Maybe the name is also based on J. M. Ford's concept of Kuve, which stands for foreign servants in his conception of Klingon culture.
If this is the case, it could be that it is a self chosen name with the meaning of servant to the people or tradition, or something like that.
How would hair get in the way of the sensory pits' functionality?
We real-life humans have sensory organs right on our face, and some people choose to surround them with facial hair, which does not interfere with their functioning at all.
Kor
I always thought it was dumb the Federation were close allies with the Klingons in the TNG era, early on it seemed like the Klingons might have been members of the Federation. Why? Cause it seemed a culture that lives for war no doubt has subjugated dozens of worlds, even pre-warp worlds.
I just kind of headcanon'd that it was part of the Khitomer accords and the aid the Federation gave after Praxis blew up. But couldn't the Klingons have many colonies that are the equivalent to Bajor and the Cardies?
I always thought it was dumb the Federation were close allies with the Klingons in the TNG era, early on it seemed like the Klingons might have been members of the Federation. Why? Cause it seemed a culture that lives for war no doubt has subjugated dozens of worlds, even pre-warp worlds.
I just kind of headcanon'd that it was part of the Khitomer accords and the aid the Federation gave after Praxis blew up. But couldn't the Klingons have many colonies that are the equivalent to Bajor and the Cardies?
I think it's probably neither a deal with the devil, or a reformed empire, but something in between - enlightened compromise. The Klingon Empire probably still holds conquered colonies in TNG, but perhaps in the interests of galactic peace, the Federation has agreed not to interfere - both sides stepping back from a balance of terror that threatened the quadrant. Perhaps the Klingons in turn have become somewhat more open and fair in dealing with their subjects - try to provide a fair judiciary and route of appeal, such as it is in Klingon law. Sometimes, and maybe a Vulcan diplomat like Sarek would say this too, perhaps the first steps to peace matter more than uncompromising rigidity, and pave the way for more reform in the Klingon Empire. I highly recommend Steven Pinker's history of war and violence "The Better Angels of Our Nature".
I always thought it was dumb the Federation were close allies with the Klingons in the TNG era, early on it seemed like the Klingons might have been members of the Federation. Why? Cause it seemed a culture that lives for war no doubt has subjugated dozens of worlds, even pre-warp worlds.
I just kind of headcanon'd that it was part of the Khitomer accords and the aid the Federation gave after Praxis blew up. But couldn't the Klingons have many colonies that are the equivalent to Bajor and the Cardies?
In "A Matter of Honor" in TNG Season 1 the Klingon battle cruiser that comes to take the three renegade Klingons into custody has a bridge displaying both the Klingon and Federation symbols behind the commander's head. The implication at that point in TNG seemed to be that the Federation not only defeated the Klingon Empire at some point after the TOS movie era but had accepted them as members of the UFP or had at least founded some sort of political union with the Empire.
I'm glad they didn't establish that the Klingons were members of the Federation, at least not this early in history. Daniels tells Archer in ENT that the Klingons are one of its member species in the mid-26th century, but that's another two hundred years into the future. This early and close to TOS it was a helluva jump and made no sense.
No. The showrunners have already said the Klingons are bald because their ridges serve as sensory pits like a viper, allowing them to "see" from the back of their head, which is supposedly an advantage for a predatory race (actually, peripheral vision is better for prey species, but whatever, Trek always fucks up biology). Hair would get in the way, hence they are bald.
The only way to square this with the older depictions of Klingons is if they are another species entirely. I'd argue it's just a visual retcon, but DS9 and Enterprise have made it clear that there should at minimum be human-looking Klingons wandering around.
So, did the showrunners say that Klingons are now a hairless race, or just that the Klingons of this particular time period shave their heads for some kind of sensory advantage?
Cause if they are now a hairless species, how did Kahless make the first bat'leth in this timeline? Visual continuity is one thing, but for a show so apparently concerned with Klingon mythology, they seem to have ignored a fairly significant, explicitly established Klingon legend that specifically involves hair.
Sword of Kahless - Memory Alpha
While I would like the story to lead to the Klingon government getting overthrown by TOS Klingons, I'm skeptical of that happening.
HOWEVER, I'm willing to let the story unfold completely before judging it.
My impression is that while the Discovery showrunners have paid attention to Enterprise and TOS when considering canon, they really haven't spent as much time considering the 24th century shows. I hope I'm wrong.
They also said Enterprise has made it harder for them to do certain things.
I wonder how Kol relates to Kor. He isn't his father, Kor's father is named 'Rynar' according to DS9.
Kol is the leader of the House as well.
I would like to see them somehow also pay heed to the TOS Klingons practical militarism - they were portrayed as a rational army, organized along principles we could understand - not a band or gang.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.