Starship design history in light of Discovery

Discussion in 'Star Trek: Discovery' started by INACTIVEUSS Einstein, Nov 18, 2017.

  1. Timo

    Timo Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    I'm not seeing "out of sequence" in the Nazi numbering scheme. However, wartime construction very much involved a "skipping numbers" scheme, with a thousand registries allocated to a specific batch even if barely 400 got built, and the next batch (or subtype, or even all-new class) in turn comprising 300 boats starting at the next even thousand, and so forth.

    This might be close to what Starfleet is doing, with the first two digits of a five-digit registry mercilessly rolling over at some set timepoint or whatnot even though construction hasn't yet filled the last three digits up to 999.

    The Kriegsmarine number-skipping wasn't rigorously done to provide each new boat type with a nice and round "1 number", either: U-1001 did not differ from U-1000 or U-999, even though U-3001 and U-5001 represented all-new designs. Again, Starfleet might be guilty of this, not every prototype with an initial NX registry having three zeroes or a 001 at the tail end of the registry.

    Ultimately, the Nazis constantly adjusted their system to account for changes in production - both utopian fantasies of increased production and realistic downscalings. Again, I see Starfleet doing the same as their strategic position changes (especially as the Klingon threat ebbs and flows). Modern "peacetime" navies may not be good comparison points in any of the above three respects. Although they do account for the one overriding concern: whether it's cool. Which is why the USN chose SSN-21 rather than SSN-774 for the Seawolf, purely to highlight the "this is a future wondersub for the 21st century" thing.

    Timo Saloniemi
     
    Syd Shanshala and Rahul like this.
  2. Rahul

    Rahul Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2014
    Indeed. I think people were projectin waaay to much onto the NCC numbering of Federation vessels. There could be a bazillion reasons for why the numbering is the way it is, that we simply don't know about.

    I always think of the Oberth-class starships (like the USS Grissom) as a completely different type of vessels than the "usual" hero ships. In that those are usually heavy armed, and multi-purpose. Wheras we have never seen an Oberth-ship during a battle - they usually get blown away pretty fast.

    It be the difference between an aircraft carrier, and a civilian boat that is operated by the Navy. So it would make sense those ships follow a completely different numbering scheme (5 digit, because they probably built a lot more "civilan" starships than military ones) than the "usual" Starfleet ships.

    In the same way, the USS Kelvin might simply have been an older ship, where the Federation gave it a three digit number. And then later, they decided ships with that type of mission profile should be grouped in a 4 digit number scheme, so somebody simply painted a zero before the original number.

    With stuff like this, real life is usually way less organized and clean than a fictional universe would be. So it's actually pretty realistic that the numbers are all over the place. It's not like stardates - which really should follow a logical scheme. Starship registries is a result of human decisions and retroactive sorting - it should be a mess.
     
  3. Syd Shanshala

    Syd Shanshala Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2017
    Ahh yes ok I couldn’t remember exactly what was said about the Uboats, glad you can set the record straight. This line of thinking regarding registries certainly makes sense in my head cannon!
     
  4. DEWLine

    DEWLine Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2003
    Location:
    Ottawa, Canada
    Sequential works. Let's keep it.
     
  5. cooleddie74

    cooleddie74 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Location:
    The Warped Sector of the Demented Quadrant
    If you believe some lists of Constitution-class starships at least one of them(the U.S.S. Eagle NCC-956)had a registry number lower than 1000.
     
    Tuskin38 likes this.
  6. F. King Daniel

    F. King Daniel Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Location:
    A type 13 planet in it's final stage
    Real life contributors to NCC numbers:

    Rearranging limited decals of 1, 7, 0 and 1.
    Birthdays of JJ Abrams' relatives (Kelvin, Biddeford etc)
    Numbers related to ship names (Mayflower, Newton etc)
    Including part of someone's phone number (DS9's Defiant)
    Bryan Fuller's love of Halloween (Discovery)


    ...you're all giving this far too much thought.
     
  7. cooleddie74

    cooleddie74 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Location:
    The Warped Sector of the Demented Quadrant
    GET OUT.

    Either take TBBS seriously the way it was intended or begone with you, heretic!
     
    DaveyNY likes this.
  8. Christopher

    Christopher Writer Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2001
    And those numbers were chosen in the first place because they'd be easy to read onscreen, even from a distance or with a poor broadcast signal.
     
    XCV330 likes this.
  9. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    Yes, but every thing must have an in-universe explanation and rationale otherwise we strike!
     
  10. Tomalak

    Tomalak Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Location:
    Manchester
    There was at least one at Wolf 359 - you can see it out of Sisko's window in Emissary. I think there's even one in the background of the Sector 001 battle in First Contact too.

    Obviously Starfleet saw some use against the Borg!
     
  11. XCV330

    XCV330 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2017
    Location:
    XCV330
    the Oberth's built-in ability to explode upon demand, or prior to demand, or just whenever, makes them unpredictable crewed torpedoes against the Borg and therefore something even the Borg Queen cannot factor into strategy.
     
  12. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    Canonically, the only 'proof' that the Eagle is Constitution class is a diagram of several ships (all using a Constitution class silhouette), of which the Eagle was one. That doesn't necessarily mean that each ship was a Connie, just that that's the generic shape they used for the diagrams.

    The one they used in "Emissary" was a reuse of the damaged U.S.S. Vico from TNG. The First Contact model was a low-poly CGI model of the Oberth class that was only used for that movie.
     
  13. Tuskin38

    Tuskin38 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Wasn’t there also one in Generations?
     
    cooleddie74 likes this.
  14. cooleddie74

    cooleddie74 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Location:
    The Warped Sector of the Demented Quadrant
    ^
    Yep. One of the three starships that arrive at Veridian III to rescue the surviving crew of the Enterprise-D from the surface. It warps away with the Farragut and the Miranda-class starship in the closing moments of the film.
     
    saddestmoon and 137th Gebirg like this.
  15. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    The ironic thing about that shot was that the Oberth model had the name Pegasus and the Miranda had the name Saratoga from the last use of the models in TNG and DS9...two ships that had already been destroyed before that scene!
     
  16. cooleddie74

    cooleddie74 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Location:
    The Warped Sector of the Demented Quadrant
    I didn't know that!
     
  17. 137th Gebirg

    137th Gebirg Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2000
    Location:
    Go Lick The World!
    Me neither... Learn something new every day! :)

    Anyone know what they were supposed to be called? Memory Alpha lists them both as "unnamed" and only the Nebula-class Farragut was called-out.
     
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2018
  18. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    Yeah, officially they’re ‘unnamed’ since they couldn’t knowingly use the names that were actually printed on the models.
     
    saddestmoon likes this.
  19. 137th Gebirg

    137th Gebirg Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2000
    Location:
    Go Lick The World!
    Well, sure, I was just wondering if they were given names, like, in early drafts of the script or in the novelization or something. The miniatures were filmed in such a way that the viewer couldn't see the incorrect names clearly (intentionally, I'm sure, based on reasons previously assigned) so any other names could be designated without allowing much visual scrutiny.

    MA does give mention of the unnamed Oberth in Generations in some book:
    Curious if this name was based on any official source, or if a similar "soft canon" name was given to the Miranda.
     
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2018
  20. cooleddie74

    cooleddie74 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Location:
    The Warped Sector of the Demented Quadrant
    I could be mistaken but when we see the Hood rendezvous with the Enterprise-D in "Encounter at Farpoint, Part I(TNG)" it may literally be the Excelsior shooting model from the two most recent films with the NX-2000 registry still on the hull, but the model was shot at an angle where the movie registry wasn't legible.