• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Five(ish) Doctors Reboot

Which also explains why some people don't feel that the "I didn't like the politics" answer satisfyingly explained the magnitude of the incident.

Why is it our business? Why do we have to know all of the details of what went down? We aren't involved.

And at this point, will there really be an answer that is "satisfying"?
 
Why is it our business? Why do we have to know all of the details of what went down? We aren't involved.

What do you mean "our business"? I'm talking about it here, with you, I'm not asking Eccleston or anything like that. There's absolutely no harm in speculating or debating about that kind of thing, and thank god we can be curious about all kinds of things without being directly involved, otherwise life would be very dull.
 
Excellent.

A silly question - why is it Gerogia Moffet, not Davidson? Wikipedia lists her mother as Dickinson so that isn't the answer...

...BTW I think it's cool that 10 married 5's daughter :lol:
 
On a related note, I find it interesting that for her producer credit she's listed as "Georgia Tennant" since David Tennant is also a stage name (his real name is David McDonald).
 
^ Thank-you both. Interesting quirk of equity membership. It's strange that Wikipedia doesn't bother to give their "real" names.
 
Hmm, that makes three Doctors who use stage names. Sylvester McCoy's real name is Percy James Patrick Kent-Smith. Also the non-canonical Doctor Richard E. Grant (The Curse of Fatal Death, Scream of the Shalka) is really Richard Esterhuysen.
 
Excellent.

A silly question - why is it Gerogia Moffet, not Davidson? Wikipedia lists her mother as Dickinson so that isn't the answer...

...BTW I think it's cool that 10 married 5's daughter :lol:
Does it say anything about Sandra Dickinson's name? Just curious, since she was (is still?) an actress.
 
Why is it our business? Why do we have to know all of the details of what went down? We aren't involved.

What do you mean "our business"? I'm talking about it here, with you, I'm not asking Eccleston or anything like that. There's absolutely no harm in speculating or debating about that kind of thing, and thank god we can be curious about all kinds of things without being directly involved, otherwise life would be very dull.

If it's about speculation, then why is getting a satisfying answer to what happened needed? You brought it up.
 
The entry is filed under Peter Davison (not Davidson), because that's how he's widely known and it's the name most people would therefore look him up under. But the very first sentence in the entry reads, "Peter Davison (born Peter M. G. Moffett on 13 April 1951)[1] is an English actor...". So yes, it does list his real name.
 
If it's about speculation, then why is getting a satisfying answer to what happened needed? You brought it up.
I'm curious. Is that so hard to believe? Being curious is my job. And even if it weren't, I would still be curious.

I have no problem with curiosity. But "what happened" is being used for the speculation of whether or not someone you don't know is an asshole or not.

This has left natural natural curiosity--which is great, wonderful--and entered into the realm of gossip. We aren't entitled to know every little thing that has happened behind closed doors. Whose feelings were hurt and why. Who is a jerk who isn't.

Eccelston has acted every bit the professional. He hasn't slagged anyone by name. He explained why he didn't like the atmosphere there. Why he isn't interested in coming back. In a VERY respectful way. And here, all I see are fans responding to it with anything but respect. Just because he decided he didn't want to appear on a TV show.
 
This has left natural natural curiosity--which is great, wonderful--and entered into the realm of gossip. We aren't entitled to know every little thing that has happened behind closed doors. Whose feelings were hurt and why. Who is a jerk who isn't.

I'm not entitled to know, I'm just curious. I don't think I have a right to know, but I'd like to know anyway. As for Eccleston, I promise you that he isn't aware that I even exist, so I'm sure there's nothing about my attitude that is likely to have any discernible effect on his life. There really isn't much there to be angry about.
 
The entry is filed under Peter Davison (not Davidson), because that's how he's widely known and it's the name most people would therefore look him up under. But the very first sentence in the entry reads, "Peter Davison (born Peter M. G. Moffett on 13 April 1951)[1] is an English actor...". So yes, it does list his real name.

I was talking about Georgia's entry.

And apologies for the extra "D" - I have learnt that an innocent misspelling around these parts can result in a fate worse than extermination! I should have been more careful.
 
And apologies for the extra "D" - I have learnt that an innocent misspelling around these parts can result in a fate worse than extermination! I should have been more careful.

There are two misspellings that people do over and over again when it comes to Doctor Who, so some of us feel a bit touchy about that, it's true. ;)
 
I just figured it was important to be clear on the spelling for the purposes of looking things up in a reference work.
 
And apologies for the extra "D" - I have learnt that an innocent misspelling around these parts can result in a fate worse than extermination! I should have been more careful.

Davison and Eccleston are frequently misspelled by fans, and I've become desensitized to them. If I'm replying to someone who misspelled their names and I quote the message, I'll quietly fix the misspelling.

One of my favorite name manglings came from a BBC sales presentation I attended a few years ago. The BBC presenter (actual executive-level BBC employee, with a bbc.co.uk e-mail address and everything) was talking about the series, and he kept talking about "David Ecclestein." That's become a joke around the office between me and the coworker who was also sent to this sales presentation. :)
 
^That is a funny story. :lol:

When you have had 11 (12?) stars of a show over 50 years, it is a surprise that people don't get their Tom's and their Colin's mixed up more often!

(I like your method of "quietly" fixing - very much in the spirit of the Doctor.)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top