Eckstein is almost 40. Dawson is 42.
I'm pretty sure they'd probably cast somebody younger if we see TCW era Ahsoka. I just don't see anyway Rosario Dawson could pull off 15 even with the Ahsoka makeup.If Eckstein was suitable to play a live action Ahsoka, they would have used her in The Mandalorian. Any live action Ahsoka appearances are going to be Dawson, even if that's in the Obi-Wan show or even a live action Clone Wars era flashback. We'll just have to squint and pretend she's young in those scenes. Meanwhile Eckstein will always do Ahsoka's voice in animated productions, even if it's set post ROTJ.
As I said, that's very unlikely. Indeed, there's even a scene in Rebels where she specifically laments not being able to consult Obi-Wan or Yoda and is visibly shocked that Ezra has a way to do so. I really don't think she interacted with Kenobi in this time period, or indeed even know if he was still alive.Only if it's in a flashback.
If she actually shows up during the events of the show, she'd be 27/28. Dawson looks pretty young for her age as it is, let a lone under alien makeup/prosthetic and CGI help.
What?Rey has made it to Rebels where she was not born yet,
As of right now, Rangers of the New Republic isn't happening anymore. That might change (I wouldn't be surprised) but it's not moving forward at this time.
- She will appear in Ahsoka, likely in Rangers of the New Republic and possibly The Book of Boba Fett as they reach their common culmination. Thrawn?
She's one of the voices Ezra heard in the Jedi temple before (or after, I forget exactly when) rescuing Ahsoka.What?
Ugh.She's one of the voices Ezra hears in the Jedi temple before rescuing (or after, I forget exactly when) Ahsoka.
Why? Her inclusion demonstrated how that section of the temple was outside of time. She wasn't the only one heard from the future.Ugh.
Unnecessary and uninteresting. But, I'm not a fan of temporal anomalies in the first place. But, to my mind it just strikes me as odd. Probably makes more sense in context.Why? Her inclusion demonstrated how that section of the temple was outside of time. She wasn't the only one heard from the future.
I mean, I have, just been a while. It was a concept so far out there that I had to turn it off.Definitely does. I highly recommend watching those episodes before judging. They were among my favorite episodes of Rebels.
In terms of Star Wars it was for me. Science fiction doesn't mean I buy everything put out there.Well...it's not that far out there. Especially for science fiction.![]()
It's fantasy space magic; It's really not trying to sell it on the scientific plausibility.In terms of Star Wars it was for me. Science fiction doesn't mean I buy everything put out there.![]()
Who said anything about plausibility? It just didn't make sense, looked weird on screen, and completely ruined any suspension of disbelief in that moment. I'm sure if I revisit the episode now it might make more sense. I don't care about plausibility so much as I care about coherency. This was one that didn't seem coherent in light of past aspects of the universe.It's fantasy space magic; It's really not trying to sell it on the scientific plausibility.
That said, the netherworld of the Cosmic Force has already been established as being a place where time has no meaning. Indeed, how else do you think Jedi get visions of possible futures? How did Anakin "see" things before they happen? How did Luke see a City in the Clouds and his friends in pain before they'd even been captured?
Honestly, this is one of those rare cases in Star Wars where it's actually more science than fantasy, even if unintentionally. If it seems weird and illogical, well welcome to the world of actual quantum physics and four dimensional causality!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.