• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Fountain (2006)

I love this movie, in fact its in my top 10 of all time. It is the very first movie I bought on Blu-Ray. I know that not everyone likes it, it has its flaws. However you cannot deny that its powerful, especially the performances. Hugh Jackman, who basically plays three different characters is amazing. The emotional grounding of Rachel Weisz and her portrayal of Izzi, still gives me chills.

The music by Clint Mansell is truly haunting, I love listening to "Death is the Road to Awe" at its loudest in the car.
 
Yeah, "Death is the Road to Awe" is incredibly haunting and powerful. Clint Mansell really brought an elegaic majesty to the score. Between this and his score for Moon, he's become one of my favorite contemporary composers.
 
It's arguable that the future part was real, remember future Jackman says "remember" then it goes to "present day". He used the tree to become nigh-immortal. But instead of moving on and remarrying, like 99.9% of people would do, he fixates on his lost love.

So, you can look at it as some modern guy coming to terms with his loss, or a future guy ...coming to terms with his loss.

I found it all intriguing, yet I disagree with it. Death is just death. There's no awe to it, and spirituality is just so much denial of the cold hard truth of the grave.
 
I liked it, especially Mansell's score, but I don't know if it's as terribly complex as I'd like it to be. Watching it the first time, it seemed pretty straightforward that the Conquistador scenes were from Izzi's book (her way of dealing with death), and the Future scenes were actually Tommy's way of mentally dealing with her death in the present. When those scenes reach their conclusion and Tommy accepts death, the film ends over Izzy's grave. The present day sequences are thus the only 'real' ones, to the point that I'd hesitate to classify the film as science fiction.

That's not articulated as well as I would like. Hmm...
 
I didn't like the movie as much the second time around, but it's still good. I'm still debating on whether or not the future part was real.
 
I liked it, especially Mansell's score, but I don't know if it's as terribly complex as I'd like it to be. Watching it the first time, it seemed pretty straightforward that the Conquistador scenes were from Izzi's book (her way of dealing with death), and the Future scenes were actually Tommy's way of mentally dealing with her death in the present. When those scenes reach their conclusion and Tommy accepts death, the film ends over Izzy's grave. The present day sequences are thus the only 'real' ones, to the point that I'd hesitate to classify the film as science fiction.

That's not articulated as well as I would like. Hmm...

I agree with this. I've seen the film a lot of times and this is what I come up with again and again. Darren Aronofsky has said on the commentary for the film that he thinks explaining things would rob the viewer of coming to their own conclusion, to which I heartily agree.
 
I love this movie so much I bought it twice! :D
actually I wasn't paying attention the first time and I got the 'foolscreen' version at wally world :lol:
got the widescreen version a bit later . . .
 
I have nothing against trippy filmmaking (I love David Lynch's work after all), but I thought it would have been a better movie if it had been a little more literal and a little less symbolic. I like the concept of two lovers coming to terms with life and death through time, but the three time periods were too disconnected from each other for me to really become attached to the overall storyline. Still, it was a memorable film.
I agree. The time periods were way too far apart, and the future one especially was very disconnected. I would have liked a bit more inbetween to show how he got to that point.
Through pure, high-octane craziness.

I actually meant to mention "The Fountain" in the "optimistic sci-fi" thread--any future where a man--a man with the mental problems the Fountain's protagonist must have had to have launched himself on a thousand year voyage to find heaven in a planetary nebula--is actually able to acquire a starship has got to be a future with an incredibly high standard of living.

Either that, or he invented immortality, got rich, stayed rich, and got crazier, and with no one to restrain him, built the world's only interstellar transport at the cost equivalent of billions or trillions of dollars, and plunged his neurotic ass and his tree/wife/thing into a star.

That said, the movie is a masterpiece, and makes me bawl like a baby.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top