The Drumhead reeks of Terran privilege, poor Simon surrounded by mainly humans ready to accuse him based on his DNA. Satie's Betazoid assistant should have known Tarses was innocent
He was not inviting a 'potential spy' to his quarters. He was inviting a man who was only under suspicion due to his heritage to his quarters.
Some of you guys have terrible opinions. Instead of trying to talk you out of them, I'm just gonna mention a few good Jean Simmons movies:
![]()
Angel Face
Footsteps in the Fog
Hamlet (1948)
Spartacus
Elmer Gantry
Not exactly good but I liked it:
Rough Night in Jericho
It seems it's the first episode where we get to see someone on the ship that isn't an officer. And someone who didn't graduate top of their class from star fleet, and was the first to ever to something ,something And be able to listen to someone playing an instrument in a quartet and tell that they play a diminish D rather than an C sharp.
Kodos managed to hide his real identity in the 23rd century so maybe the Federation or Earth have sloppy record keeping.Thank you Prax, you said what I was trying to say so much better than I did.
I just want to add, I have a really really hard time even believing Simon even had a chance to lie about his heritage because I'd expect everyone's DNA is on record somewhere, either from transporter logs to medical records. So the "big secret" shouldn't even be possible.
Based on season 1 - 3 he is the worst captain, with dodgy morals, his definition of the Prime Directive includes leaving people to die even when it is Federation personnel who causes injuries to the natives. TNG Who watches the watchersPicard was great in the episode, he starts being onboard with the investigation, then it just keeps going and he's like hoold on a minute, then finally the line must be drawn here. That scene where Picard/Satie finally turn on each other was so good.
Picard inviting the "spy" to his quarters, falls in line with him not wanting to blow up the crystalline entity before talking to it, and offering lowered shields in dangerous situations all the time. He sticks to his morals even if it's the riskier thing to do & why he's the best captain
Based on season 1 - 3 he is the worst captain, with dodgy morals, his definition of the Prime Directive includes leaving people to die even when it is Federation personnel who causes injuries to the natives. TNG Who watches the watchers
Kodos managed to hide his real identity in the 23rd century so maybe the Federation or Earth have sloppy record keeping.
...
Are romulans and vulcans that different genetically though? Especially at only 1/4 of the person's whole makeup?Thank you Prax, you said what I was trying to say so much better than I did.
I just want to add, I have a really really hard time even believing Simon even had a chance to lie about his heritage because I'd expect everyone's DNA is on record somewhere, either from transporter logs to medical records. So the "big secret" shouldn't even be possible.
Not only was the admiral over the top, they made Picard completely the opposite. He was ridiculously quick, not to mention foolish, to dismiss the whole thing out of hand. He's inviting the potential spy to his quarters. They dumb down a very complicated issue into a black and white problem where Picard is good, and magically right, and the admiral is bad, mentally unstable, not competent, and on a witch Hunt.
They do the exact same thing in Silicon Avatar. The script has to tell us Picard is right without giving a good reason, which wouldn't have been hard, and the lady is shown to just be nuts at the end. If they didnt make the antagonist nuts, emotional, driven by revenge, etc, we might not side with Picard. If they showed two competent professionals(Picard and guest)acting maturely, with two opposing viewpoints, that would be both more honest, and more compelling.
Otherwise, these seem like writing shortcuts, or just cheating. I would give the drumhead 2/4 stars. A decent episode.
Part of this is the nature of TV when this aired in 1991. Shows had to be able to get your attention and be picked up in the middle. Most shows had to be understandable even to kids. Shows with a nuanced take on a complex issue were a rare exception.Not only was the admiral over the top, they made Picard completely the opposite. He was ridiculously quick, not to mention foolish, to dismiss the whole thing out of hand. He's inviting the potential spy to his quarters. They dumb down a very complicated issue into a black and white problem where Picard is good, and magically right, and the admiral is bad, mentally unstable, not competent, and on a witch Hunt.
[snip]
If they showed two competent professionals(Picard and guest)acting maturely, with two opposing viewpoints, that would be both more honest, and more compelling.
I just want to add, I have a really really hard time even believing Simon even had a chance to lie about his heritage because I'd expect everyone's DNA is on record somewhere, either from transporter logs to medical records. So the "big secret" shouldn't even be possible.
I agree completely with the conclusions in your post, but I think a better analogy is finding out a South Korean hid the fact that one of his parents was North Korean. It's possible, but likely, that his parents were loyal to North Korea and indoctrinated their kids in it so they could spy for the North."Isn't it true you are a quarter Romulan, that it is a ROMULAN heritage you honor!" Like those are equivalent statements. Even accusing Simon Tarses is the same as accusing some random person on the street of being a terrorist just for being Muslim.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.