and friends above all could have changed the Jedi philosophy gradually over many years. But they smeared a lot of crap on his character. And the fna base may be split. add to that a lady in a purple dress who is a bitch, hyperspace nonsense, Leia Poppins, terrible humor with Hux, a convoluted story, moral grandstanding, a useless subplot that "teaches Finn" in ways that no scripted story should ever teach a character, terrible hackneyed editing, radical tonal shifts with awful humor, and a film that really is just boring anyway, and you have a disaster
Ya know, before TLJ came out, I was all for a Master Luke moment fighting against Snoke and the Knights of Ren. I thought that would be the coolest thing. Then I saw TLJ and I realized something: It would not have been cool. It would have been kewl!!!1! But at the same time, it would have gone against everything the Jedi stood for.
For a thousand generations, the Jedi Knights were the guardians of peace and justice in the Old Republic.
-Obi Wan Kenobi
A Jedi uses the Force for knowledge and defense, never for attack.
-Yoda
Adventure. Excitement. A Jedi craves not these things.
-Yoda
Wars not make one great.
-Yoda
To answer power with power, the Jedi way this is not.
-Yoda
We're keepers of the peace, not soldiers.
-Mace Windu
TLJ showed all of this in spades with Luke's portrayal. But so much of the criticism seems to end with Luke saying "It's time for the Jedi to end." So much more happens in this film. So much more transpires for Luke that changes his mind and convinces him to perform truly the greatest heroic act he can: sacrificing himself for something greater by using the Force for knowledge and defense. His act gets to the very core of what the Jedi stand for. He couldn't be the legend the galaxy wanted him to be. You complain about the lack of complexity in the sequel trilogy but there is so much in Hamill's performance here and the writing for his character. It’s so much more than people’s perception that he regressed as a character. At least that’s how I see it. You can disagree.
I'm not for one second going to suggest that you don’t have the right to your complaints about the movie. You also have the right to voice them. And you have. At least thirty times in this very thread. You continue to add nothing new to this thread or your own arguments. It doesn’t matter how you say it, we get it. You don’t like TLJ. You don’t like the sequel trilogy. You really don’t like Galaxy’s Edge. You don’t like Disney and you don’t like the direction they’ve taken Star Wars. That’s your right. But it’s also our right to disagree.