• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Tarantino and Abrams to Do Next Trek Movie

Tarantino isn't the first Director to push actors too far into doing their own stunts, or turn a blind eye to unsafe situations and not heed warnings about unsavoury characters. As far as dangers you can mitigate against, there are people who's job it is to ensure stunts work to plan and they'll have sat in that car and done that exact same sequence themselves personally. Surely QT trusted them, and did whatever he did to provoke Thurman to act in a certain way in the scene. Yes, I can believe there are some Directors who'll behave like tyrants purposely to get a response from an actor that probably wouldn't ordinarily be capable of delivering that intense. It's a weird schizophrenic business is show.
Unfortunately it's what it's connected to that makes all this a bit more than that. We have a female actress who was sexually assaulted by a producer and threatened by said producer. We have a Director who forced her into a dangerous stunt in which she was injured, then Director and Producer kept evidence of the stunt from her for 15 years so she couldn't sue. She also said that in the scenes of Kill Bill where she was strangled by chains and getting spit in the face it was Tarantino on the other side doing those actions. It all paints an unpleasant picture of two powerful men against a young woman. Sure, Tarantino confronted Weinstein over what happened but how many years ago was that? How many more years did they work together? I don't know the whole picture of course and there could be more to it but there are no studios around today that want to be connected to anything like that.
 
Integrity? How about fear? Studios fear the backlash, and conclusive proof is no longer necessary in this day and age. The fear of loss of revenue and public condemnation seem to be enough.
In the article, Thurman says that QT eventually stood up for her against Weinstein. That should work in his favor. He is not being accused of any sexual impropriety. It was an on set mistake. He and Miramax probably responded the way they did due to advice from lawyers. I think there is a backlash brewing against the ruination of people who are only tangentially connected to these crimes. Exile the actual perpetrators, but you can't throw everyone on the ash heap. People should know going forward that the rules have changed.
 
That article was Shatner talking about 60s Kirk being able to be on screen due to technology NOT QT saying he wanted Shatner. Grain of salt needed IMO
 
In the article, Thurman says that QT eventually stood up for her against Weinstein. That should work in his favor. He is not being accused of any sexual impropriety. It was an on set mistake. He and Miramax probably responded the way they did due to advice from lawyers. I think there is a backlash brewing against the ruination of people who are only tangentially connected to these crimes. Exile the actual perpetrators, but you can't throw everyone on the ash heap. People should know going forward that the rules have changed.
So Miramax and Tarantino are poor victims of their evil lawyers?
It wasn't as if Thurman twisted her ankle on set and was suing them for millions. She nearly died. They should have apologised, paid her compensation without the need of court action.
If they are suffering backlash now - well good. Its about time.

Obviously Tarantino didn't mean it to happen and in retrospect no-one should have been driving that car. Not Thurman, not even a trained stunt-driver. It was an accident but Tarantino should have manned up at the time, It doesn't mean Tarantino is a bad person by those actions alone. I'm hoping he's learnt his lesson.
 
Honestly, it isn't even just the car accident. He's crazy, he spit on her and choked her for 'the scene' and there are accounts from others also saying something similar for other movies. Honestly he isn't the kind of director I'd personally advise anyone to work with. I don't think anyone should be given the permission to make an actress feel so unsafe and humiliated on set.

His connection to Weinstein was bad enough but now this...
 
That article was Shatner talking about 60s Kirk being able to be on screen due to technology NOT QT saying he wanted Shatner. Grain of salt needed IMO

It's like any project. The actors can gush all they want about returning but it's wether the filmmakers have something for them to play.

And the QT stuff is horrible. The film is just bring written, there is no confirmation about it bring made. Paramount can fire him if they feel they should. For now Trek 14 may be in development hell. His films have never been to my taste anyway.
 
Honestly, it isn't even just the car accident. He's crazy, he spit on her and choked her for 'the scene' and there are accounts from others also saying something similar for other movies. Honestly he isn't the kind of director I'd personally advise anyone to work with. I don't think anyone should be given the permission to make an actress feel so unsafe and humiliated on set.

His connection to Weinstein was bad enough but now this...
Yeah, I see Paramount cutting and running on this one.
 
Well, Paramount certainly needs Tarantino more than he'll ever need them. So it'll be interesting to see how this all plays out.
 
Well, Paramount certainly needs Tarantino more than he'll ever need them. So it'll be interesting to see how this all plays out.

Regardless of what they do, soldier on or cut bait, it is just more PR egg on Paramount's face where Abrams Trek is concerned.
 
In light of recent events, perhaps all Star Trek XIV really needs is JJ Abrams... since he's involved anyway.

Picking QT's brain over story ideas just confirms what they already should've realised about the kind of film it needs to be.
 
Last edited:
They move forward with Tarantino, and they'll be criticized. They cut bait, and they'll be criticized for not knowing more about someone they were going to hand one of their prime franchises to.
They were going to be criticized no matter what.

Also, I was more confused by the statement "More PR Egg with regards to Abrams Trek." How much egg is there to begin with?
 
They were going to be criticized no matter what.

Also, I was more confused by the statement "More PR Egg with regards to Abrams Trek." How much egg is there to begin with?

You have the production mess that was Star Trek Beyond, the apology tour for Into Darkness. I'd call both of those PR egg.
 
Tarantino has done a big Deadline interview about the Kill Bill accident etc so maybe that will smooth everything over now
 
https://jezebel.com/heres-audio-of-quentin-tarantino-defending-roman-polans-1822745916


Please, this man can't get more problematic and delusional. I'm beyond disgusted.
If Paramount&co don't distance themselves from him now, they not only are desperate but they deserve to crash and burn and with them their trek because it is obvious they don't care about it and its cast and they have zero integrity.
Tarantino isn't the only f.director of Hollywood! And trek of all the things doesn't need him and his "style". Please let's not be ridiculous, he isn't the only person who could make a movie and not even the one who could make a good one (I don't even think his trek would be that good)

I'm over the circle jerk attitude of these white dudes who think they can say and do whatever they want and it is no big deal and of no consequence.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top