Conversely, there might be horrid slumps, plagues, unrest and crime at any era the writers want, with Kirk, Pike or Picard oblivious to it because they are in outer space.
Mark Twain realised the ugly truth even if Picard and crew did not ....
Conversely, there might be horrid slumps, plagues, unrest and crime at any era the writers want, with Kirk, Pike or Picard oblivious to it because they are in outer space.
So Starfleet and the UFP have begun to spread out and expand and map the territory of known space, but they've seen enough to know that they've still only seen a fraction of what's out there, with lots more to discover.KIRK: We're on a thousand planets and spreading out. We cross fantastic distances and everything's alive, Cochrane. Life everywhere. We estimate there are millions of planets with intelligent life. We haven't begun to map them. Interesting?
That sounds WAY too huge to me, and I have trouble reconciling it with what we hear about the Federation and Starfleet in TOS, what with Kirk's "There are only 12 like it in the fleet" comment about the Enterprise in "Tomorrow is Yesterday" and the fact that most Starbases we hear mentioned are only in the single or double digits. (There's a mention of a "Starbase 200" in "The Alternative Factor", but as that's such an odd episode in nearly every aspect I have no problem dismissing it as an outlier.)Agreed, except it was mentioned in DSC that 2250's Starfleet consisted of 7,000 ships.
That sounds WAY too huge to me, and I have trouble reconciling it with what we hear about the Federation and Starfleet in TOS, what with Kirk's "There are only 12 like it in the fleet" comment about the Enterprise in "Tomorrow is Yesterday" and the fact that most Starbases we hear mentioned are only in the single or double digits. (There's a mention of a "Starbase 200" in "The Alternative Factor", but as that's such an odd episode in nearly every aspect I have no problem dismissing it as an outlier.)
In the TNG era, sure, I can believe that Starfleet's that big. In the TOS era, I have trouble believing that they had 700 ships total, let alone 7000. I'd probably put it at closer to 100-200 ships total, counting things like freighters and transport vessels in addition to starships.
Starfleet may have been more of a collection of ships running through their member world's operating authority's at the time. The Vulcans had at least one all-Vulcan ship, and Enterprise was a UESPA operated ship. It stands to reason there were Tellarite ships, etc. It might have been easier logistically to provide for member nation's needs on most of the ships, (comfortable gravity, lack of smelly humans, no Andorrians messing with the thermostat). Some species might just prefer not to be as involved in that capacity.From an in universe perspective 23rd century Starfleet operated a human male dominated club, even 100 years after the UFP was formed. Not good optics.
I honestly haven't decided if I think that DSC can fit into the Prime Timeline or not. I'm still making my way through season 2 (just finished off episode 3 last night), so I'm going to have to see what they end up doing with Pike, Spock, and Number One before I know how I feel about it. But right now, it seems like most of their problems could've been avoided if they'd just set the show further into the future rather than 10 years before TOS.Yeah, it's just a nonsense number that some shithead scriptwriter had Cornwell say just to make Starfleet sound badass, but doesn't really make any logical sense. All they had to do was know that the highest NCC number at the time was 1701, and just say that Starfleet had 1,700 ships. But apparently the scriptwriters were not that smart.
Either that, or this is yet just another example of how the Discoverse is not the prime universe.
On the topic of if the 23rd Century was when Starfleet was at its peak or not, I immediately think of this quote of Kirk's from "Metamorphosis":
So Starfleet and the UFP have begun to spread out and expand and map the territory of known space, but they've seen enough to know that they've still only seen a fraction of what's out there, with lots more to discover.
I also have a memory of reading in one of the TNG magazines at the time of that show's premiere that Starfleet had mapped only 4% of known space in the TOS era, but by the TNG era it was up 11%. So they've doubled and nearly tripled their mapping of known space by the 2360s. That works for me.
That sounds WAY too huge to me, and I have trouble reconciling it with what we hear about the Federation and Starfleet in TOS, what with Kirk's "There are only 12 like it in the fleet" comment about the Enterprise in "Tomorrow is Yesterday" and the fact that most Starbases we hear mentioned are only in the single or double digits. (There's a mention of a "Starbase 200" in "The Alternative Factor", but as that's such an odd episode in nearly every aspect I have no problem dismissing it as an outlier.)
In the TNG era, sure, I can believe that Starfleet's that big. In the TOS era, I have trouble believing that they had 700 ships total, let alone 7000. I'd probably put it at closer to 100-200 ships total, counting things like freighters and transport vessels in addition to starships.
I got the dialogue directly from Star Trek Script Search.Didn't Kirk tell Cochrane in "Metamophosis" that "We're on a thousand worlds".
not really, we know from the example of spock's mother that humans are on vulcan. that would be one of the "we're on." in addition to human colonies, there are other species (fed members and non-members) home worlds, their colonies, worlds being studied/explored, worlds being mined, etc..Didn't Kirk tell Cochrane in "Metamophosis" that "We're on a thousand worlds". That implies a thousand Earth colonies,
Galaxy Class Starships - When Hotels Go To Space for TNG reminds me of French Pre-Dreadnoughts - When Hotels Go To War by Drachinifel. The Federation HQ is located in Paris, France, so, maybe history is repeating itself.I'd say the 'peak' was probably the early 2360s - the Galaxy-class development appears to be such a bold statement of intent, such resources thrown at creating this colossal new explorer etc.
The Galaxy Class was designed to be a detachable liner/hotel section plus a battle section. Supporting the liner/hotel section wasted power and resources when in battle environments. In the big battle scene in DS9 where we see several Galaxy Class ships in combat, I'm surprised that they didn't dump their saucers prior to the battle.The TMP—Excelsior era has the best look...had I not known what Ent-D was, I would have called it a liner
In the big battle scene in DS9 where we see several Galaxy Class ships in combat, I'm surprised that they didn't dump their saucers prior to the battle.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.