Meeting Lyco took place after Bad Batch. Note there are Imperial Stormtroopers not TK Troopers in the episodes.A thought. Does the fact Lyco wasn't with Ventress when she showed up on Bad Batch mean anything?
Meeting Lyco took place after Bad Batch. Note there are Imperial Stormtroopers not TK Troopers in the episodes.A thought. Does the fact Lyco wasn't with Ventress when she showed up on Bad Batch mean anything?
It's worth remembering that being Dathomirian is like being Corellian or Coruscanti. It's not a matter of species so much as it is of nationality (planetality?) Hence; Maul is a Dathomirian Zabrak.Wookieepedia cites Morgan Elsbeth as either human or Dothomirian, depending upon the source being cited. She certainly looks human.
From https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Morgan_Elsbeth#Massacre_of_the_Nightsisters:
Morgan Elsbeth was a Dathomirian born on[5] the Outer Rim Territories[9] planet Dathomir[5] and was was a member of the Nightsisters,[1] a coven of witches native to Dathomir.[10]
From https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Nightsisters#Overview:
Most Nightsisters were Dathomirian,[2] but members of other species, such as[31] the human[52] Morgan Elsbeth, could be part of the coven.[31]
Nah, it just means precisely what it says: very similar to human but not actually the same species as human. There's no insinuation of supremacy on either side.I really don't like the EU term "Near Human". It always had a certain human supremacist undertone to it.
Sorry autopiloted. The lead great mother is played by Claudia Black so I refer to her as Morrigan.Who the hell is Morrigan?
She tried calling but all she got was a message saying the number was disconnected.If Ventress wanted to find Vos, why didn't she go to Coruscant after being resurrected?
that's not what "literally" meansthis episode literally steamrolls everything known about the Force.
George Lucas reportedly was extremely upset with Palpatine being resurrected despite groundwork laid in his own prequels and various technobabble provided within Rise of Skywalker to at least give the character's resurrection some believability. One can only imagine his reaction on Ventress being resurrected after being dead for months (per Dark Disciple) by being dumped into a Lazarus pit.that's not what "literally" means
See? It doesn't even make sense. Who claimed he was upset, the usual internet trolls with an established track record of putting their own opinions out there and attaching his name to them?George Lucas reportedly was extremely upset with Palpatine being resurrected despite groundwork laid in his own prequels
Neither, Ian McDiarmid himself: https://www.imdb.com/news/ni62729866/See? It doesn't even make sense. Who claimed he was upset, the usual internet trolls with an established track record of putting their own opinions out there and attaching his name to them?
This has gone too far. Is there a reason you're taking this to a personal level? Reported for the uncalled for profanitybullshit.
Neither, Ian McDiarmid himself: https://www.imdb.com/news/ni62729866/
Because when we did ‘Return of the Jedi,’ and I was thrown down that chute to Galactic Hell, he was dead. And I said, ‘Oh, does he come back?’ And [George] said, ‘No, he’s dead.’ So I just accepted that.
It brings you back from the dead after those two weeks? Yeah, that’s a miracle cure; I’ll take it.A process that required two weeks of intravenous treatments and ensuring the subject was in stasis immediately post death seems to be hardly a miracle cure. The transporter is better.
And that ignores all the points I made. Well, enjoy the "miracle cure."It brings you back from the dead after those two weeks? Yeah, that’s a miracle cure; I’ll take it.
It just says he thought Palpatine was dead in 1983. But we all know that.No where in that article does Ian say George was upset.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.