C
Captain pl1ngpl0ng
Guest
Its a bit like that in every show/movie i ever watch i think...How could it go wrong with all those cards stacked in its favour?
Its a bit like that in every show/movie i ever watch i think...How could it go wrong with all those cards stacked in its favour?
Remember, this is a show about mushroom-spore powered ship. All those things you mentioned are writers just saying "If we can literally sell a show based on a mushrooms (actually charge money for it) and create a fake actor to play a pivotal role in the show, then no-one will care much about such inconceivable plan (i.e. no plan at all, just some coincidences)
Wouldn't SAG have something to say about crediting an actor who doesn't exist?
Kor
I like old Sixties and Seventies comedies, there was a kind of hokey charm to them, though the sexism was pretty eye rolling. Anyway in "Bewitched" the main character Samantha is played by Elizabeth Montgomery. She also did the portrayal of cousin Serena. The actress who takes credit for that role (I understand from Season 6) Pandora Spocks was simply made up, like an inside joke.Wouldn't SAG have something to say about crediting an actor who doesn't exist?
Kor
No. People take a phony credit for all kinds of reasons. As well as the Bewitched example above, Dustin Hoffman went by Sam Etic on The Simpsons, Alia Shawkat took a fake credit on Arrested Development season 4 to help hide a storyline surprise, and probably many more. And remember when Donald Kaufman co-wrote Adaptation even though he didn't exist?Wouldn't SAG have something to say about crediting an actor who doesn't exist?
It could also represent a psychological break. Mentally associating himself as a Klingon because of what he did.
That is if someone actually cares about Tyler. I personally couldnt care less if he was accidentally ejected from the airlock. Even with all the Klingon stuff he's still a boring character.
That is if someone actually cares about Tyler.
Hi All,
New here. May beam in from time to time. Anyway, not going to read through 34 pages of comments on this subject to see if this has been raised before but has anyone proposed the wild idea that...
Lorca may be Voq?! It's too easily being telegraphed that Tyler is. Could they really throw a twist into the tail that Lorca is still being held prisoner or was killed after being captured and the person that went into the cell with Tyler was a reconstructed Lorca-lookalike Voq? I'll go through a few of the episodes again since they escaped to see if there are any signs
Not really a spoiler but left it in there just in case people don't want to know my theories! I'm usually miles off with theories so take that with a pinch of salt!
Energise.
No. People take a phony credit for all kinds of reasons. As well as the Bewitched example above, Dustin Hoffman went by Sam Etic on The Simpsons, Alia Shawkat took a fake credit on Arrested Development season 4 to help hide a storyline surprise, and probably many more. And remember when Donald Kaufman co-wrote Adaptation even though he didn't exist?![]()
But when could Voq have possibly been converted into Lorca? Lorca was never away from the ship long enough for something like that to have happened, and he wasn't imprisoned with Mudd & Tyler for as long a time as the conversion process (that's currently associated with the Voq/Tyler theory) would have required.Been thinking similar for a few weeks now. Tyler just seems far too obvious.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.