Well-said.If that's what enraged people, then people are either idiots that don't understand words, or are wilfully misinterpreting the intent of that statement.
What she said was correct; there is no definitive source material for Star Wars to adapt in the sense that there is for 'Harry Potter', or 'The Lord of the Rings', or 'Sherlock Holmes'. There's just what George did, and a whole bunch of licenced fan fiction that they can cherry-pick or not as they see fit, as it should me.
Also; are people really so deluded as to think that George would have treated the post-RotJ EU any differently than he did literality anything else in the EU? Do they seriously think that *anyone* at Lucasfilm, regardless of leadership, or what studio owns them would have decided to directly adapt 'Heir to the Empire', or 'Dark Empire' for the big screen? It was never going to happen, and good thing too. That would have been terrible, and a financial disaster.
I heard many of the same arguments (no doubt from many of the same people or at least kinds of people) about Indiana Jones!
"They need to make 'Fate of Atlantis' as a movie! That's what Indy 4/5 should have been! Grrrr! Wimmin!"
Uh, no. Not a single creative in Hollywood worth their salt would have accepted the gig of adapting a 30-year-old video game as the next Indy movie. Not one. Terrible idea that, fortunately, would never happen in the real world.