• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

STO: The Needs of the Many cover.

I have heard that to ensure it fits with the spirit of the game they are going to modify the language slightly from what we normally get in a Star Trek book:

Captain Del Boy of the USS Kentucky Fried Chicken hailed his counterpart Captain Wanko of the USS Bum Clown - "holy shit, did you see that? It was awesum. LOL!"


And crews full of create-a-character random aliens all wearing different make-your-own-uniforms!

The Captain surveyed his bridge. It was a colourful sight, his suspiciously all-male crew wearing infinite seemingly random variations of every Starfleet uniform ever made, including elements of uniforms from a parallel universe that no-one in this timeline should really know anything about. Lt. F4ceSm45H was jumping up and down on the spot at his station, while Commander DeathKill42 was pressing up against the wall, seemingly in an unsuccessful attempt to get though the door to the conference room.

Upon seeing the captain, Lt.F4ceSm45H ran backwards from his panel into the main viewscreen, then, gaining some semblance of his bearings, leapt forwards over the helm console at a diagonal angle while crouching and came to a halt in front of the captain.

“OMG Lolz” said F4ceSm45H.

“Yeh look @ DeathKill42 twat can’t even use teh door” his captain replied.

“Such a n00b”
 
Do people really want this book? Considering how often Pocket Books tell us they have limited publication space in their schedules, wouldn't we rather have another book based on one of the series (seeing as we don't get many these days anyway)?

I'm sure it'd sell better than a book based on a game, and aren't they all about the sales these days?

I think the number of people who play MMORPGs these days is probably bigger than the number of people who read media tie-in novels. This is hardly a scientific survey, but I get 57.6 million Google hits for "Star Trek Online" versus only 43,900 hits for "Star Trek novels" and 59,600 hits for "Star Trek books."

So I think your assumption that a book based on STO would sell more poorly is probably incorrect.
I got 43,000,000 hits for star trek books; 3,720,000 for star trek novels; and 27.700,000 for star trek online. books has got it beat. how did you type it in? I did all lowercase words with spaces between them. You get different results depending on what you do, obviusly. But i'm interested in how you entered the search parameters
 
Do people really want this book? ...
... aren't they all about the sales these days?

It will be bought by all of the completists, of course, but also by people who are intrigued by ST gaming. Potentially a different demographic.

I was surprised when the "Star Trek: Klingon" and "Starfleet Academy" CD-ROM games were novelized. I don't play the games (but I did buy these two as games, and "Star Trek: Borg", anyway) but the novelizations were great.

And Pocket's always been concerned with sales.
 
...This is hardly a scientific survey, but I get 57.6 million Google hits for "Star Trek Online" versus only 43,900 hits for "Star Trek novels" and 59,600 hits for "Star Trek books."

So I think your assumption that a book based on STO would sell more poorly is probably incorrect.
I got 43,000,000 hits for star trek books; 3,720,000 for star trek novels; and 27.700,000 for star trek online. books has got it beat. how did you type it in? I did all lowercase words with spaces between them. You get different results depending on what you do, obviusly. But i'm interested in how you entered the search parameters

If you just enter it that way, without quotes, then it's not searching specifically for the phrase, just for any site that contains all three words, not necessarily in that order or anywhere near each other in the document. So that would give you a ton of false positives, hits that have nothing to do specifically with Star Trek novels or Star Trek Online. To avoid false positives, I searched for the exact phrases, which you do by putting quotes around them.

Although, granted, given how common a word "online" is, I'm sure there are a number of sites that have the title Star Trek immediately followed by the word "online" without being specifically about the game Star Trek Online. So that figure is sure to include a fair number of false positives, but it's so much huger than the book results that the margin for error probably doesn't change the results.
 
Interesting, I always used to put periods between the words when I wanted an exact phrase match and I generally found what I was looking for fairly quickly.

Different strokes.
 
I wasn't aware of the period thing, but I don't see why you'd think it would make any difference in search time. However, when I try it with the periods, I get about 11 million more results.
 
I will probably pass on this, as I don't need any more new continuities right now, and video games give me a headache.
 
Out of curiousity, when was this book originally announced? I swear I don't remember seeing anything about it until I first saw this thread.
 
^It never really got an announcement the way the other 2010 novels did, but it began showing up on Amazon and such without ceremony a few months ago.
 
^It never really got an announcement the way the other 2010 novels did, but it began showing up on Amazon and such without ceremony a few months ago.

Ah, I see. Thanks, Christopher. On a side note: I'm planning on picking up The Buried Age in a couple of days(have to wait until I get paid, unforunately) since I've heard so many people saying good things about it.
 
I probably won't play the game, but I'll definitely read the book. I like the concept, I'm just not much of a gamer.
 
A few years ago I might bought Star Trek Online, although I don't bother with PC games anymore now I have the PS3. What are the chances of a paired down version being released for the PS3 or XBox 360?
 
Does anyone know if the game can be played just as a single player game? I have zero interest in the whole gaming-with-people-around-the-world thing.
 
Does anyone know if the game can be played just as a single player game? I have zero interest in the whole gaming-with-people-around-the-world thing.


Yes, you can play alone all the concept missions and patrols. (but you are going to see ppl on space, starbases and all that), but i am not sure if only with missions and patrols you can complet the game.

BTW, i am going to buy the book. I cant stand that we dont have a TNG book this year (only a Titan book for all TNG fans??), looks like pooket forgot about TNG fans, well.. thats why i am more intresting on STO books now.


Sorry for bad english
 
Does anyone know if the game can be played just as a single player game? I have zero interest in the whole gaming-with-people-around-the-world thing.

That's really my thing about MMO's in the first place - if I wanted to interact with other people while I'm gaming, I wouldn't be playing a computer game.

Regardless, the combination of STO and Star Wars The Old Republic is wearing me down...
 
BTW, i am going to buy the book. I cant stand that we dont have a TNG book this year (only a Titan book for all TNG fans??), looks like pooket forgot about TNG fans, well.. thats why i am more intresting on STO books now.

The concluding Typhon Pact novel, published in January 2011, will be a TNG novel. A publishing year pretty much runs from one February to the following January, so in a way, the year ends with a TNG novel. (And a January book will generally begin going on sale in late December anyway.)

And just because a single year is lean on a certain series doesn't mean Pocket has "forgotten" that series. Every year is scheduled differently, and if a given series is underrepresented one year, it may have a large presence a year or two later. Nothing is "forgotten," because in publishing you need to have a long attention span and plan well in advance. But you can only fit so much in a mere twelve months.
 
Well, i just hope that in 2011 we get a bit more TNG.. but with all the new JJTrek movie thing and all the hate that Star Trek has now (when i said Star Trek i mean old and "real" time line, new time line its not Star Trek to me) , mi hopes are really dawn..
 
Well, i just hope that in 2011 we get a bit more TNG.. but with all the new JJTrek movie thing and all the hate that Star Trek has now (when i said Star Trek i mean old and "real" time line, new time line its not Star Trek to me) , mi hopes are really dawn..

What hate?
 
Well, i just hope that in 2011 we get a bit more TNG.. but with all the new JJTrek movie thing and all the hate that Star Trek has now (when i said Star Trek i mean old and "real" time line, new time line its not Star Trek to me) , mi hopes are really dawn..

Maybe there's a language issue here... you don't seem to understand yet that Pocket will not be publishing books based on the new movie. They were going to, but the books were removed from the schedule.

And interest in something new does not equal hate for something old. It's possible to love more than one version of a story at the same time.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top