Here's the article on CBC.ca.
And the accompanying comments... wow. There are some pretty clueless men in Canada.![]()
Some of the ones on the UK Beeb are off too

Here's the article on CBC.ca.
And the accompanying comments... wow. There are some pretty clueless men in Canada.![]()
Gimmie a few hours.What? No discussion of the season premiere yet?
I thought it was a good ride to kick things off, but was a bit disappointed that we ended up right back where we started. Like the depiction of Canada as the tolerant, rational society in light of the turmoil south of the border in Gilead. I initially thought Lawrence was a goner once he was nabbed, but it seems like he's a pretty powerful person to have pulled through unscathed (unless I missed something). Looking forward to the season!
I have the same thoughts as you regarding Lawrence perhaps pushing June to become more involved in the resistance. He claims she is not intelligent, but hits her in all the chafing ways an intelligent person would be insulted, or possibly goaded into taking action to prove her cunning. Again, like your notion, maybe it’s because I adore Bradley Whitford, and am desperately hoping he *is* trying to atone for what he helped create.Yeah, I forgot to watch until this afternoon.
I've watched all three episodes, spoilers to follow (as this is a spoiler thread)...
I was really worried that we were going to get yet another reset of June's story with her back with the Waterfords yet again, but thankfully Serena burned down the house. Instead, June is now with Lawrence which has created a different and potentially more intriguing dynamic for June's story, but it also leaves me caring even less about Joseph and Serena. I really don't give a fuck what happens to them now.
I'm having a hard time getting a good read on Lawrence. While we knew there was a darkness in him from his appearances last season (and not just because he's proclaimed as one of the architect's of Gilead), he also has shown a caring and remorseful side with how he helped Emily escape (and June, too, if she hadn't decided to stay behind for Hannah). He's...tolerated...a Martha underground ring to operate in his house but only with certain limits and is very distrustful of anyone he doesn't know. And yet, he's been verbally cruel to June, both privately and publicly, when he deliberately humiliated her in front of the commanders.
I realize I have a certain bias towards him, partially because it's Bradley Whitford, partially because we need some godsdamn hope in this show. But the things he said and did in the third episode are hard to look pass because they were direct actions to make June feel weak and inferior. At least, June was able to find an angle accepting the "choice" of picking five women to become Marthas and new operatives based on their skills, thus saving them from the Colonies. I do wonder if Lawrence's verbal twisting of the knife of who June is and what she has and hasn't done was a subtle action on his part to push her into becoming more active in the Martha ring, but I imagine that's just my bias talking again.
I really enjoyed one particular part of these three episodes: Watching two acting giants, Elisabeth Moss and Bradley Whitford, really go at each other, showing that they had far more chemistry with each other than Moss ever did with Joseph Fiennes (his fault, in my opinion). And it's no surprise because it's been twenty years since they first appeared together in "The Crockpots and These Women" on The West Wing for her very first scene of that show. The relationship between them couldn't be any more different now, which demonstrates how great actors they both are.
We don't get to see much of Luke, Moira, and Emily in the three episodes, but what we do get is great, especially Emily's painful readjusting to a normal society. I'm glad she was able to get in touch with Sylvia in a timely fashion and we'll see more of Clea Duvall in short order. I worried during the dinner scene when Moira mentioned that she's seen her fair share of difficult reunions for those who escaped that we would see some kind of complication for Emily and Sylvia, but based on Sylvia's brief but disruptive reaction to hearing Emily's voice, makes me think that won't be such a problem. Hopefully the show gets back to them in the next episode.
I realize I have a certain bias towards him, partially because it's Bradley Whitford, partially because we need some godsdamn hope in this show. But the things he said and did in the third episode are hard to look pass because they were direct actions to make June feel weak and inferior.
What's wrong with that? Canada does have its religious fundamentalists, some with extreme ideas, and some of them do get elected. But thankfully their leaders know that any serious attempt (at least federally) to repeal any of the social advancements made during the last half-century or so would lead to their being booted in the next election (there are no term limits for our Prime Ministers; as long as they manage to keep being elected as MP of their riding and remain party leader, they can theoretically be Prime Minister for the rest of their lives).Like the depiction of Canada as the tolerant, rational society in light of the turmoil south of the border in Gilead.
What's wrong with that? Canada does have its religious fundamentalists, some with extreme ideas, and some of them do get elected. But thankfully their leaders know that any serious attempt (at least federally) to repeal any of the social advancements made during the last half-century or so would lead to their being booted in the next election (there are no term limits for our Prime Ministers; as long as they manage to keep being elected as MP of their riding and remain party leader, they can theoretically be Prime Minister for the rest of their lives).
Compared to some of what's already going on in RL, we are more rational and tolerant than the country south of us (on some issues, anyway).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.