There have also been rumors of a new bodyguard for Thrawn, taking Ruhk's place.
Well I mean Ruhk died at the end of Rebels so it makes sense.
There have also been rumors of a new bodyguard for Thrawn, taking Ruhk's place.
I could see Wes Chatham playing Vanto, but with Pellaeon in the mix that character would be a little redundant since both characters performed the same basic function in their respective books. Another noghri bodyguard seems possible, and technically feasible after . . .From the newer Thrawn novels, Eli Vanto. Thrawn's personal aid and originally translator when he joined the Empire. Character was from Wild Space and had at least some knowledge of the Chiss at first meeting.
This kind of thing drives me nutty especially in articles when it's obvious in their very own stories that the casting isn't a late addition. As a journalist, I find that phrasing soooo weird.Also, kinda funny the way the articles are written you'd think this is still happening, when in reality they started filming almost a year ago, and wrapped back in November. "late addition to the cast" indeed!
Doubly funny that they imply Tennant is also a late addition when they said literally just a week ago that Tennant recorded a scratch track for his lines so they could play them on set with the puppet, making him a decidedly early addition to the cast.
I realise this is an artefact of the way articles are padded out when they don't have anything substantive to add that isn't already in the headline, but still...
I swear most articles I read these days are 90% padding that feels like it was copy-pasted from a wikipedia article. And don't get me started on the repeated redundant statements, and the statements that redundantly repeat information that do nothing but make one even more confused when scrubbing through looking for an actual quote, or source, or anything substantive or contextually relevant.This kind of thing drives me nutty especially in articles when it's obvious in their very own stories that the casting isn't a late addition. As a journalist, I find that phrasing soooo weird.
At this point, the shows really aren't "EU" or "second tier", they're right up there with the movies as the core part of the franchise. Hell, with the way things have been the last few years I'd actually put them above the movies in terms of significance to the franchise.If its a mess with Thrawn then it gets filed with the rest of the EU. If it's ok then ok, and it will feel out the second tier SW content after the OT.
Second tier for me.At this point, the shows really aren't "EU" or "second tier", they're right up there with the movies as the core part of the franchise. Hell, with the way things have been the last few years I'd actually put them above the movies in terms of significance to the franchise.
Just because you don't like something, doesn't make it less important to the overall franchise.Second tier for me.
And...? No where did I argue otherwise.Just because you don't like something, doesn't make it less important to the overall franchise.
To me. That's the important part. How important they are to LFL or fans is no concern of mine.You said they were "EU" and "second tier" which would imply they're less important than the movies.
But this isn't a personal opinion situation, it's a fact for everyone that they are equal to the movies.To me. That's the important part. How important they are to LFL or fans is no concern of mine.
I was just stating my opinion. Nothing more; nothing less.But this isn't a personal opinion situation, it's a fact for everyone that they are equal to the movies.
No, you were being deliberately obtuse and facetious. That is how you roll. At least have the backbone to be upfront about it.I was just stating my opinion. Nothing more; nothing less.
I tier out SW content. That's how I roll.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.