I love Spock as much as the next guy, but shouldn't they finish the captains before moving on to the first officers?
Popularity (i.e. commercial appeal) trumps rank.
I love Spock as much as the next guy, but shouldn't they finish the captains before moving on to the first officers?
Spock was a captain for five movies.
Spock is a pop culture icon, arguably more well known among the general public than Captain Sisko or Captain Archer. Not hard to see why he's getting an autobiography before them.
It seems to me that the order is more "who the general public cares about" than "characters by rank," anyway. Imagine trying to convince a bookseller that people are really chomping at the bit for an Archer biography.
In fairness, it was published in 1805 so not a bad price for a 200 year old book. Heck, it is older than Star Trek.![]()
That's exactly why I was disappointed to see that Goodman wouldn't be writing the Spock biography. He did some fun teasing at Spock's wedding in the Kirk and Picard books, and I was looking forward to seeing his version of who Spock's bride was in the Spock book.
And could make for good backstory for his quest in later years to reunite Romulus and VulcanAs tempting as it would be to say 'Saavik,' these days that seems a little too obvious. If it was me, I'd swerve it and say it was the Romulan Commander from 'The Enterprise Incident,' who reunited with him during his ambassador years. There's a nice space of years between the Tomed Incident and the Narendra III Incident that allows that. (She, of course, somehow gets killed during the latter.)
I've honestly never gotten the appeal of the Romulan Commander from TEI. She's never struck me as someone that Spock would be attracted to for second, largely because she's so easily fooled throughout the entire episode. Intelligence should be Requirement #1 for a possible Spock love interest, I think.As tempting as it would be to say 'Saavik,' these days that seems a little too obvious. If it was me, I'd swerve it and say it was the Romulan Commander from 'The Enterprise Incident,' who reunited with him during his ambassador years. There's a nice space of years between the Tomed Incident and the Narendra III Incident that allows that. (She, of course, somehow gets killed during the latter.)
I'm personally fine with discounting Sybok, as IMO he really detracts from Mr. Spock's backstory without adding much of anything besides making it more convoluted.
I still haven't finished S2 of DSC, so the jury is still out for me on that.How I feel about Michael Burnham.
I'd say that Spock is probably the most well known character in the entire franchise. I have a feeling that if you stopped any random person on the street, they would have at least a vague idea who Spock is, even if they had never watched a single episode of any of the Star Treks.Arguably? Try definitely.
Nicholas Meyer said in his TWOK commentary that he started the movie on a closeup of Spock's ear because he figured that was the one element that everyone knew from Star Trek.I'd say that Spock is probably the most well known character in the entire franchise. I have a feeling that if you stopped any random person on the street, they would have at least a vague idea who Spock is, even if they had never watched a single episode of any of the Star Treks.
This. Trek is very silly, and I don't "get" why some of the silliness is okay but other parts arent. Real life has some shit and nonsensical episodes and movies too but they still happened.
Unless they think Darth Vader is from Star Trek.Stop a stranger in the street, ask them what they know about Star Trek, and they'll probably say "the dude with the ears".
In retrospect, I kind of wish they'd just stuck with that. Or at the very least, waited to undo it until the Enterprise novel storyline actually got to 2161, so Trip could've been part of the crew during the Romulan War instead of dangling on the end of 31's fishing line for years.If it's canon it should be acknowledged, or at least not contradicted.
Unless it's Trip's death in Enterprise.
How does a fictional person wrote an autobiography?How is it an autobiography is someone else writes it?![]()
The same way Jessica Fletcher did with all those Murder She Wrote books.How does a fictional person wrote an autobiography?
Which was kinda confusing. That program was set in 2161, but Trip’s death was faked several years before that. Did section 31 create several years of life for Trip in the official records?In retrospect, I kind of wish they'd just stuck with that. Or at the very least, waited to undo it until the Enterprise novel storyline actually got to 2161, so Trip could've been part of the crew during the Romulan War instead of dangling on the end of 31's fishing line for years.
How is it an autobiography is someone else writes it?![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.