Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!
^To be fair, most of the audience will probably need reminding. The fans are going ot see the film regardless, trailers are generally targeting the wider audience.
There's a spoiler review (the spoilers are at the bottom and warned about) at OneRing.com which go go into detail about the deviations from the book in this particular film.
I don't want to read the spoilers. Is there a way you can give a spoiler-free indication about whether the changes are more in the nature of additions to or derivations from the original material?
^The first half of the review is spoiler-free and he discusses that stuff in broad strokes. He gives plenty of forewarning before diving into the spoilery things. You'd be safe to read it; just stop at the white space.
I read it. It was still too vague to answer my question. It's more of him just saying "wow" than saying whether it's related to new substantive additions or if, for example, Beorn is a villain now or something. I guess I can just wait and find out, though.
Although, if we want a fan outrage cliched phrase, I have a suggestion. How about "The Derivation of Smaug"?
^Lucky you! I'll be seeing it on the 16th. I'm also avoiding reviews because I don't want more information than I already have from the book, but I'm glad to see that the general vibe is positive.
Considering the eventful part of the book that this movies covers, it's got every chance to be more entertaining than the first one.
I'm a little disappointed because I did like "There and Back Again" as a title, but I think this change makes sense now that the story is a trilogy and not a duology. I think the original title worked better when it was just paired up with An Unexpected Journey.
In his announcement, Jackson also mentions that the Extended Edition of The Desolation of Smaug will feature at least 25 minutes of new footage, which is great news. I imagine most of that will be in the early section of the film, because (at least to me) it felt like they blew right through Bëorn and traveling through Mirkwood as quickly as possible.
It's fine I guess. I loved the original title, though, because of the reference. It at least helps with the false ending problem when Smaug dies in the first act, though.