• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Starship Design in Star Trek: Picard

0.12%? It cost around thirty thousand USD to rent the boat for four days back in 1994. The initial budget for Generations was twenty-five million USD, but it ballooned an extra ten million due to production underestimates and reshoots (it cost five million just to redo an initially rejected famous death scene). Renting the boat didn't break the bank, Kirk did.
While I agree with your overall assessment - it's known that Star Trek movies is where Shatner and Nimoy made most of their money (I think just their salaries accounted for like 25-30% of the TOS movie budgets) - I bet it was still pretty expensive actually location shooting on the boat, even if the rental itself wasn't outrageous.
 
While I agree with your overall assessment - it's known that Star Trek movies is where Shatner and Nimoy made most of their money (I think just their salaries accounted for like 25-30% of the TOS movie budgets) - I bet it was still pretty expensive actually location shooting on the boat, even if the rental itself wasn't outrageous.
Plus the costumes.
 
While I agree with your overall assessment - it's known that Star Trek movies is where Shatner and Nimoy made most of their money (I think just their salaries accounted for like 25-30% of the TOS movie budgets) - I bet it was still pretty expensive actually location shooting on the boat, even if the rental itself wasn't outrageous.
Nah, it was far more expensive to build the stellar cartography set than to rent the boat. Could they have saved money by not bothering with that sequence at all and just have it be a small ceremony in Ten-Forward? Definitely. But it didn't really impact the movie's budget like others things like the aforementioned reshoots did. The problem was that the movie had a small budget to begin with, forcing the producers and other bean-counters to cut corners wherever they could while still trying to make the movie look more than a two-part television episode.
 
The problem was that the movie had a small budget to begin with, forcing the producers and other bean-counters to cut corners wherever they could while still trying to make the movie look more than a two-part television episode.

Half the time they couldn't even afford to turn the Enterprise's lights on...
 
It's the year 2402. If engineers and detailing teams can't repaint the hull of a starship with a new name and in very rapid time then Starfleet doesn't deserve to be out in deep space.
Hopefully they don't use this guy.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I believe the story is that the Duras sisters were supposed to have been in a Vorcha-class ship, which they obviously already had a model of....but would have had to blow it up. To avoid that, they just stuck with the BoP and the existing footage that had been used a mere 1 movie/3 years prior.

Honestly, had they simply shown the BoP landing more shots and having a few more tricks up their sleeves to thwart the E-D crew's attempts to defend themselves, I wouldn't have had a problem with it. Why the D only fires ONCE the entire time is ridiculous. Plus the BoP misses a good number of shots she takes!
 
Urgh. From Terry Matalas:

Well, I love seeing the origin story of the new Enterprise. At the same time, the Titan was such a -- I would be clear to the fans that the Titan name will live on. There will be another ship, the Titan-B, that will go on, and probably be a cool version of a new Luna class out there. But this ship is definitely a Constitution-class throwback, and we wanted it to feel like a scrappy Enterprise. It wasn't as bulky as the E, and it wasn't a battleship like the E or the F. It was an underdog like Kirk's ship was.

The Enterprise was not "scrappy"! WTF? Underdog? When they were writing TOS the Enterprise was supposed to be the largest thing put in space by the Federation. Where the heck do we get "underdog" from that?

The only time she was ever outclassed was when some super power like the Fesarius or the Metrons showed up or when she was outnumbered 3 to 1.

In her day she was HUGE. And in real life she still is! It wasn't until Star Trek started getting Star Destroyer envy that we had anything bigger.

People are weird.
 
What? He's talking out his butt again..
Tos Enterprise wasn't small and scrappy, it was a modern ship of the line that the klingons and others feared. Even by ST 6 time. It was never an underdog. Ugh..
The Disco crew were practically drooling when they saw the Enterprise at the beginning of Season 2 of Discovery.

Hell, the show made a point to mention they kept her out of the Klingon War because she was "the best of Starfleet." Underdog? I think not.

Lord Terry, you should know better if you're gonna be the Patron Saint of Star Trek.
 
Last edited:
Just to bring the topic back to PIC, Bernd has now added all the starships seen in Season 3 to his list on Ex Astris Scientia! He doesn't add any BTS information on the starships nor anything said on twitter by Matalas or Dave Blass. He does mention something being 'almost official lore'. I do take Bernd's opinion in high regard given the amount of work he's consistently put into his site and I use it as a resource often and browse through it while I'm at work :whistle:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top