I don't know. I always said that Jackson is kind of ripping off himself. The man can't do anything new. By doing this film he's catering to his own limitations as a film-maker. It's a very safe move for him.
Films go through changes in development, and what matters is what we end up with. It's been well over a decade since Jackson has made a film based on an original idea
Well, it sounds very much like a LOTR type thing. It's far more formalistic and meant to evoke an old language as opposed to being playful like the Hobbit is.I assumed they called it Erebor in The Hobbit, but I just looked and I can't find it anywhere.
In short, he's no George Lucas.
I seem to remember a certain George Lucas film with a very impressive trailer...![]()
Problem of that film wasn't the execution so much as the story and characters. Execution here looks great and the story is known.![]()
I was quite fond of the LOTR Wargs. For me this big bad wolves thing is a step back.Wargs done properly!
All films age, and most the vast majority don't age well.He rewarded himself with King Kong, a mere vanity project... now he has a huge vanity project that will take up three films. Sadly, it could be an awesome movie... uh, movies, but -let's not forget, it's strictly a vanity project every bit as much as Kong was, or every bit as much as Superman Returns was for Bryan Singer. Vanity projects almost never age well, and often stand out as odd eggs on otherwise decent director resumes.
I was quite fond of the LOTR Wargs. For me this big bad wolves thing is a step back.Wargs done properly!
I understand that it is within the realm of possibilities, yes, but I can't imagine how it could have been worse, let alone "much worse".If Singer had done Superman Returns without having his love of the Donnor films, you do understand that the film Superman Returns could have been a much worse film.
I was quite fond of the LOTR Wargs. For me this big bad wolves thing is a step back.Wargs done properly!
I thought the Warg attack was just incredible - virtuoso filmmaking. But the design of the beasts themselves was arguably lacking. They were touted as huge f***-off bear-wolves where you'd "die of fright" if you encountered one, but that didn't seem to really come across on screen. Maybe it's that they were too shaggy to be as intimidating as they could have been, or something.I was quite fond of the LOTR Wargs. For me this big bad wolves thing is a step back.Wargs done properly!
I understand that it is within the realm of possibilities, yes, but I can't imagine how it could have been worse, let alone "much worse".If Singer had done Superman Returns without having his love of the Donnor films, you do understand that the film Superman Returns could have been a much worse film.
Clearly that isn't the case since the framing of this story is set at the beginning of the Fellowship of the Ring, and that is (especially with the compressing of time it took between Bilbo & Frodo's birthday and the start of Frodo's journey in the film series) almost certain to be after the fall of Moria.I don't think they're going to extend the timeline beyond the movie timeline all the way to the death of Balin.
I thought the Warg attack was just incredible - virtuoso filmmaking.
Never had a problem withe the warg battle. It was a huge, frantic, confusing mess. Just like a real battle would be.
As for their look, they struck me as being based on primitive ancestors of wolves, Just like most of Mordors other beasts of burden
Yeah, that was the intention, wasn't it? Terrific idea.They were shaped like hyenas. I thought they were giant hyenas.
Never had a problem withe the warg battle. It was a huge, frantic, confusing mess. Just like a real battle would be.
As for their look, they struck me as being based on primitive ancestors of wolves, Just like most of Mordors other beasts of burden
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.