• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Tales of the Underworld

Wookieepedia cites Morgan Elsbeth as either human or Dothomirian, depending upon the source being cited. She certainly looks human.

From https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Morgan_Elsbeth#Massacre_of_the_Nightsisters:

Morgan Elsbeth was a Dathomirian born on[5] the Outer Rim Territories[9] planet Dathomir[5] and was was a member of the Nightsisters,[1] a coven of witches native to Dathomir.[10]

From https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Nightsisters#Overview:

Most Nightsisters were Dathomirian,[2] but members of other species, such as[31] the human[52] Morgan Elsbeth, could be part of the coven.[31]
It's worth remembering that being Dathomirian is like being Corellian or Coruscanti. It's not a matter of species so much as it is of nationality (planetality?) Hence; Maul is a Dathomirian Zabrak.

As for what species Ventress is; I think given that she has the same alabaster complexion as Talzin, the simple answer there is that she's also Dathmiri. That is to say; the original Nightsister lineage from the Witch Kingdom of Peridia. Whether they're human, or human related* is unknown, but probably a pretty safe bet, so far as Star Wars bothers to worry about such things. Which honestly it shouldn't overmuch, given that it's much more fantasy than sci-fi.

I will say that I've long held as my head-canon the notion that Dathmiri are an all-female mono-gendered species that has to mate with males of other compatible races to reproduce, and their sons are always the same species as the father, and their daughters are always Dathmiri. That I think, neatly accounts for why the Nightsisters don't have any obviously Zabrak-hybrid sisters in their ranks, and the Nightbrother clan likewise doesn't have any hornless albinos (that we know of, anyway.) It also easily uncomplicates any discussion about whether Maul and Ventress are hybrids.

As for Elsbeth; I thinks it's no more complicated than her and her mother were adpoted into the clan, which is a thing that's been known to happen (see the "Bug" short story.)

* I really don't like the EU term "Near Human". It always had a certain human supremacist undertone to it. Fine if it's just the Imperial military throwing it around, but as an acceptable term in pretty much any other context or era, it just doesn't sit right with me. Mind you I'm also of the opinion that pretty much every Star Wars species that looks basically human but with other bits (Twi'leks, Togruta, Zabrak, etc, etc) all share some common ancestor with humans. Whether it's the result of natural selection, or ancient genetic engineering to adapt to alien environments prior to terrorforming in the galactic pre-history days of colonisation is an open question.
 
I really don't like the EU term "Near Human". It always had a certain human supremacist undertone to it.
Nah, it just means precisely what it says: very similar to human but not actually the same species as human. There's no insinuation of supremacy on either side.
 
Yeah, I imagine the events of Dark Disciple had to have occurred in the very last days of the war before the Siege of Mandalore. And who knows how long Ventress was stuck on Dathomir before getting off world?
 
Last edited:
Hilariously a canon trading card for Quinlan Vos that escaped proper oversight (I assume) said that Quinlan got together with Khaleen Hentz after hiding from Order 66 (presumably pulling from his Legends backstory). It'd be funny if this is why Ventress can't get back to him and not some gobbledybook about removing attachments to resurrect from a Nightsister Lazarus pit (Jedi should technically all be resurrected since they don't have attachments--just one way this episode literally steamrolls everything known about the Force. And people were mad about midichlorians?)
 
that's not what "literally" means
George Lucas reportedly was extremely upset with Palpatine being resurrected despite groundwork laid in his own prequels and various technobabble provided within Rise of Skywalker to at least give the character's resurrection some believability. One can only imagine his reaction on Ventress being resurrected after being dead for months (per Dark Disciple) by being dumped into a Lazarus pit.
 
George Lucas reportedly was extremely upset with Palpatine being resurrected despite groundwork laid in his own prequels
See? It doesn't even make sense. Who claimed he was upset, the usual internet trolls with an established track record of putting their own opinions out there and attaching his name to them?
 

Nowhere in that article does Ian say George was upset.
In fact, he doesn't even say he asked George this after getting the Episode 9 role, he's talking about asking him back when filming ROTJ.
Because when we did ‘Return of the Jedi,’ and I was thrown down that chute to Galactic Hell, he was dead. And I said, ‘Oh, does he come back?’ And [George] said, ‘No, he’s dead.’ So I just accepted that.

This is the same George who wanted to bring Maul back, I'm sure he'd be fine with the Ventress resurrection. Wouldn't even be surprised if Filoni talked with him first.
 
Last edited:
A process that required two weeks of intravenous treatments and ensuring the subject was in stasis immediately post death seems to be hardly a miracle cure. The transporter is better.
It brings you back from the dead after those two weeks? Yeah, that’s a miracle cure; I’ll take it.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top