• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Autobiography of Mr. Spock by... Una McCormack?

Spock was a captain for five movies.

Spock is a pop culture icon, arguably more well known among the general public than Captain Sisko or Captain Archer. Not hard to see why he's getting an autobiography before them.

Fair enough. I guess I'm just looking forward to the Sisko book (which is me getting ahead of myself, I haven't even read the Kirk and Picard books yet).

It seems to me that the order is more "who the general public cares about" than "characters by rank," anyway. Imagine trying to convince a bookseller that people are really chomping at the bit for an Archer biography.

I think it could be fun...always great in those comic book Who's Who entries to see the writer try to sum up messed up comic book runs.

In fairness, it was published in 1805 so not a bad price for a 200 year old book. Heck, it is older than Star Trek. :D

Quick! Some one call Dulmur and Lucsly to investigate!
 
That's exactly why I was disappointed to see that Goodman wouldn't be writing the Spock biography. He did some fun teasing at Spock's wedding in the Kirk and Picard books, and I was looking forward to seeing his version of who Spock's bride was in the Spock book.

As tempting as it would be to say 'Saavik,' these days that seems a little too obvious. If it was me, I'd swerve it and say it was the Romulan Commander from 'The Enterprise Incident,' who reunited with him during his ambassador years. There's a nice space of years between the Tomed Incident and the Narendra III Incident that allows that. (She, of course, somehow gets killed during the latter.)
 
As tempting as it would be to say 'Saavik,' these days that seems a little too obvious. If it was me, I'd swerve it and say it was the Romulan Commander from 'The Enterprise Incident,' who reunited with him during his ambassador years. There's a nice space of years between the Tomed Incident and the Narendra III Incident that allows that. (She, of course, somehow gets killed during the latter.)
And could make for good backstory for his quest in later years to reunite Romulus and Vulcan
 
As tempting as it would be to say 'Saavik,' these days that seems a little too obvious. If it was me, I'd swerve it and say it was the Romulan Commander from 'The Enterprise Incident,' who reunited with him during his ambassador years. There's a nice space of years between the Tomed Incident and the Narendra III Incident that allows that. (She, of course, somehow gets killed during the latter.)
I've honestly never gotten the appeal of the Romulan Commander from TEI. She's never struck me as someone that Spock would be attracted to for second, largely because she's so easily fooled throughout the entire episode. Intelligence should be Requirement #1 for a possible Spock love interest, I think.
 
Last edited:
I'd say that Spock is probably the most well known character in the entire franchise. I have a feeling that if you stopped any random person on the street, they would have at least a vague idea who Spock is, even if they had never watched a single episode of any of the Star Treks.
Nicholas Meyer said in his TWOK commentary that he started the movie on a closeup of Spock's ear because he figured that was the one element that everyone knew from Star Trek.
 
Last edited:
This. Trek is very silly, and I don't "get" why some of the silliness is okay but other parts arent. Real life has some shit and nonsensical episodes and movies too but they still happened.

Exactly, yeah. We need a reason to write-off The Final Frontier, but Spock's Brain gets a pass?

And Spock is the most recognisable character from the series for the general public. Stop a stranger in the street, ask them what they know about Star Trek, and they'll probably say "the dude with the ears".
 
If it's canon it should be acknowledged, or at least not contradicted.

Unless it's Trip's death in Enterprise.
 
If it's canon it should be acknowledged, or at least not contradicted.

Unless it's Trip's death in Enterprise.
In retrospect, I kind of wish they'd just stuck with that. Or at the very least, waited to undo it until the Enterprise novel storyline actually got to 2161, so Trip could've been part of the crew during the Romulan War instead of dangling on the end of 31's fishing line for years.
 
I don't think Sybok is a character that detracts anything from Mr. Spock because there's plenty of ways of handling Sybok's character that could have been interesting. Also, bluntly, it's not like there isn't an Occam's Razor of writing him into Star Trek's literary canon.

"Sybok is Spock's half-brother from Sarek's arranged marriage that all Vulcans go through. Sarek and his wife divorced because they didn't work out but Sybok was raised by his mother. He grew up to be an incredibly powerful psychic but mystical and manipulative."

There, done.
 
Last edited:
In retrospect, I kind of wish they'd just stuck with that. Or at the very least, waited to undo it until the Enterprise novel storyline actually got to 2161, so Trip could've been part of the crew during the Romulan War instead of dangling on the end of 31's fishing line for years.
Which was kinda confusing. That program was set in 2161, but Trip’s death was faked several years before that. Did section 31 create several years of life for Trip in the official records?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top