• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

StarKiller {SPOILER}

Otherwise all those crashed Star Destroyers and Super Star Destroyers would have obliterated all life on the planets they crashed into (if not the world itself). Yet they didn't even make so much as a notable crater. It also helps explain why their antigrav technology is so powerful and reliable.

I didn't get the impression those Star Destroyers had crashed. If they had they shouldn't be as intact as they are. It would have to have been a controlled landing. If it had been an actual crash, not only would there be the huge crater you speak of, the Destroyers themselves would only be debris scattered all over the desert.

I've no idea what happens in Battlefront or how canon it is but the impression I got was the imperial fleet was scuttled shortly after the Battle of Endor.
 
Jakku was a year after Endor and the last major battle of the war. Some Imperial ships were scuttled to prevent capture, but a lot of others were just shot out of the sky.

Following this and the treaty, the Empire was at least partially disarmed (likely to help pay reparations). With only some of the fleet heading out to the Unknown Regions to become the First Order. The last functional Super Star Destroyer in Imperial service was destroyed at Jakku. We see its remains up close and personal as Rey flying thought it to get rid of that last TIE fighter.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Star Wars Undercover Boss: Starkiller Base - SNL

:lol:
 
The last functional Super Star Destroyer in Imperial service was destroyed at Jakku. We see its remains up close and personal as Rey flying thought it to get rid of that last TIE fighter.

The crashed ship (the Inflictor) wasn't a Super Star Destroyer. It was only a "regular" one.
 
Star Wars: Battlefront shows it crashing in the distance and it it is indeed a SSD, it comes down on it's starboard side and flops.

There are a lot of regular Star Destroyers that look like they came in at a shallow angle and crashed.

The game depicts Star Destroyers and Rebellion ships only a few hundred feet up battling inside atmospheres, Jakku is one of the few that had so many being downed creating the "Graveyard of Giants".
 
It also helps explain why their antigrav technology is so powerful and reliable.

The Umbarans seemed to have true antigravity with their craft--repulsor lift for nap-of-the-earth. I liked it when large ships could't hover--that made the Victory a big deal to enter an atmosphere--like the NuBSG.

Then we got hovering wedges in the prequels.
 
Star Wars: Battlefront shows it crashing in the distance and it it is indeed a SSD, it comes down on it's starboard side and flops.

No, the Inflictor is NOT a Super Star Destroyer. It's a "regular" destroyer, of the Imperial-class. You can tell because of the conning tower, which SSD's don't have.
 
The Inflictor is a Imperial Star Destroyer. That is the one we see Rey salvaging parts from at our first meeting.

The Super Star Destroyer is the Ravager. It is seen later, upside-down, as they try to lose the last TIE Fighter by diving inside it.

More than one Star Destroyer crashed that day. We saw multiple wrecks.
 
It seemed like only one was visible in the movie, but I could be remembering incorrectly.
That sounds like a good reason to go watch it again. :mallory:

Kor
 
If this is what knocked you over the edge on SW physics (to say nothing of JJ) then I don't know what to tell you.
Pretty much this. The one thing I can conclude from Star Wars is that space has it's own atmosphere. That is the only way to explain the sound in space, explosions in space, and ships that bank instead of rotating on their axis without changing their vectors.
 
It's as viable as people even speaking the exact same language in the exact same form thousands of years later.

Kor
 
I didn't get the impression those Star Destroyers had crashed. If they had they shouldn't be as intact as they are. It would have to have been a controlled landing. If it had been an actual crash, not only would there be the huge crater you speak of, the Destroyers themselves would only be debris scattered all over the desert.

If any ship that isn't designed to land (which surely applies to ships as massive as Star Destroyers), actually has landed, it's probably safe to assume it crashed.
 
Boats aren't designed to go on land, yet you can beach a boat without crashing it. Is there an equivalent term for spacecraft?
 
And the battle happend approximately 30 years ago, perhaps there were big sandstorms who covered up the crater?
 
Boats aren't designed to go on land, yet you can beach a boat without crashing it. Is there an equivalent term for spacecraft?
"Landing." The space shuttle used to do it quite regularly, as did Luke's X-Wing and the Millenium Falcon.
 
No, the Inflictor is NOT a Super Star Destroyer. It's a "regular" destroyer, of the Imperial-class. You can tell because of the conning tower, which SSD's don't have.
Bit of a moot point now, but the SSD's do indeed have the conning tower, it's just proportionally much smaller compared to the rest of the ship. Observe.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top