• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Thats it. I dont consider Disc , SNW , or Picard cannon

Status
Not open for further replies.
I used to not be able to stand majel in any episodes when I was younger, but now, I enjoy your you're right. She also had some of.her best episodes in ds9. Shes also.my favorite computer voice.

But you must admit, there are far too many shows or movies that were brought back that the original fans, simply hate..I think the main issue is, the media corporations are too desperately trying to appeal to modern "likes" and dislikes, and appeal to our modern social media generation style of "thought" (if it exists), and forms and patterns of communication and jokes etc, which logic and reason have a very small part of in today's culture if any at all. This makes them change legacy shows, movies, and especially the characters and storylines to be sensible to today's "culture", thinking they will please everyone, only to.end up confused wondering why people didn't like it..

Well of course there were many core fans who didn't like it. They deal with modern culture daily. Sometimes we want to watch something to escape our modern reality. We don't want to watch characters in a fantasy or sci-fi movie or show, behave and talk like it is 2023. That's what's unappealing. If people loved tng because they spoke professionally, for the most part, and most episodes dealt with philosophical, or ethical, or moral issues, then give us that.

I'll tell you one thing. I can fall asleep to Berman Era trek or tos very easily. It's almost asmr in quality..but definitely not with new trek.
Shows back then engaged our minds and hearts more. Shows today feels like being on some thrill ride or roller coaster. It's not the same.

I see where you are coming from, and there are arguments that a more "middle ground" approach could have been taken but, with how poor representation has been historically, not just in Trek but in general, it is important to ensure this trend is reversed.

It may seem extreme when compared to "old trek" but for those of us from marginalised communities it feels amazing to see people we identify with when we never have before.

Hugh Culber in Disco is probably my favourite character from that show - not only because of seeing someone I'd consider a masculine gay man on TV but not taking the Will and Grace approach of almost playing him straight but because he is funny, charming, loving, and more.

Lower Decks harkens back to Berman Trek the most of the shows (Prodigy also) but I get the "period piece" approach where the sociolect and idiolect of the characters was uber classical and, in a way, professional - I do think there is space for all kinds though and seeing people speak more "naturally" is good to see too (for me).

Tilly is one who wouldn't fly back in the olden days but, as someone who embodies that intense passion for their job and that "feels too much"/"tries too hard" with people due to their own insecurity she really resonates with me.

Growing up my favourite characters were Bashir and O'Brien - true guy love (before Turk and JD made it cool in Scrubs) but also seeing a proper working class block in O'Brien having been brought up in that environment was class as he was never judged for being a bit "rough around the edges", then Julian being shit around women and just awkwardly clueless in social circles too.

My love for Picard himself came from him reminding me of my grandparents a bit and just being so composed (definitely not always but my child brain skimmed that stuff out) and he was almost how I aspired to be.

What new era Trek and the style of dialogue shows for me is that anyone can be accepted (my accent has caused me trouble at times in my career - to the extent of being told to modify it when I was younger) whereas Old Trek was much more stuffy and with age it gives a vibe of trying to make people conform to a very white and upper middle class persona which is something that put many people off pursuing those kinds of job roles in my peer group, and still limits access to many people from minority backgrounds.

This is not to slag off Old Trek - god dammit (using Vince McMahon voice) I love the shows - but I find the personalities more relatable in new trek these days
 
Last edited:
What they like and you don't and vice versa.

I just don't see these things that way, anymore. I used to be a real raging asshole about it, but finally figured out it was a waste of time and added nothing to my life. My two least favorite current shows, Discovery and Picard, are not any less "real Trek" than any other or any that have been made under the franchise's banner.

The current shows are just made by different people with different life experiences, just like every other Trek show.
 
I won't lie, my chances of going back to rewatch much of PIC outside of Season 3 are minimal. But it's just as real a version of Star Trek as TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY or ENT. If sucky Trek I didn't feel like revisiting defined my love for the material I'd have abandoned the franchise during VOY.
 
I won't lie, my chances of going back to rewatch much of PIC outside of Season 3 are minimal. But it's just as real a version of Star Trek as TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY or ENT. If sucky Trek I didn't feel like revisiting defined my love for the material I'd have abandoned the franchise during VOY.

I envy that you found something of value in Picard.
 
After Season 2 I was worried this year would be a tire fire. But it was just the right combination of goofy and substantive for me.

It'll never be one of Trek's shining seasons but it was better than last year and that was a big gesture.
 
I just don't see these things that way, anymore. I used to be a real raging asshole about it, but finally figured out it was a waste of time and added nothing to my life. My two least favorite current shows, Discovery and Picard, are not any less "real Trek" than any other or any that have been made under the franchise's banner.

The current shows are just made by different people with different life experiences, just like every other Trek show.

Its like the age old metal v nu metal, debut album v 10th anniversary big release stuff in music.

People do get protective of what they love, especially when younger, and I got it (and still do) from people with my music taste. My go to is ska punk/trapcore/post hardcore and the like which isn't seen as "high brow" music.

People often feel the need to drop one thing to enjoy another thing too as if they can only like so much at one time - I am, in the least classy way of saying it possible, a music and TV whore. I just absorb so much, from almost any genre, and rarely find something I truly dislike or hate as I seem to always find a silver lining or something to connect with.

The downside of that is I often have no idea the name of the band, or the episode, or the actor but I'll just have it knocking about in my brain waiting to be referenced!

I don't think there is anyone, after my first month or two here where I got into some beef over Brexit (one area I am very single mind on) and something around the benefits of seeing a counsellor/therapist, who I have fallen out with or had an unpleasant discussion with which makes my overall experience more enjoyable.

I'd rather engage with people who I disagree with and find our points where the Venn diagram of our opinions crosses over so we can then understand why we have differing opinions and when we understand each other we can then appreciate the view even if we don't agree.

This spiel definitely makes me sound like a pretentious knobhead or like I'm putting myself on a pedestal as a paragon of virtue and it definitely isn't - I'm just a blue sky thinker who will do anything to be able to speak to as many people about Star Trek as possible because I damn well can't in real life as the only Trekkie I know is my mother and she doesn't have the same need to get forensic with it
 
Its like the age old metal v nu metal, debut album v 10th anniversary big release stuff in music.

People do get protective of what they love, especially when younger, and I got it (and still do) from people with my music taste. My go to is ska punk/trapcore/post hardcore and the like which isn't seen as "high brow" music.

People often feel the need to drop one thing to enjoy another thing too as if they can only like so much at one time - I am, in the least classy way of saying it possible, a music and TV whore. I just absorb so much, from almost any genre, and rarely find something I truly dislike or hate as I seem to always find a silver lining or something to connect with.

The downside of that is I often have no idea the name of the band, or the episode, or the actor but I'll just have it knocking about in my brain waiting to be referenced!

I don't think there is anyone, after my first month or two here where I got into some beef over Brexit (one area I am very single mind on) and something around the benefits of seeing a counsellor/therapist, who I have fallen out with or had an unpleasant discussion with which makes my overall experience more enjoyable.

I'd rather engage with people who I disagree with and find our points where the Venn diagram of our opinions crosses over so we can then understand why we have differing opinions and when we understand each other we can then appreciate the view even if we don't agree.

This spiel definitely makes me sound like a pretentious knobhead or like I'm putting myself on a pedestal as a paragon of virtue and it definitely isn't - I'm just a blue sky thinker who will do anything to be able to speak to as many people about Star Trek as possible because I damn well can't in real life as the only Trekkie I know is my mother and she doesn't have the same need to get forensic with it

I would like to clarify that the word spiel in German means a game. I always thought it meant this in English too, based on how it's used. "His spiel is to encite sympathy", can be thought of either saying his speech, or his game plan, either way, both translations work. Just an FYI :)
 
The more things change...I joined a local Star Trek fan club back in 1989. I'd been a fan since I first started watching TOS in syndication in the early 70s, so I had some small cred even amongst older fans, but I joined the club mainly because I was enthusiastic about the then-new series, TNG. And I and a few others spent the next several years defending TNG to the older members as "real" Star Trek. Cue an endless series of conversations starting, "Well, but you know, Bren, you have to admit that TOS is just better, and surely no one could ever love that stuffy Picard as much as the real captain...."

I don't think we ever did win them over; I think we finally all just agreed to disagree. Then came DS9, and with it the insistence that a show that took place on a space station (and hadn't been created by Gene Roddenberry) couldn't be "real" Star Trek. :rolleyes:

And here we are all over again. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
Someone twenty years from now "I miss Kurtzman Trek. What we have now is garbage!" And so on, and so on.
I will not touch that bet. If I live long enough, and Trek makes it to one more iteration (or set of them), I am mortally certain I'll hear those words.
I've been a fan for nearly half a century. I don't need the Purity Battalions to show up and test my urine for proof of fandom
You and me both, bro. Hell, if they show up at my door they'll get smacked in the head with a crate or two of fanzines -- that's how long I've been in fandom!
 
The more things change...I joined a local Star Trek fan club back in 1989. I'd been a fan since I first started watching TOS in syndication in the early 70s, so I had some small cred even amongst older fans, but I joined the club mainly because I was enthusiastic about the then-new series, TNG. And I and a few others spent the next several years defending TNG to the older members as "real" Star Trek. Cue an endless series of conversations starting, "Well, but you know, Bren, you have to admit that TOS is just better, and surely no one could ever love that stuffy Picard as much as the real captain...."

I don't think we ever did win them over; I think we finally all just agreed to disagree. Then came DS9, and with it the insistence that a show that took place on a space station (and hadn't been created by Gene Roddenberry) couldn't be "real" Star Trek. :rolleyes:

And here we are all over again. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

I will not touch that bet. If I live long enough, and Trek makes it to one more iteration (or set of them), I am mortally certain I'll hear those words.

You and me both, bro. Hell, if they show up at my door they'll get smacked in the head with a crate or two of fanzines -- that's how long I've been in fandom!


I'm sorry, but your experience is irrelevant. Sure I pine on and on about real fans who were watching the classic (and much better shows btw) live, but you're comparing apples to oranges.

When tng was coming out barely, legacy showrunners etc and creators were pretty much at the helm of tng. And even further on the spirit and heart of trek was maintained up untjl enterprise.

At that point, no one had yet seen a spinoff based on a different Era and different captains. It was only normal for the majority to be suspicious of it and while watching it, constantly reminisce of the old captain. But when tng got good. Especially when best of both worlds came out. Things began to change.

When ds9 was coming out, they were already following a similar formula although changed up to differentiate itself from tng. But Roddenberry may have been alive while ds9 was conceived, and alot of the ideas and format of tng was Roddenberry. DC fontana was still writing for tng also as well as tos.

IT was a time where this bebavior made sense. It was the first time, after 20 continuous years of knowing one captain throughout like 20 years or more of his life.

Of course there were always the types of fans who were easily hyped and excited for a new show, because a wealthy corporation who provided your entertainment and perhaps your life values and your guide on how to behave in life, said so. You probably just wanted to be excited and like it to fit in, just as you probably would have for any hyped show at the time even if it wasn't trek. I'm sorry but a lot of people are this way. They get swept away by the hype and excitement and want to belong. You are this way which is why when the st 2009 movies and onwards came out and the new shows. You just decided not to criticize it or compare it to the old shows at all and just decide to like or love it so that if you do discuss new trek or appear at conventions with random strangers, you don't show yourself as some "grumpy" unsatisfied person. You are the type to want to fit in and appear happy and "current with the times", so that's why you accept new trek so much and try to compare today's complaints with the complaints during tng.

Tng came out at a time when a spinoff was unexpected, and ds9 came out when a spinoff of a space station was unexpected. But guess what happened? People converted because ALL those spin off shows had AMAZING story telling and episodes and deep characters, episodes like the emissary, BoBW, All good things, q who, Past tense, caretaker, Duet, Darmok, Timeless, etc. They won the fans over and proved them wrong by virtue of being amazing. By year 5 of tng, the complaints and "hate" was gone for the most part, and each subsequent show got less hate and was quickly adopted and beloved.

But it's been 6 years since discovery and a earth shattering FOURTEEN YEARS since star trek 2009, the moment the alternate timeline was created by the clueless mistake of careless writers who don't care much for trek by destroying Romulus. That action created the disc, SNW, and Picard universe. The real future timeline as glimpsed in tng, or voy, NEVER had Romulus destroyed. This event changed everything that's why I consider the whole Romulus destroyed non Canon and any show that accepts Romulus being gone as "Canon", is not canon imo at all and part of some alternate timeline that the time ship relativity will correct once COMPOTENT writers and showrunners are placed at paramount. As I was saying, it's been FOURTEEN YEARS, and you still have half or more than half of the fans STILL saying it's bad, in fact it's getting even worse. All you have to do is look around, one example is the yt channel major grin, to find out how they went from minor negativity and cynicism. To outright just not even being surprised or disappointed at any of the new shows or episodes because by this point they expect nothing but disaster and failure, even fourteen years later. Many people are even seeing through the Picard season 3 hype and pointing out all the ridiculous nonsense in it which I would also had it not been for the spoiler rules.

There is a massive difference to your claim of tos fanboys in the 80s who quickly died out, to the Neverending disappointment thays lasted 14 years with not an IOTA of indication that it will be stopping, and with every indication that it's going to continue getting even worse. If you want to like new trek just becsuse paramount releases a show titled "star trek" by name so you can appear happy and fit in well at the new conventions and not look "grumpy" or be thought of as a "loser who just can't accept the times and that's why no one likes him and he can't make friends, and we all know everyone should have friends, any friends, otherwise they're not cool and will be made fun of. Which is bad", then fine, go ahead, but don't compare your hype and excitement and desire to fit in always, and your experiences with fanboys of 1987 who died out by the time BoBW came out in like 1990, with the current fans who STILL despise new trek not less, but MORE AND MORE BY THE DAY
 
I'm sorry, but your experience is irrelevant. Sure I pine on and on about real fans who were watching the classic (and much better shows btw) live, but you're comparing apples to oranges.

It's not apples and oranges, it's exactly the same. Certain fans will always hate the new and cling to the old; you see it in every continuing media franchise out there, whether film or TV. You want Trek to stay the same, but that's a sure path to ensuring its destruction. The 90s Trek shows weren't made for older fans of TOS, they were made for the then-current generation, just as today's shows are. S3 of Picard is the only one built around nostalgia for the past - the other shows have to move forwards, not backward. Even SNW is a radically different interpretation of the TOS era. Trek simply has to target new generations in order to survive. Older fans have a choice: accept the new or reject it. Neither choice changes the fact that nu-Trek is as much real Star Trek as any other.

There is a massive difference to your claim of tos fanboys in the 80s who quickly died out, to the Neverending disappointment thays lasted 14 years with not an IOTA of indication that it will be stopping, and with every indication that it's going to continue getting even worse.

You are describing YOUR experience, YOUR disappointment - these are things that nobody can change. Clearly they're not emblematic of the majority's opinion, otherwise Star Trek would have died out long ago. There wouldn't be five shows with more on the way and regular TV movies planned. These things are happening because the revival of Star Trek has been a success. That doesn't mean every show is unanimously beloved (I personally dislike the first two seasons of Picard, prefer the first two seasons of Discovery to the latter two, and still haven't warmed to Lower Decks) but it does mean that Star Trek has achieved what it wanted to do since DISCO started in 2017; capture a new generation of fandom while retaining the interest of many older fans too.

It might no longer have your interest, but it doesn't need it. The shows you love will always be there, but the insistence on maintaining the formula of the 90s shows is what led to franchise fatigue and the end of Enterprise. Star Trek has to evolve, and I'm glad it's in the place it's in right now.
 
When discovery came out it was a surprise to me..believe me I was excited and even watched episode 1 and kind of liked it. But it spiraled down from there.
Also I really really like prodigy. There. I actually get excited for a new prodigy episode. It's the only new trek so far I'm happy about. Because they made their legacy characters just how they were back then. Janeway is the same janeway. So is chakotay. Starfleet looks hopeful. The kids are really likeable and sweet. That's what I love about the federation's values.
Look you can like and dislike whatever you want. Nobody is forcing you to change that opinion.
I just don't see the point of making a thread that's just a loud and long announcement about how you don't "consider it canon". Because the people owning the IP do consider it canon, and they are the ones with the say.
Why is it not enough to just not watch them?

I'll tell you what, I don't mind lower decks, I just can't stand today's humor, can't they try to make it sound like the "24th century" tng style and create humor based on that rather than today's style?
Personally I don't think Berman era Trek (or TOS Trek or movie Trek) was particularly funny, especially not funny enough (and especially especially not consistently funny enough) to carry a whole comedy series. So in my opinion a comedy show employing the kind of "humour" employed in TNG would be a miserable exercise in misery.
Besides that a modern show will have to employ modern sensibilities. Same reason why you can't have the characters on SNW behave like people from the 1960s.
Besides that I (obviously if you look at my avatar :-P ) think the humour and writing style is very good, definitely in the top tier of modern comedies for me.
 
After Season 2 I was worried this year would be a tire fire. But it was just the right combination of goofy and substantive for me.

It'll never be one of Trek's shining seasons but it was better than last year and that was a big gesture.
Interesting. I thought both Seasons 2 and 3 were made at the same time so I figured they would be about equal quality. Do you think maybe it having all the TNG cast back made it more enjoyable or was it just a better story or both (or none of the above)?
 
Both. 2 would have been a narrative mess no matter what and COVID filming restrictions just made a dodgy story idea even worse.
 
Of course there were always the types of fans who were easily hyped and excited for a new show, because a wealthy corporation who provided your entertainment and perhaps your life values and your guide on how to behave in life, said so. You probably just wanted to be excited and like it to fit in, just as you probably would have for any hyped show at the time even if it wasn't trek. I'm sorry but a lot of people are this way. They get swept away by the hype and excitement and want to belong. You are this way which is why when the st 2009 movies and onwards came out and the new shows. You just decided not to criticize it or compare it to the old shows at all and just decide to like or love it so that if you do discuss new trek or appear at conventions with random strangers, you don't show yourself as some "grumpy" unsatisfied person. You are the type to want to fit in and appear happy and "current with the times", so that's why you accept new trek so much and try to compare today's complaints with the complaints during tng.

Okay, I have given you numerous breaks, and tried to guide you toward a more productive style of posting. That obviously didn't work.

I'm telling you now, as clearly and directly as possible: STOP insulting your fellow members by assuming you know their motivations and preferences. @Brennyren has been a good member of this board for 20 years. You've been here 5 minutes. You really think you know why she likes what she likes?

There's no more leeway on this issue. Just STOP. Criticize the shows all you like, Keep the fans (i.e. members) out of it. Formal warnings will follow.

And I mean this with all sincerity: you might benefit from stepping away and doing something else for a while. Being this angry about TV shows can't be healthy.
 
You think you're the only writer that can give me that Rick Berman feeling, I GOT TWENTY WRITERS UNDER CONTRACT I CAN ASK FOR A BERMAN TYPE THING FROM!
 
Things don’t become non-canon just because I, personally, don’t like them. Otherwise I’d have to write off most of Voyager, two seasons of Enterprise, one season of TNG and half the movies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top