• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Starship Design in Star Trek: Picard

I think the Inquiry classes in the fleet were from STO, or inspired by the details STO added. I can see a Registry number and RCS thrusters in places identical to what STO did
unknown.png
Hm, maybe not, the STO model doesn't have that glowing blue area on the top of the nacelle. Maybe they modified it, because the placement of that RCS thruster
unknown.png


The Season one model only had RCS thrusters on the inward facing sides of the nacelles, not the outside.
 
Last edited:
I still don't get how the "first ship of the class" doesn't have the same name as the class, or visa versa. Also why it isn't an NX-....
It's probably because the art department and the ship designer were not informed of what exactly the writers had in mind. Besides, the Stargazer is described both as "the first of a new class of ships" and a "refit" which shows that even the writers weren't too sure.
I can rationalize the Stargazer being a fairly recent Sagan-class ship (as per the designer) that has been refit with Borg technology and therefore the prototype for a new "generation" of ships.
 
The first ship of a class doesn't always have to bear the name of the class. Was it canonically established that there was a USS Galaxy? Wasn't the Enterprise-E the first Sovereign class? As for the NX registry, that's only for the testing phase. When they get put in service, it switches to NCC.

That would explain the NX/NCC part. USS Galaxy (NCC-70637) was supposedly involved in a couple battles in the Dominion War™, among other references. https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/USS_Galaxy
 
Pretty sure you are allowed to not name the ship class after your first ship. Especially if such a class exists already.
Like, the Ent-E being the first of her kind, but a "Enterprise class" already existing - just name the damn thing after a testbed, prototype built, or the production codename ("Souvereign" sounds like a good WIP-name for the development of the new flagship type).

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Well isn't that just adorable?
I have to say - I'm not that big a fan of most ST:O designs themselves. But they're prefect to fill the screen with diverse background ships! And the hero ship - the Stargazer - is a good new design.

Personally I always liked the idea that no two ships are 100% identical. ENT touched upon that with the NX-02 being slightly different than the NX-01, and all the Miranda variations and even the Ent-B hull vs. the regular Excelsior fits that. That seems to be the assumption whenever it's just two (or a handfull ships) meeting. But whenever there's a giant fleet (Dominion war, here), they have to fill up with similar looking ships. Here, it works great, because some ST:O ships look like simple overhauls/refits/facelifts of a lot of existing ships.
 
That thing was so ugly it's beautiful!

I actually have both the Voyager and Maquis Raider kits sitting on my shelf, ready to be built into a studio-scale YeagerBeast. :D

Going to build a Centaur as well.
 
Hm, maybe not, the STO model doesn't have that glowing blue area on the top of the nacelle. Maybe they modified it, because the placement of that RCS thruster
unknown.png


The Season one model only had RCS thrusters on the inward facing sides of the nacelles, not the outside.
Is that a itty bitty Phaser Array Strip Segment on the outsides of the Warp Nacelle?

Why implement such a small array?

Cute.

Fans are now emboldened.
YES!
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top