• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Starship Design in Star Trek: Picard

Another example is the B-52 where the oldest frames are expected to see a century of flight.

Yep, and the B-52 is an interesting example, because its service life has proven far longer than its actual production life (the time period where it was being actively manufactured). B-52s were only built for about a decade before newer designs were in favor and it became just a matter of upgrading the ones already constructed. But the service life has been multiple decades because it's a very good design.
 
https://twitter.com/BuckAdmiral/status/1637840600824266752/photo/1

None of the designs outside of the Intrepid here are canon, it's just Bill's design lineage
bteTvjv.png



It's dramatic

The nacelles on the Chaparral are much better than the official ones on all the PIC ships. Although I still really like the Intrepid design.
 
Nah, it looked scary as it was.

Agreed. Just having a ship posturing aggressively while clearly being at least the tactical match of the Titan-A even when the Titan-A was having a good day made it threatening. Also, why would an outwardly regular Starfleet ship look evil?
 
Huh.. I'm not a fan of tacked on, and the 4 torpedo launchers on the neck look,.. well tacked on...
Quit easy to make that better.. and this is the drawing, not the model. so maybe they fixed it??
 
Nah Picard did it better


we saw Sovereigns, Akiras and Lunas were still in service in Season 2.
True, but some of them were getting a bit long in the tooth.
Also keep in mind that the late 2370s represented the Federation's next great technological leap forward. The classes you mentioned were part of the "TNG era". Then came the Dominion War, and all the tech development associated with that, and the return of the Voyager, and all the tech it brought back as well. The 15 years between 2375 and 2390 saw the introduction of, among other things: the protostar drive, the slipstream drive, advanced isolinear/bioneural computing, holomatter-based interior transformation, and shuttlecraft replication in situ.
 
Agreed. Just having a ship posturing aggressively while clearly being at least the tactical match of the Titan-A even when the Titan-A was having a good day made it threatening. Also, why would an outwardly regular Starfleet ship look evil?
Have to be intimidating sometimes.
 
Yep, and the B-52 is an interesting example, because its service life has proven far longer than its actual production life (the time period where it was being actively manufactured). B-52s were only built for about a decade before newer designs were in favor and it became just a matter of upgrading the ones already constructed. But the service life has been multiple decades because it's a very good design.

Another thing to keep in mind is the so-called "technology deveopment cycle", very often, by the time a new ship or plane is actually put into service, it's obsolete, or at least no longer SOTA. That's why they're already talking about the end of the F-22 Raptor program. They're not even considering updates to them, but going straight to the NGAD (Next Generation Air Dominance) program.
 
U.S.S Titan NCC-80102-A Constitution III-class starship
What are your thoughts? How many Variants of the Constuion class are they trying to make?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top