• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Different Versions of the Enterprise

You do know that in Airplane ][ The Sequel that the film makers ( ZAZ ) put in a clip of NCC-1701 into the film, and it looked just fine on the big screen, so I think people are just blowing smoke out of you know where, when they continue to say that the old ship wouldn't look good on the big screen when ZAZ did just that without altering it at !
 
Woulfe said:
You do know that in Airplane ][ The Sequel that the film makers ( ZAZ ) put in a clip of NCC-1701 into the film, and it looked just fine on the big screen, so I think people are just blowing smoke out of you know where, when they continue to say that the old ship wouldn't look good on the big screen when ZAZ did just that without altering it at !

Robert Wise didn't seem to think it would work. How long was the 1701 on screen? A few seconds for a gag? That's not the same as being the central or featured element in a movie.

Sharr
 
When I was 12 I made a model kit of this cheesy-looking spaceship. Totally fake, I know, what with the simple shape, smooth hull and lack of detail.
F2169~NASA-Saturn-V-Launch-Apollo-11-Spaceshots-Posters.jpg
 
Sharr Kahn - It was a typical flyby shot of 1701.

Where it starts on one side of the screen far away, and goes to the other side and gets close.

A bit longer then 'a few seconds' gag.
 
^ I just hope the net doesn't have a meltdown the next day over the teaser, I think i'll avoid it that day, just in case there is a net meltdown.
 
Arlo said:
When I was 12 I made a model kit of this cheesy-looking spaceship. Totally fake, I know, what with the simple shape, smooth hull and lack of detail.
F2169~NASA-Saturn-V-Launch-Apollo-11-Spaceshots-Posters.jpg

Totaly fake looking, where's all the greebles and whatnot on the outside, no way could that be a real space ship, far too smooth and bland, needs more details for 2008.

- W -
* Smirks *
 
Arlo said:
When I was 12 I made a model kit of this cheesy-looking spaceship. Totally fake, I know, what with the simple shape, smooth hull and lack of detail.
F2169~NASA-Saturn-V-Launch-Apollo-11-Spaceshots-Posters.jpg

You're right. That launch tower has too many grebbles. Obviously fake. I also think the exposed engines, explosive bolts, and falling smoke from the center were bad design decisions.

Seriously, you do realize that's a low-res picture of the spacecraft, and up close it looks different. From far away, all the grebbles on Star Destroyers and other sci-fi craft are also hidden.
 
Cary L. Brown said:
You know more about Star Trek than anybody in your household, and probably than in your dormitory floor. And in that situation, you can get away with that sort of smug bullshit. But around here... you're the intern trying to lecture the chief surgeons, without ever having held a scalpel yourself... and it shows.

You sound like an egomaniac. WTF it is just a TV show. That kind of attitude is what's wrong with fans like you. I'm not responding to the rest because you're not worth it. Instead of "tearing anyone a new asshole," you show yourself to be a jerk.

I like the old 1701. It is one of my favorite ships. But I'm not going to denigrate other's art because it doesn't fit in with some hypothetical bullshit.
 
Here's George Lucas talking about the new Indiana Jones film - but he sure sounds like he's talking about "Star Trek":

"The fans are all upset," Lucas says. "They're always going to be upset. 'Why did he do it like this? And why didn't he do it like this?' They write their own movie, and then, if you don't do their movie, they get upset about it. So you just have to stand by for the bricks and the custard pies, because they're going to come flying your way."

:guffaw:
 
Jimmy_C said:
Cary L. Brown said:
You know more about Star Trek than anybody in your household, and probably than in your dormitory floor. And in that situation, you can get away with that sort of smug bullshit. But around here... you're the intern trying to lecture the chief surgeons, without ever having held a scalpel yourself... and it shows.

You sound like an egomaniac.
Um... you need to work on reading comprehension. If I'd said that I, personally, am the ONLY PERSON HERE who knows this stuff... that might be "egomaniacal." So, is that what you think I said there? You might wanna read again. Your reading comprehension seems a bit off.

This ENTIRE SITE is just FILLED with people who know this stuff. And know it better than you, our would-be-lecturer, do.

That's not all that big of a deal... except that you had the audacity to start LECTURING PEOPLE on this stuff, as though you'd made some form of amazing new discovery. Hell, next thing we know, you'll be at a geologist's convention announcing in that same would-be-lecturer tone that you've discovered that ... gasp... the earth is ROUND!
WTF it is just a TV show. That kind of attitude is what's wrong with fans like you.
Thanks for telling me what's "wrong with me." No, really... I appreciate it. :rolleyes:
I'm not responding to the rest because you're not worth it. Instead of "tearing anyone a new asshole," you show yourself to be a jerk.
Actually, you aren't responding because you're not up to it. I find that sort of response is common from people who can't address specifics. You don't like what's said, so you throw a few personal attacks and then take your ball and go home. Carefully tapdancing around addressing any of the actual points of conversation, you instead call me a poopie-head and run away. Whatever... :rolleyes:
I like the old 1701. It is one of my favorite ships. But I'm not going to denigrate other's art because it doesn't fit in with some hypothetical bullshit.
Uh... whose art did I denigrate? Okay, I stated pretty strongly that I HATE the Voyager design. Unless you're the guy who created it, this is hardly PERSONAL, is it?

I didn't denigrate your "art." I challenged your misstatements. If you'd simply said "this is what I want to see" that would be one thing. But you tried to make it seem as though you were speaking from a position of AUTHORITY, by virtue of being an engineering student. Being a student does NOT make you an authority, however... it's just the first step on the path to EVENTUALLY becoming one, and not necessarily on every possible topic.

I've become an authority on several topics, and it's those which I tend to act as an authority on. Engineering, and particularly aircraft and spacecraft structures, is an area where I AM an authority (albeit not "THE authority"...there are people who know a lot more about this stuff than I do, and a few of them, also, post on this BBS, just so you know!)

You posted a strongly stated position, claiming that your status as an engineering student made it unquestionable. That is NOT a wise position to stake out, boys and girls. If you're going to make that sort of statement, you NEED to be prepared to defend your position. If you're too sensitive and delicate to take criticism, maybe you should avoid making comments that are likely to DRAW it.

Politicians, for instance, should expect that every comment that they ever make will be needled over ad-nauseum. If they can't take it... they should find another line of work. PUBLIC STATEMENTS (and this is a public forum, after all) are entirely subject to discussion, debate, and being CHALLENGED.

Your argument was weak. It's up to you, now, to come back with a stronger, rethought argument, addressing the points which were raised... or to accept that you're not able to handle criticism and should avoid doing things that might bring it about!

That's really YOUR call. But you really need to learn this lesson now, before you end up out in the real world, in your first engineering job, and try pulling the same sort of stunt in a situation where it will MATTER. Challenging the VP of Engineering on why he's wrong and you're right about a point is something you need to be VERY careful about if you decide to do it. Claiming to speak as an "authority," God forbid LECTURING to him... how well ya think that'll turn out for ya?
 
Cary L Brown, you do not need to slam everyone you have a disagreement with. You are very articulate, still you under mind yourself by over playing your rhetoric.
 
Starship Polaris said:
Here's George Lucas talking about the new Indiana Jones film - but he sure sounds like he's talking about "Star Trek":

"The fans are all upset," Lucas says. "They're always going to be upset. 'Why did he do it like this? And why didn't he do it like this?' They write their own movie, and then, if you don't do their movie, they get upset about it. So you just have to stand by for the bricks and the custard pies, because they're going to come flying your way."

:guffaw:

So true! There are too many egos on this BBS. It used to be so much fun here before DS9 ended. Now there is too much bickering and "partisan" attacking. People seem content with their own opinion and damn anyone for disagreeing. It is like the Neutral Zone board over the entire site (what happened to that forum BTW).
 
Jimmy_C said:
Seriously, you do realize that's a low-res picture of the spacecraft, and up close it looks different. From far away, all the grebbles on Star Destroyers and other sci-fi craft are also hidden.

Hidden? Hardly.

400px-Imperial_sd_group.jpg
 
Jimmy_C said:
Cary L. Brown said:
You know more about Star Trek than anybody in your household, and probably than in your dormitory floor. And in that situation, you can get away with that sort of smug bullshit. But around here... you're the intern trying to lecture the chief surgeons, without ever having held a scalpel yourself... and it shows.

You sound like an egomaniac. WTF it is just a TV show. That kind of attitude is what's wrong with fans like you. I'm not responding to the rest because you're not worth it. Instead of "tearing anyone a new asshole," you show yourself to be a jerk.

I like the old 1701. It is one of my favorite ships. But I'm not going to denigrate other's art because it doesn't fit in with some hypothetical bullshit.

I think what's being missed here is that the so-called "chief surgeons" are no closer than the supposed "interns" to being granted hospital privileges - much less being invited to operate. Folks can debate which of them could take the other in a prizefight for the heavyweight championship of the world, and it would amount to the same thing. :lol:
 
Ezri said:
Cary L Brown, you do not need to slam everyone you have a disagreement with. You are very articulate, still you under mind yourself by over playing your rhetoric.

It's undermine.
 
Arlo said:
Jimmy_C said:
Seriously, you do realize that's a low-res picture of the spacecraft, and up close it looks different. From far away, all the grebbles on Star Destroyers and other sci-fi craft are also hidden.

Hidden? Hardly.

400px-Imperial_sd_group.jpg

You might be right about them, but look at this:

space-station-iss-orbit.jpg


See all those grebbles? And up close:

DVD-1082-3_375x300.jpg


Unlike the Saturn 5 that's intended to say in orbit for a longer time span. And what about this:

skylab4_nasa_big.gif


Simpler, but still grebble-looking even thought everything has a purpose. The more complicated the spacecraft, the more uneven it looks. It seems the Star Destroyers actually seem more like an extrapolation than the 1701, when you look at it that way.
 
number6 said:
Ezri said:
Cary L Brown, you do not need to slam everyone you have a disagreement with. You are very articulate, still you under mind yourself by over playing your rhetoric.

It's undermine.

That is true, I stand corrected. If you want you can go down to the homeless shelter and beat up a drunk to make yourself feel much better.
 
I think this is a little different. For better or worse, Paramount all but abandoned Star Trek for a decade. Fans kept it alive with their own myths and imagery, and that is the yardstick some will inevitably measure anything else by. I nevertheless believe that if the Trek XI tale is good and if it makes extraordinary efforts to be believable not just to the eye but to the intellect, it will be popular, and any transgressions against expectations will be readily forgiven. But woe unto the next Bermaga that throws out fan expectations in pursuit of a crappy story. Expect to be readily rebooted right in the keister.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top