Yes, John Byrne's The Man of Steel in 1986 (although it wasn't a mirror, but a polished piece of the hull of Kal-El's rocket, since a regular mirror could never survive Superman's heat vision). That's what I was alluding to.
Instead of going that route with Lois, what's the problem with casting a good actress at least a bit closer to Hoechlin's age/appearance?
Lois is supposed to be an experienced reporter by the time Clark shows up on the scene with her Superman interview being her breakout story (in some incarnations).
I don't get that either. My first choice is Haley Attwell as I mentioned earlier.
I'm guessing that's not what one would want as Lois
what's the problem with casting a good actress at least a bit closer to Hoechlin's age/appearance?
Meaning I believe Posey looks like her near fifty years (she will be 50 this November), and I'm guessing that's not what one would want as Lois opposite 30 year old Tyler Hoechlin. Unless there's some on-screen statement that Superman is far older than anyone imagined, it would be reasonable to assume he's around the actor's age, and if that's the case, then Lois should not be 20 years his senior, but somewhere around his age (at least that's the impression one gets from other productions, such as the Donner Superman film or the Lois and Clark TV series).
While the film business has a long history of casting older actors as younger characters, it does not always work when the actor's appearance does not play as the character's age. For example, I never thought Andrew Garfield was a believable high school-aged Peter Parker as he looked every bit his 27-28 years (his age during the production of The Amazing Spider-Man). There was no way he was some fresh-faced 17 year old by any stretch of the imagination. Instead of going that route with Lois, what's the problem with casting a good actress at least a bit closer to Hoechlin's age/appearance?
You would be guessing wrong, since nobody else seems to have a problem with it...![]()
Nice try turning it around, but this line of conversation came about from you having a problem, specifically with an older actress possibly playing a romantic interest for a younger actor. And I could go over your post line by line on why it isn't a problem, neither from in-universe chronology, nor from real world ages, but let's cut the bullshit, you're just being sexist and ageist here.
his really just boils down to your belief that men should be older than women in a relationship, which is archaic sexist crap.
If this was a case of a 50 year old actor cast as a romantic partner for a 30 something actress you wouldn't bat an eye.
What "no one else?" Anyone involved with casting? Here? There's already other men[mer's choices for actreses other than Posey,, so you have no point...not an unusual position for you. No one would be incorrect in saying Parker Posey would not be selected for Lois Lane. Cry
Only you have the problem, since your quotes in my reply are filled with your typical flames and politicized nonsense.
In several casting examples of Clark and Lois, the performers have been around the same age:
That's no coincidence. Superman and Lois are not supposed to have a couple of decades between their ages. Cry about that as much as you like, but there's more live action casting evidence of the list being the norm than anything you will ever cough up.
- Dean Cain (born 1966) / Teri Hatcher (born 1964)
- Christopher Reeve (born 1952) . Margot Kidder (born 1948)
- George Reeves (born 1914) / Noel Neill (born 1920)
- Brandon Routh (born 1979) / Kate Bosworth (born 1983)
Two, what is not crap is that for all of your would-be Throne of Judgement finger pointing, I will return the favor and remind you of your real issues: your White Privilege mindset (recognized by another member) in the Black Lighting thread where you dropped your utterly false "toxic masculinity" crap on a black character (Khalil) without even a particle of understanding the struggles of young black males and why he made the choices seen in the show--which were all there to be seen in script and performance, but that did not matter to you, as you were sitting on that Throne of Judgement about a kind of person (and character) you know absolutely nothing about, so you fell back on a common racist charge against young black males shared by white liberals as well as conservatives.
let's not go through the charade of denying it, alright?
The Bullshit Tricorder just exploded...and dodge's post is the reason why...
Any reason thought that the idea of an older Lois (or even an older actress playing a younger Lois) is so objectionable?
I remember all this and there's a real risk of a derail here, but I don't recall you really presenting a reason why Khalil being black made the interpretation of the character fundamentally different per se. When legitimately asked about how you'd see the character playing out differently as an economically disadvantaged white man (and crucially, how and why any judgement would change as a consequence of skin colour) you were at best vague. This isn't meant as an attack, but rather a question about how you saw that thread in such a different light to others posting there.
your racist mischaracterization of the Khalil character was splattered all over that thread and is there to be seen.
Superman and Lois are not supposed to have a couple of decades between their ages.
FWIW, it's not "always." Amy Adams is nine years older than Henry Cavill. To me, it's part of what makes their dynamic charged and sexy, and a highlight of the DCEU.Why must they always be a couple years apart?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.