• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Starfleet Academy, take two

'Yes, cheapjack, you are completely right about TNG's, DS9's and Voyager's take on 20th Century capitalism and Gene Roddenberry is presently smiling down, graciously, with his wings on.'

:shifty::shifty::shifty:
As usual, nobody said that. Or anything remotely like that.

But, you have no reply to the fact that the Ferengi were the butt of all jokes in TNG,DS9 and Voyager, as people here should be, who say that 20th Century Capitalism exists in the 24th Century ST universe.
 
Last edited:
I always figured that Mess Nights (known as Dining-Ins to the Air Force and I believe the Army) were common at SFA - both to teach the cadets basic etiquette and to teach them the customs of the service, pass on "institutional heritage", etc. I would have included them in my writeup, but it wasn't til I reread my Honor Harrington books that it struck me.

Probably not the most fun things for most cadets, but the knowledge can come in handy.

Similarly, Mess Nights are probably not unheard of in the Fleet - not that they're common, but they do happen.

For the record, though:

While SF has prohibitions against "excessive familiarity" between officers and enlisted, I always got the feeling that there wasn't that heavy a barrier between officers and enlisted out in the Fleet. There is in the training base (SFA, for example), and there's some of it on starbases and planetside establishments, but not aboard operational starships. There just doesn't seem to be the space for separate messes for officers and enlisted, for example. (Though I will say that I'm not sure I like the idea of there not being a separate wardroom for the senior officers, we've never seen a Trek ship that had one.)
 
But, you have no reply to the fact that the Ferengi were the butt of all jokes in TNG,DS9 and Voyager, as people here should be, who say that 20th Century Capitalism exists in the 24th Century ST universe.
Actually, I do: Cookie Monster is funny. That doesn't mean eating is bad.

The Ferengi, especially as depicted on TNG, were not exibiting the traits of 20th century capitalism, they were a parody of it. They exaggerated all of its negative qualities and seemed to have none of its positive ones. And even that isn't a good fit: they are much more like 19th or 18th century capitalists (or rather, a parody thereof).

And you need to drop the "20th Century" from your posts. I'm pretty sure nobody is suggesting that the economic mode for the Federation is identical to the one in current use, just that it is still capitalism, and recognizable as such.
Just as, of course, nobody more than 110 years ago had "20th century capitalism" as their economic system: by definition, that is an artifact of the 20th century. Strictly speaking, we don't even have it now: we have had 21st century capitalism for a few years now. That does not change the fact that the economic system in use in many places has been recognizably capitalist for centuries or millennia now.
 
But, you have no reply to the fact that the Ferengi were the butt of all jokes in TNG,DS9 and Voyager, as people here should be, who say that 20th Century Capitalism exists in the 24th Century ST universe.
Actually, I do: Cookie Monster is funny. That doesn't mean eating is bad.

The Ferengi, especially as depicted on TNG, were not exibiting the traits of 20th century capitalism, they were a parody of it. They exaggerated all of its negative qualities and seemed to have none of its positive ones. And even that isn't a good fit: they are much more like 19th or 18th century capitalists (or rather, a parody thereof).

And you need to drop the "20th Century" from your posts. I'm pretty sure nobody is suggesting that the economic mode for the Federation is identical to the one in current use, just that it is still capitalism, and recognizable as such.
Just as, of course, nobody more than 110 years ago had "20th century capitalism" as their economic system: by definition, that is an artifact of the 20th century. Strictly speaking, we don't even have it now: we have had 21st century capitalism for a few years now. That does not change the fact that the economic system in use in many places has been recognizably capitalist for centuries or millennia now.

SpyOne,

You know perfectly well that in Little Green Men, Quark said that the 20th Century people were nothing like 24th people and were even worse than the Ferengi. He said they were greedier and more aquisitive and was amazed that you could even sell them poison!

In 'The Search', Quark also said that the Ferengi reminded humans of their former selves and were, in fact even worse at one point.

Federation capitalism is only like the capitalism of today, (dare I say 20thC capitalism?) in that they trade credits for the big things and with some races. But it has been quite clearly stated in First Contact, that they don't live for the aquisition of it, they way we do. It is not the driving force of their society, the way it is now. They don't need to. They'[re satiated on the basics. It is BEYOND capitalism and socialism, a completely different system, but, strangely, the ultimate dream of both. There'll still be power structures and those that seek power and 'old money', there may even be royalty, Vonda Mcintyre's Enterprise book said there was. But, people will be a hell of a lot free-er and more independent than they are today, they will be like our millionaires, in that respect.

As to the positives of capitalism, it HAS delivered a higher standard of living in the West, but it has nearly wiped us out as a species, I think that nearly cancels it out.

And, the cookie monster isn't the bad guy. The Ferengi were.
 
Last edited:
Bearing in mind that you yourself called the Ferengi "the butt of all jokes", are you now suggesting that Quark is an expert on human nature?
Isn't it more likely that it was intended that he misunderstood both Starfleet humans and those of the late 1940s US? That it was supposed to be a joke?

The Ferengi aren't the bad guys, they are the comic relief.

And you seem to be confusing capitalism with greed.
Yes, the Federation has done away with poverty: everybody gets what they need to survive. And acquisitiveness is not the driving force of their lives: they have what they need, so they can do what they love and not worry about starving.
None of that rules out the idea that they are compensated for the labor they actually do, that said compensation would be in the form of money of some kind, or that said compensation could then be used to acquire things they merely desire, as opposed to need.
There is on-screen evidence that there are still corporations, private land ownership, and that Starfleet personnel acquire goods through a process they describe as "purchase".
Whatever system they have looks sufficiently like capitalism to me.

And even if I stipulate that we, as a species, have been "nearly wiped out" by anything, I bet it is commercialism or greed or something else, not capitalism. Modern man is host to a plethora of destructive sins, but capitalism isn't among them.
 
Last edited:
Bearing in mind that you yourself called the Ferengi "the butt of all jokes", are you now suggesting that Quark is an expert on human nature?
Isn't it more likely that it was intended that he misunderstood both Starfleet humans and those of the late 1940s US? That it was supposed to be a joke?

The Ferengi aren't the bad guys, they are the comic relief.

And you seem to be confusing capitalism with greed.
Yes, the Federation has done away with poverty: everybody gets what they need to survive. And acquisitiveness is not the driving force of their lives: they have what they need, so they can do what they love and not worry about starving.
None of that rules out the idea that they are compensated for the labor they actually do, that said compensation would be in the form of money of some kind, or that said compensation could then be used to acquire things they merely desire, as opposed to need.
There is on-screen evidence that there are still corporations, private land ownership, and that Starfleet personnel acquire goods through a process they describe as "purchase".
Whatever system they have looks sufficiently like capitalism to me.

And even if I stipulate that we, as a species, have been "nearly wiped out" by anything, I bet it is commercialism or greed or something else, not capitalism. Modern man is host to a plethora of destructive sins, but capitalism isn't among them.

Spy, capitalism is driven by greed. The desire to create as much personal profit as possible. It has given us cheap products, like the Model T Ford, I admit and cheap food, but it has a lot to answer for. As a matter of fact, we have company's in England now, who only make enough profit to cover themselves, the way nature only makes enough to get by on, and they are seen as progressive companies and the way of the future.

Quark is the rogue of DS9. A likeable rogue,but a rogue nonetheless. He is greedy,selfish,aquisitive. He lives by the rules of aquisition. He knows the price of everything and the value of nothing. He thinks money is the answer to everything. He can't imagine a world without money. He has a brother who can and he thinks he is an idiot. Remind you of any type of people?

Quark did say in the Search that humans were at one point, worse than the Ferengi. And, I think his point about selling humans poison in LGM just sums up what is laughable about the 20thC and where we need to go on from.

Quark redeems himself in DS9 in those episodes when he can see beyond this and evolves. He becomes less selfish and materialistic and becomes a better person, in the moral of the episode.

I think you will still be compensated for labour, but I don't think you will be a wage slave, unless you work for the Ferengi. You will be able to tell your boss go stuff it a lot easier in the 24th Century and do something else.

Federation people only carry money, the way 19th ships used to carry beads and trinkets, in order to deal with the natives. But gold and silver and diamonds will be just beads and trinkets to 24th Century people.

Capitalism is just a system. It is just the step to something else. Something will come along and change the system, as steam engines and fire and iron have.

This is Science fiction we are talking about. It's about imagining better systems, different ways of going on. Star Trek has gone backwards and come to a complete stop recently. It seems to be just about 20th/21st century people 400 years down the line with better ways of killing people, going round inflicting 20th21st century values on people.

Science fiction is supposed to be slightly weird, slightly strange, slightly unsettling, slightly different, but about HUMANS in the FUTURE. But you are supposed to want to know what it is all about and get the hang of it so YOU can have a stake in the future.

I know you are going to come back and say that capitalism has been around for centuries, and we are just going to have a different form of it in the 24th, but did aborigines have capitalism? Have they survived for centuries? Did Tibetan monks? No, it's just a system, not a universal constant.
 
Last edited:
Spy, capitalism is driven by greed.
Only if you use the same definition of "greed" as Gordon Gecko: the desire for more. A more normal definition includes the word "excessive", as in "an excessive desire for more". That is not an integral part of capitalism, it is an unfortunate side-effect of human frailty.

Were you agreeing with me that Quark was intended to be a comic figure, or maintaining that he is an expert on human nature? Do you not agree that Quark's knowing "the price of everything and the value of nothing" makes him likely to misjudge the situations around him? If Quark offered Sisko a bribe and Sisko did not take it, would Quark conclude that Sisko couldn't be bribed, or that he hadn't offered enough money? Would he be right?
Quark sees everything as a commercial transaction. This often causes him to misunderstand things happening around him.

That Quark has some similar traits to real people just reinforces what I said: he is a parody. He wouldn't be funny if he didn't slightly resemble people. Like cookie monster, he has certain traits exaggerated to the point where he is comic.

And for the record, Quark in Little Green Men didn't say anything about selling humans poison: he took a little information from Nog about drugs (tobacco in particular) and concluded that the humans of that era were selling poison to each other, and said "If they'll buy poison, they'll buy anything." The joke here being both about how much our society has changed in a few decades and how much Quark misunderstands due to his limited knowledge and his seeing everything through the lens of his greed.

I think you will still be compensated for labour, but I don't think you will be a wage slave, unless you work for the Ferengi. You will be able to tell your boss go stuff it a lot easier in the 24th Century and do something else.
So you agree with me.

Federation people only carry money, the way 19th ships used to carry beads and trinkets, in order to deal with the natives.
So the compensation I receive for my labor can only be exchanged for things from aliens?
This doesn't fit with canon: Risa is part of the Federation, and "the Horga'hn is the Risan symbol of sexuality", yet Picard clearly says of the Horga'hn Riker apparently asked him to retrieve from Risa "I just purchased that." (emphasis mine)

I know you are going to come back and say that capitalism has been around for centuries, and we are just going to have a different form of it in the 24th, but did aborigines have capitalism? Have they survived for centuries? Did Tibetan monks? No, it's just a system, not a universal constant.
Did the aborigines or Tibetan monks have flush toilets? Does their having gotten along "just fine" without them mean that flush toilets are somehow evil? That we should shun them?
Does the fact that they are using them now suggest that they felt having them was better than the way things were before?
The fact that capitalism has been around for a long time was only brought up to rebut your assertion that it was a recent phenomenon, which was probably meant to justify the idea that it would not last for much longer although you never made that connection yourself. Rather than admit you were wrong about that, you now insist that it having been around for millennia in some recognizable form is irrelevant to the current discussion because not every human culture has embraced it for that long.
I will grant that it is possible that, like the Tibetans and flush toilets, we will contact an alien race that has an economic system that is unlike anything we have thought of, and that said system so obviously improves the lives of the people who live under it that we adopt it planet-wide. That is not, however, the situation shown in Star Trek. The system shown there is one that any ancient Roman would recognize: citizens have their basic needs attended to, and can work to earn the ability to purchase things they desire beyond their basic needs.
 
Spy, capitalism is driven by greed.
Only if you use the same definition of "greed" as Gordon Gecko: the desire for more. A more normal definition includes the word "excessive", as in "an excessive desire for more". That is not an integral part of capitalism, it is an unfortunate side-effect of human frailty.

Were you agreeing with me that Quark was intended to be a comic figure, or maintaining that he is an expert on human nature? Do you not agree that Quark's knowing "the price of everything and the value of nothing" makes him likely to misjudge the situations around him? If Quark offered Sisko a bribe and Sisko did not take it, would Quark conclude that Sisko couldn't be bribed, or that he hadn't offered enough money? Would he be right?
Quark sees everything as a commercial transaction. This often causes him to misunderstand things happening around him.

That Quark has some similar traits to real people just reinforces what I said: he is a parody. He wouldn't be funny if he didn't slightly resemble people. Like cookie monster, he has certain traits exaggerated to the point where he is comic.

And for the record, Quark in Little Green Men didn't say anything about selling humans poison: he took a little information from Nog about drugs (tobacco in particular) and concluded that the humans of that era were selling poison to each other, and said "If they'll buy poison, they'll buy anything." The joke here being both about how much our society has changed in a few decades and how much Quark misunderstands due to his limited knowledge and his seeing everything through the lens of his greed.

I think you will still be compensated for labour, but I don't think you will be a wage slave, unless you work for the Ferengi. You will be able to tell your boss go stuff it a lot easier in the 24th Century and do something else.
So you agree with me.

Federation people only carry money, the way 19th ships used to carry beads and trinkets, in order to deal with the natives.
So the compensation I receive for my labor can only be exchanged for things from aliens?
This doesn't fit with canon: Risa is part of the Federation, and "the Horga'hn is the Risan symbol of sexuality", yet Picard clearly says of the Horga'hn Riker apparently asked him to retrieve from Risa "I just purchased that." (emphasis mine)

I know you are going to come back and say that capitalism has been around for centuries, and we are just going to have a different form of it in the 24th, but did aborigines have capitalism? Have they survived for centuries? Did Tibetan monks? No, it's just a system, not a universal constant.
Did the aborigines or Tibetan monks have flush toilets? Does their having gotten along "just fine" without them mean that flush toilets are somehow evil? That we should shun them?
Does the fact that they are using them now suggest that they felt having them was better than the way things were before?
The fact that capitalism has been around for a long time was only brought up to rebut your assertion that it was a recent phenomenon, which was probably meant to justify the idea that it would not last for much longer although you never made that connection yourself. Rather than admit you were wrong about that, you now insist that it having been around for millennia in some recognizable form is irrelevant to the current discussion because not every human culture has embraced it for that long.
I will grant that it is possible that, like the Tibetans and flush toilets, we will contact an alien race that has an economic system that is unlike anything we have thought of, and that said system so obviously improves the lives of the people who live under it that we adopt it planet-wide. That is not, however, the situation shown in Star Trek. The system shown there is one that any ancient Roman would recognize: citizens have their basic needs attended to, and can work to earn the ability to purchase things they desire beyond their basic needs.

Spy,

You are coming round to my viewpoint, but not admitting it. The profit motive defines capitalism, the desire to make as much for yourself. It has given us the 99p beefburger, but it has also given us cigarettes, global warmimg and people working their whole lives doing something useful to have one cruise ship holiday at the end of it when they are practically senile.

And the Federation has evolved beyond capitalism as we know it. There must have been a 100 ST episodes with the Fernengi in them. In very single one, the Ferengi were depicted as being less evolved than the Feds and with a system that did not deliver as high or as ethical standard of living. In every single one. They were not the comic relief, they were a joke and frequently the bad guys. You may not like that, but that's the way it is. And, I say again, they were compared to 19th Century capitalists and 20th Century capitalists in three ST episodes. Look at 'The Search' again, Quark quite clearly states that humans don't like the Ferengi, because the remind them of the way humans were, and Quark says they were worse! And LGM is all about how the 20thC humans are just like the Ferengi, it wasn't just a bit of comic relief, it was the whole point of the episode ! Apart from the Roswell bit. I have siad that capitalism hasn't alway been around, we once bartered and before that, we stole. And up until the 19th Century, Aborigines didn't have it at all, and they are human and intelligent and successful.

At least you are now saying that you will get the basics in TNG world, and that will be a lot more than you get now, which stands to reason, as their standard of living will be much higher, as it will be, if things keep going the way they are, 400 years down the line.

And the Romans has slavery, which is something even they felt guilty about and something Quark said was wrong and unferengi like. And the Romans were very greedy people, which Picard has said TNG humans aren't.

To clarify my idea of a what you would get, in the 24th century, instead of money, you would just get a pass, an account, with clearance to to certain things. At age 18, after being educated, which you would want,you would be called into a meeting, and you would be asked' What are you going to do with your life? What's your plan?' If you said'Well I'm planning to get smashed on synthehol every day', your pass would be restricted, and you would just get enough clearance to do that, until you came up with a plan. you might find it difficult to reproduce, on your clearance,as you would be a bad example. You might decide you want to make chairs, as ex president Carter does. Hand made things would be liked in the 24th Century. There may be some monetary credit on this account, to get you off planet things, but this whole idea of unitary pieces of money that people sweat for and worship to amass, and which everything, even human sex, is measured in units of, would go the way of the chicken and the goat as a means of barter. People would be given clearance based on what they are going to do to contribute to humanity, as Picard has said they live for. That will be the big difference between us and them. We live primarily for our own gain, secondarily for humanity's, though some of us have no concept of that. With them, it's the other way round, cos they KNOW they have the basics, and will always get them, as we don't.

The principle of TNG is that humans have changed. They have evolved, because of technology. They are not the same as the Romans, they not the same as us. They still have the savage within, they could still regress, there is a piece of all of us in them, but they are more refined and more evolved. This is the bedrock of ST and is repeated over and over again in all it 700 episodes. And they don't have capitalism as we know it. Sorry, but they don't. Just because they sometimes use money, doesn't mean they do.They can DEAL with people, like Harry Mudd, that do trade the currency, just as we can still swim, and all of us can do it, but we're not an aquatic species. Those three 20th Century humans in the Neutral Zone accepted it and took the cold bath and came up spluttering and coughing, but they learned to cope in the 24thC.
 
Last edited:
Weapons Training

Perhaps as early as midshipman's boot camp, cadets will receive basic weapons training. In a classroom environment, after a lecture on proper handling of weapons in general, petty officers will move through the room and on each desk top will place in front of the midshipman a hand phaser.

In the peaceful (usually) world of the 24th century, for some of the young people this will be the first time they have ever been in the presents of a actual deadly weapon. What's on the deck top in front of them isn't a mock-up, while the powerpack is discharged the phaser is real. What follows is their hands on training and qualifications in the operation and firing of a phaser, after the classroom session the midshipmen will be taken to a outdoor firing range, provided with charged phasers and allowed to fire on holographic targets. At first the holograms are simple bullseyes, later the targets will be humanoid looking so the midshipmen won't be hesitant the first time they fire the phaser in the line of duty.

At some point during their four years at the academy each midshipman will, in a controlled situation, be stunned. Just so they fully understand the experience.

----
 
Agreed re weapons training. I see it happening as early as Plebe Summer (the boot camp referred to, before their first year at the Academy).

The way I see it, every SFA cadet trains on phaser pistols and rifles, plus those weird palm phasers from early TNG. Training is likely in accuracy as much as speed, especially if phasers are pulse weapons rather than beams (the series are contradictory on this, we've seen both on screen.) The 'everybody gets stunned' thing is a great idea.

Security/Marine cadets probably train with a wider variety of weapons, including photon grenades and heavy weapons. Cadets who take "Advanced Ground Tactics" also likely train with these weapons, regardless of their specialty.

The one point where I disagree is the firing range being outside - because I forget whether holograms in Trek can display properly outdoors as opposed to in an enclosed space.

One thing: In the 24th/25th century, it might be quite the task to train cadets in being properly aggressive as opposed to being passive with physical combat.
 
One thing: In the 24th/25th century, it might be quite the task to train cadets in being properly aggressive as opposed to being passive with physical combat.
I agree, the reason I said that the midshipmen would start with a bullseye and work up to a humanoid shape is just this. SFA will have four years to bring them around, like it or not Starfleet officers will occasionally have to perform acts of violence. If at some point there is a midshipman who psychologically simply can't be aggressive in the correct circumstances they would most likely walk him to the gate.

This wouldn't be the case with all midshipmen, they're going to be coming from a lot of different races and cultures. Not all humans even will come from cultures of total non-violence. In one of the novel, a teenage Uhura hunted and killed a loin using only a spear as part of a Maasai warrior right of passage, she was lightly injured in the process. The loin was a animatronic, but Uhura's culture was still practicing that aspect of their traditions.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top