It really doesn't.Which goes to show how much TOS canon and continuity mean to the current powers that be.
It really doesn't.Which goes to show how much TOS canon and continuity mean to the current powers that be.
I'm told they make an old ship look new again, or something.Hey - refits happen![]()
Did I miss a memo? If not, it is canon. Which goes to show how much TOS canon and continuity mean to the current powers that be.
CBS re-canonized it in the early 2000sTAS is not canon
TAS is not canon (even if some of the elements are used in the liver series) so cartoons don't count.
I'm told they make an old ship look new again, or something.
Probably not.Or fans can act like adults and just accept they are ALL the Enterprise made by different productions.
CBS re-canonized it in the early 2000s
Probably not.
This fight has been going on for far too long.
We are on a Trek board discussing a Trek show. What problems do you want to address and why are we doing them on a Trek board?It never amazes me how petty fans can be especially when there are real problems to address.
We are on a Trek board discussing a Trek show. What problems do you want to address and why are we doing them on a Trek board?![]()
Not really sure how the TPTB could be more supportive from CBS' end.Poor writing, bad direction, a lack of support from TPTB, the lack of interest of Trek in General Public and of course Global Warming![]()
For now...It actually is canon.
Not really sure how the TPTB could be more supportive from CBS' end.
Yeah, well, people don't like things being behind a paywall. That's a complaint I get."If CBS really cares why they don't put new Trek on live TV" -- I'm so sick and tired of hearing this.
Been going since TNG and TMP, so it's not going away. Any change is regarded as "an insult." Fans are fanatical (something odd about that phrasingAnyway my point is that there are far more interesting topic to debate than how the position of the pylons on Disc Enterprise makes it non-cannon and it's an insult to fans (not this fan, I love the call back to Phase II Star Trek).
Yeah, well, people don't like things being behind a paywall. That's a complaint I get.
Here's a thought: if you don't want to see the shape of starship pylons debated how about you don't click a thread that is specifically about starship design?Anyway my point is that there are far more interesting topic to debate than how the position of the pylons on Disc Enterprise makes it non-cannon and it's an insult to fans (not this fan, I love the call back to Phase II Star Trek).
Yes, 'over the air' reception has always and still exists; but Cable/Satellite, etc. was NEVER free. (and yes, I know you're not the one complaining here - but yeah, never understood that argument from people who used to watch - or still watch - the various Star Trek series on Cable/Satellite.)
Bittorent already existed in 2001Pretty much.
I missed the last season of Voyager and the first two seasons of Enterprise due to the fact my Sat TV provider didn't carry UPN and such..I had to have it videotaped (LOL) and mailed to me by my grandparents two weeks at a time.
It sure did! You know what also existed?Bittorent already existed in 2001
Ah the golden age of c-band wildfeeds and forum mods looking away when ENT discussions about a new episode started a day before it aired on UPN![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.