KRAD said:
No -- we actually do have some standards.....Ah, sorry about that, boss. I thought you had a SCE/COE story. My bad.
(I'm kidding Ted. Really. Put down that hammer.....)
![]()
Heeeeeeeere's Teddy!

--Ted
KRAD said:
No -- we actually do have some standards.....Ah, sorry about that, boss. I thought you had a SCE/COE story. My bad.
(I'm kidding Ted. Really. Put down that hammer.....)
![]()
TG Theodore said:
KRAD said:
No -- we actually do have some standards.....Ah, sorry about that, boss. I thought you had a SCE/COE story. My bad.
(I'm kidding Ted. Really. Put down that hammer.....)
![]()
Heeeeeeeere's Teddy!
--Ted
Smiley said:
"So a Horse Walks into a Bar...": Tying Vic Fontaine's origin to the computer-inhabiting AI from early DS9 is a cool concept, and the characters are well-written. I choose not to accept this origin, though, mostly because I don't think that the alien would have such a keen grasp on 1960s Las Vegas slang.
Although there are no more volumes in the foreseeable future, two things could have bumped that number up considerably. First, I would have liked more stories that feel like they could be lost episodes of the series. Second, since nothing new was added to Trek canon during the year, there should have been more stories that added something new to the mythos or chronicled events beyond what we've seen before.
Smiley said:
The Strange New Worlds stories, being short fan fiction, are always hit or miss.
Smiley said:but that has little to no impact on the reading experience.
Jim Johnson said:
Smiley said:but that has little to no impact on the reading experience.
Ah, but it should, to some extent. SNW stories are professionally edited and are held to a standard set forth by Pocket Books and the Star Trek licensor (and the contest rules). Fan fiction is not held to that same standard and fanfic stories are rarely edited by a professional editor.
Lorraine Anderson said:And I agree with you, but where was the copy editor that let numerous references to "Janet Lester" go through? (S/B Janice Lester.) Threw me out of the story every time.![]()
Jim Johnson said:
Lorraine Anderson said:And I agree with you, but where was the copy editor that let numerous references to "Janet Lester" go through? (S/B Janice Lester.) Threw me out of the story every time.![]()
Well, yeah. There is an exception to every rule, and it turns out SNW 10 has a few exceptions.![]()
Yeah, look at the loser they hired to write their first Farscape novel -- and then they brought in that same useless hack to write the first Andromeda novel!Remember, folks, Tor Books -- one of the best publishing houses for SF in general, but they seem determined to sabotage every tie-in licence they get.
Smiley said:
So noted, Jim. I meant it in the sense that each SNW collection has no set plan or theme beyond including contest winners for every series
KRAD said:
Yeah, look at the loser they hired to write their first Farscape novel -- and then they brought in that same useless hack to write the first Andromeda novel!Remember, folks, Tor Books -- one of the best publishing houses for SF in general, but they seem determined to sabotage every tie-in licence they get.
![]()
Yup. I was all set to write the fourth Farscape book, but Henson's lawyers and Tor's lawyers couldn't get on the same page. And then the show was cancelled, and Tor lost interest in using up any more of their lawyers' billable hours on a contract that seemingly would never be signed to do a book based on a cancelled, low-rated series.Maybe it's not Tor's fault that there were only three Farscape novels; I seem to recall hearing that there was some difficulty elsewhere.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.