Its one thing to discuss the episodes and their impact, feasibility, and concreteness. It's another to ignore what was said and seen on screen.
I could say that its more feasible that replicators really had short order cooks on the other side of the wall who pushed food through them, but that's not what we see on screen. What we see is a fantastic futuristic device that creates food out of thin air. That's the facts, and that's not debatable.
Agreed. Plus, we are repeatedly told (on-screen) that replicators convert energy into matter. Not once have we ever heard of a 'peep' that they use raw matter of any kind in the process. It's always 'energy to matter' or in case of transporters 'matter to energy and back again' (replicators do the latter as well, but only when recycling) - they were VERY specific about these.
Oh... one more thing... you mentioned something about the US being in debt due to overspending, etc., and how the recession is mostly due to all of this. While I agree with this to a degree, I would have to say it's possible there were other factors in play that we as a general populace were simply not aware of which could have contributed to the situation.
And, if countries weren't in debts, there would be no need for money.
We are told the Federation doesn't use money. Its more fun to figure out ways of still bartering with other civilizations, putting a bid on a wormhole, and paying for food at Quarks while still meeting those requirements than to just dismiss the whole practice entirely.
Again I agree.
I think that one of the possibilities as to why a lot of people here claim outright that this is not the case, might be because they are seeing the show in a limited fashion (plus mixing and mashing a few examples that 'seemingly' contradict the statement - although in practically all of those cases, it was only when SF officers dealt with cultures that used currency based economy in the first place).
Then of course due to a combination of their own inability to envision a different kind of a system (because it clashes with what they were taught/indoctrinated with), or for some other factor causes their perceptions/conclusions of the show to disregard what was said.
A lot of people seem to take out things that don't suit them out of canon (or disregard it directly) in order to sustain their own 'version' of how things work.
Granted, I might be held accountable for doing the same thing, however I do not think so (necessarily) since I was trying to present possibilities that explain how things could have worked the way they did and still stick to the premise that the Federation doesn't use money as was repeatedly stated.
Majority of cases where so called 'currency' was used were inconclusive at best where details were left out, or was predominantly used with races that actually use money (but granted, SF majority of the time was bartering either way and not used 'money' - latinum is another thing, but that is easily explainable for the circumstances where it was used - DS9 and Bajor were NOT Federation property, nor were they stated to have a system operating in a manner the Federation decided - plus SF has it's own policy - comply with local law).
Plus there was a lot of disagreement between writers over the course of the show.
I'm merely trying to explain it all to fit within the well established premise that money doesn't exist in the Federation.
Bolians and Risans were never explicitly stated to be members of UFP.
We have no solid proof to say they were, and non Federation members had individuals serving in SF or other areas of the Federation. Nog, Neelix and Worf come to mind for one thing.
The Bolian ambassador could have been just another person representing the Federation as 'The Federation ambassador' due to his/hers excellent diplomatic skills (doesn't mean Bolians were part of the UFP).
Risans may have utilized Federation technology to maintain a 'virtual paradise' on their planet and turned it into a resort, but, again, it doesn't mean Risans were part of UFP - it was never stated to be the case on-screen.
Most of the expressions that used 'pay', 'currency' or whatnot terms that are associated with money and capitalist based economy I perceived to be used in a joking manner (though if I want to leave an open mind, then yes, I reserve there's a possibility they could have been meant in a context that money existed - however, given the situations and the tone of voice used in them suggested a joking tone - at least to me).
Plus, these people are technologically over 350 years ahead of us ... and they are supposed to THINK differently (well, at least, differently than 'most' of the population on the planet today).
And people are telling me that those 2 aspects (not to mention getting rid of poverty, disease, wars, etc. on Earth only 50 years after FC with the Vulcans) aren't enough of a difference for Humanity to create economy which isn't based on currency or money?
Last edited: