Nature vs. nurture vs. free will and personal agency is a multi-lateral tug of war that can have a greater or lesser influence on a person's world view and sense of morality depending on any number of other external factors. It's never as simple or straight-forward as some are making it out to be. Being raised by a monster doesn't make you a monster, and many a monster had good, well adjusted parents. Indeed in the case of the former, that can often have the opposite effect. We always have a choice.
Keeping in mind for a second that we're talking about made-up stories that a crafted for entertainment, not the validity of the psychological underpinnings; Typically in most of these what if/alt timeline scenarios Clark is still at his core, the same person. Even the "Red Son" version of him had the same basic driving motivation; he wanted to do good and thought he was ultimately doing the right thing as he understood it. In the case of Justice Lord Superman, he had the same upbringing as the "normal" version, but events drove him down a certain path, and at a critical juncture he made a choice. The objective evitability of that outcome was proven when "normal" Clark was presented with a similar scenario and chose differently.
Keeping in mind for a second that we're talking about made-up stories that a crafted for entertainment, not the validity of the psychological underpinnings; Typically in most of these what if/alt timeline scenarios Clark is still at his core, the same person. Even the "Red Son" version of him had the same basic driving motivation; he wanted to do good and thought he was ultimately doing the right thing as he understood it. In the case of Justice Lord Superman, he had the same upbringing as the "normal" version, but events drove him down a certain path, and at a critical juncture he made a choice. The objective evitability of that outcome was proven when "normal" Clark was presented with a similar scenario and chose differently.
Last edited: