• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Defenders--Marvel/Netflix

If those exist, seems like an even better choice for the other three Defenders.
 
If those exist, seems like an even better choice for the other three Defenders.
They wouldn't have the bulletproof tissue under the shirt that could take the impact, which is where the real damage is done. Since he is pretty regularly using himself as a shield and getting his clothing torn to shreds though, a tight yellow vibranium-weave v-neck would keep him from having to restock constantly.
 
Or he could, y'know, just take off his shirt. He's super-strong, invulnerable, and ripped. If you got it, flaunt it. Queue Right Said Fred.
 
^^I get your point and I was mostly joking, but a vibranium-weave would protect non-supers too seeing as it absorbs the impact energy.

^Good point! :D
 
Slight problem: vibranium isn't exactly easy to come by and if such a thing even existed, it's value would be greater than that of the Shir---I mean Manhattan!

Really speaking, he doesn't need something to stop bullets, just something that can transfer the kinetic energy onto him without becoming damaged. A conductor rather than an insulator.
 
On a completely different note, I found myself wondering if we'll actually hear the name "Defenders" in the show, and if so, who will coin the term?

Come to think of it, I bet Karen will name them in a New York Bulletin article when their actions become public and the team will hate it.
 
Last edited:
I found myself wondering if we'll actually hear the name "Defenders" in the show, and if so, who will coin the term?

Will Smith in a cameo as a bystander: "So what are you, some kind of Defenders?" :D
 
Even though they try to avoid the "cheesy" aspects or make fun of them, I could see the Defenders tag being a purposeful thing, maybe they'll make a point about the difference between defending and avenging?
 
^ Eh, I'd rather they didn't go there...I never thought the name "The Avengers" was to be taken literally, in or out of comics.
 
Yeah, I never quite got why they were called that.
Tony Stark said this in the movie
Tony Stark: You're missing the point! There's no throne, there is no version of this where you come out on top. Maybe your army comes and maybe it's too much for us but it's all on you. Because if we can't protect the Earth, you can be damned well sure we'll avenge it!
It's the closest thing to an explanation.
 
Yeah, there was literally no comic book explanation. The movie did a much better job with explaining it if you ignore that it was already called "The Avengers Initiative" long before the justification.
 
Yeah, there was literally no comic book explanation. The movie did a much better job with explaining it if you ignore that it was already called "The Avengers Initiative" long before the justification.
My interpretation for that is the idea behind for the initiative was to have a group of enhanced that could hit back if SHIELD ever got blindsided by something they couldn't see coming. I mean by definition "avenging" is not a proactive concept, right?
Will Daredevil be the only one with a costume?
More to the point: he's the only one with a secret identity.

I'll be curious to see if that's a point of contention among the others. I can see Luke and Danny being OK with it if Claire vouches for him, but I can see Jessica being less than happy. Of course if he actually takes the mask off for them it's academic.
 
Last edited:
That's the thing, I never really bought into the movie's attempt to explain/justify the name...that's a detail that I prefer to squint past. Stan got it right the first time when the Wasp pulled it out of her ass.
 
That's the thing, I never really bought into the movie's attempt to explain/justify the name...that's a detail that I prefer to squint past.

If you mean Tony's line about avenging Coulson in The Avengers, I never took that explaining the name, since of course the name had existed since the first movie. I just took it as Tony (and Whedon) using the already-established Avengers name to add resonance to his threat to Loki -- i.e. it's not just a label anymore, now it really means something to us and we intend to live up to it.
 
It's probably best not to overthink such things. Odds are the name will come from the press, not The Defenders themselves.
 
If you mean Tony's line about avenging Coulson in The Avengers, I never took that explaining the name, since of course the name had existed since the first movie. I just took it as Tony (and Whedon) using the already-established Avengers name to add resonance to his threat to Loki -- i.e. it's not just a label anymore, now it really means something to us and we intend to live up to it.
I preferred not to even put that kind of thought into it, because trying to make the name literally meaningful was a cheesy move, IMO.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top