• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Starship design history in light of Discovery

Well we have no idea if Fuller planned on bringing in the Enterprise.

Eaves didn’t start designing it until mid last year IIRC. Months after both the Shenzhou and Discovery.
 
The original Planet of the Titans concept art was bronze, I'm guessing he liked the colour as well as the general shape.
 
USS Europa eaglemoss model
1.png
 
The bridge location on that one annoys me.

Once you start cutting slices into the saucer sections and moving bridge modules around onto wings and pylons and whatnot, you're dangerously close to designing ships that don't look like they come from Star Trek at all.
 
Only one row of portholes, and those in a decklet that is extremely unlikely to be a standalone, stand-upright feature. So the suggested scale of less than 400 m could well hold true, but basically everything else is okay, too.

Lots of prominent seams. For all we know, the entire roll bar takes off and flies away to do X (say, dip into atmosphetes w/ those wings), hence the extra nacelles and the impulse engines and the bridge-with-windshield there.

Out of the lot (and excluding the far background Magee), this one actually has the most solid shapes, resembling what came before in the days of plastic and balsa. Even the Shepard has flimsy bits and greeblies.

Timo Saloniemi
 
...A recovery tug, considering the role she played in the ep? ;) Admirals ITRW have commanded from less likely platforms.

The saucer cuts would be a "runway" or "launch rail"; the blue bits, docking aids...

Timo Saloniemi
 
1.png


Speaking of the cut-outs..... .....why have a saucer at all, if you are going to make sections perhaps too thin to cross between easily? What would be the point of having those two normal segments of saucer continue on afterwards at the sides? Why not end the saucer in a square edge? If the cut-outs are what many people think their are, basically there just for style... they might invalidate the purpose of having a saucer; i.e. a radial circular habitation/work area stretching from one central point. That is what starts to bug people subconsciously when you make designs too busy perhaps. Maybe the indent is not as thin as it appears, or is actually a launch deck like Timo says, but no other ship have needed a launching area, just a door.

Zgf3kgk.jpg


Overall, I don't mind the USS Europa, but like many people say, it would look better post-Undiscovered Country, or post-Nemesis. But ignoring all that, because I doubt casual audiences care, maybe the bigger issue is that the saucer being just a "normal unadorned saucer" would have been much more era-appropriate by subconscious association with the Constitution-class, like the Kelvin timeline ships of this era, like the USS Kelvin, which looks very very TOS/TMP, because of it's comparatively unadorned Franz Joseph look. Imagine how TOS-like it would have looked with round nacelles and a flat saucer, but otherwise unchanged.
 
Last edited:
I think using TOS-appropriate pennant art would already have been a big improvement.

As for cutouts vs. unbroken circles, the interiors of Kirk's ship seldom seemed to make much of the circular setup. Sharp corners formed a maze, there being no hub/spokes/ringways feel to the movements of our heroes.

The outside being a saucer would probably be the in-universe criterion, then. Although what use this could be when all these saucers have so much fancy stuff jutting out of them, encasing them or obscuring them, it's difficult to understand. Perhaps saucers are just easy to manufacture for some reason?

Timo Saloniemi
 
The bussard's are domes, so I'm fine with the nacelles. They could be a half way point between the Round Connie nacelles and the Flat TMP era nacelles.

I wish the majority of the Starfleet ships in Discovery looked closer to this.
4SzKCon.jpg
Too much greeble.

I'd rather they look more like the DSC Connie.
 
1.png


Speaking of the cut-outs..... .....why have a saucer at all, if you are going to make sections perhaps too thin to cross between easily? What would be the point of having those two normal segments of saucer continue on afterwards at the sides? Why not end the saucer in a square edge? If the cut-outs are what many people think their are, basically there just for style... they might invalidate the purpose of having a saucer; i.e. a radial circular habitation/work area stretching from one central point. That is what starts to bug people subconsciously when you make designs too busy perhaps. Maybe the indent is not as thin as it appears, or is actually a launch deck like Timo says, but no other ship have needed a launching area, just a door.

Zgf3kgk.jpg


Overall, I don't mind the USS Europa, but like many people say, it would look better post-Undiscovered Country, or post-Nemesis. But ignoring all that, because I doubt casual audiences care, maybe the bigger issue is that the saucer being just a "normal unadorned saucer" would have been much more era-appropriate by subconscious association with the Constitution-class, like the Kelvin timeline ships of this era, like the USS Kelvin, which looks very very TOS/TMP, because of it's comparatively unadorned Franz Joseph look. Imagine how TOS-like it would have looked with round nacelles and a flat saucer, but otherwise unchanged.
The two areas you've highlighted could possibly be used for water storage or just where a lot of internal machinery is placed.
I kinda-sorta assume that all the connecting parts are either at least one deck thick or have Jefferies-tubes running through them.
:techman:
 
The bussard's are domes, so I'm fine with the nacelles. They could be a half way point between the Round Connie nacelles and the Flat TMP era nacelles.


Too much greeble.

I'd rather they look more like the DSC Connie.
I agree. Just lop off those raised square segments and it would be just right.
 
I think using TOS-appropriate pennant art would already have been a big improvement.
none of the discovery ships seem to use the same pennant. shenzhou uses pennants (almost?) identical to the ones on the USS franklin in star trek beyond, the kerala has what looks like 24th century-style pennants without the starfleet insignia, europa has an altogether different design more reminiscent of TMP-style, discovery doesn't even have pennants.

oh also, have we also discussed the bussards? they appear to be blue on ships like discovery and europa, red on the kerala and enterprise, yellow on the hoover class, white on the magee class...

starfleet's shipbuilders were clearly having an identity crisis in the mid-23rd century in the "prime universe".
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top