Noted and corrected.Dr McCormack![]()
Noted and corrected.Dr McCormack![]()
Michael Burnham is by far the best thing to happen to Spock since the Genesis device.How I feel about Michael Burnham.
Michael Burnham is by far the best thing to happen to spot since the Genesis device.
God damn autocorrect.Unfortunately, we’re not taking about Spot but Spock.![]()
Good point. There is, after all, such a thing as Pon Farr. Just because thinking he'd killed Kirk was enough to snap him out of his first Pon Farr (and left him utterly disgusted with T'Pring) doesn't mean he stopped experiencing it. A lot more than 7 years passed between TSFS and his attempt to stop the supernova.4. I think my biggest issue with the book is the fact that Doctor McCormack chose not to include Spock getting married. I don't think she needed to make it to Saavik, especially as she's portrayed as a daughter figure but I do think she could have inserted a paragraph about a OC.
"As you know, I was married to a human woman named Susan Fontana. I have nothing to say about our private relationship other than it was good and she passed of natural causes."
I think my biggest issue with the book is the fact that Doctor McCormack chose not to include Spock getting married. I don't think she needed to make it to Saavik, especially as she's portrayed as a daughter figure but I do think she could have inserted a paragraph about a OC.
Remember it's only our speculation that it was Spock's wedding that Picard attended. His words were "Sarek's son" and after Sybok, after adopting Michael, after doing the creepy Amanda 2 thing with Perrin, who's to say Sarek hasn't adopted a shitload of wayward kids over the years?
While possible, I think it was meant to be Spock and while it wasn't true in the Autobiographies continuity, it was true in other book ones.
I wish that The events of Spock’s World had been at least acknowledged in Spock’s autobiography. (Actually, Spock’s and Kirk’s…) I don’t think that the story terribly conflicts with anything that has been presented “in Canon” and if anything, it helps illustrate Sarek’s later appreciation for Spock’s friends (especially McCoy)
Besides, there's no mention in the book of any other children of Sarek so either way, it's not covered.
If you said Spock had a secret sister prior to 2017 you'd have been laughed out of the room.We all know Sarek only had two sons
If you said Spock had a secret sister prior to 2017 you'd have been laughed out of the room.
It doesn't even matter what the book says.
We all know Sarek only had two sons: Spock and Sybok. The wedding in question was obviously not Sybok's, so by definition, it must have been Spock.
The only thing we don't know, canonically speaking, is who the bride was, although it was most likely Saavik.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.