^ And James Gunn echoed that in one of the recent Peacemaker podcasts.
Not unsubstantiated at all, as stated above both Nolan and Gerwig deliberately delayed both going to VOD and streaming precisely to draw more to the Cinema. Praise and interest simply aren't enough.Again, yours is built on hollow, unsubstantiated claims about the desires of innumerable moviegoers, which you are incapable of knowing. What is known is that the near-universal praise / interest in Barbie and Oppenheimer was the only logical reason for the films' remarkable theatrical success. You can try to "level" the audience interest playing field (to aid the now-sagging MCU) with baseless claims as much as you like, but your underlying message created to protect the MCU of recent years is inapplicable to Barbie and Oppenheimer. Audiences who found many of the recent years MCU films lacking (or flat out awful) made that discovery in the theatres, hence the quickly sinking box office during their runs, which is verifiable..
In a similar fashion, Superman is specifically being put on VOD early to complement the release of Peacemaker. I guess the strategy can work both ways.Not unsubstantiated at all, as stated above both Nolan and Gerwig deliberately delayed both going to VOD and streaming precisely to draw more to the Cinema. Praise and interest simply aren't enough.
And the advertised worldwide VOD release is US only. Great.
I just saw it available in Canada. Cineplex tells me I really want it.
I'd squint pretty hard at that offered rationale, TBH.In a similar fashion, Superman is specifically being put on VOD early to complement the release of Peacemaker. I guess the strategy can work both ways.
Not unsubstantiated at all, as stated above both Nolan and Gerwig deliberately delayed both going to VOD and streaming precisely to draw more to the Cinema. Praise and interest simply aren't enough.
The other great Superman production of the 21st century.Went off to start watching Superman & Lois on HBO Max.
If he were, he'd have overruled the general and sent ICE after the Kryptonian.I walked into this movie thinking that Lex Luthor, the word's greatst criminal genius was already president, so intermittently I remembered that thing is something I should keep my ears pricked up about...
I've only seen it once, maybe a month ago.
Other than the General acting like it was a regular sales calls, when Lex was trying to push him into a war, unless I missed something obvious, they didn't say that he wasn't the President, so long as he is an undivested industrialist unconcerned about the safety of his electorate.
I'm like %99 sure he's not the Prez, but I'm suggesting there may be some grey smudge in the story where up is down and cats are marrying dogs, so did they actually %100 prove somewhere in the film that he wasn't POTUS?
If he were, he'd have overruled the general and sent ICE after the Kryptonian.
I liked the way Gunn used the audience's presumed familiarity with the 1979 film and, to a lesser degree, the Routh movie to subvert expectations at two points:Well, I had doubts, but I had fun. Even my wife liked it, but mainly because she loves doggies.
It leaned a bit more on the 1979 film than a new film should have, but what the hell.
That's mainly Snyderbots, you can ignore themWatched it for a third time, this time at home. I am just dumbfounded that there are people out there that say there is nothing redeeming about this film.
Even the FOX News watching, Trump loving member of the household said it was a great movie when it was over. Went off to start watching Superman & Lois on HBO Max.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.