• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

News Starfleet Academy Coming to P+

You really think they're gonna stick to those core Trek ideas? DISCO was all over the place, and it barely scratched the surface of what Star Trek is about. Classic Trek is exploration, diplomacy, and deep stories, but DISCO? Pfft, hardly!

Our campaign violating IDIC? Please. We just want Starfleet Academy to be the real deal, not some watered-down version of Trek that'll disappoint all of us. We're not against change, but let's not forget what made Star Trek awesome in the first place.

#StopLuveStupis is here to stir things up and make sure the new show doesn't drop the ball



DISCO had some cool moments with the Romulans and Vulcans reunifying and all that jazz, but it's so in-your-face about it that it becomes annoying. Star Trek used to be subtle, man! It tackled important issues without being so over-the-top and preachy.

Classic Trek was about exploration and diplomacy, not just throwing together a bunch of diverse characters and calling it a day. It's like they're just ticking boxes instead of focusing on what made Star Trek great in the first place.

So yeah, #StopLuveStupis is here to call out DISCO and make sure the new Starfleet Academy show doesn't follow the same path. We want our Trek back...
We? It’s just you.
 
So the real question this show must answer: what do 32nd century Klingons look like?
I imagine they will continue with the Klingorc design but perhaps a little toned down. If it's the 32nd century it won't impact any other Trek series made so doesn't really matter at this stage. SNW and any 25th century set series will likely have the traditional Worf type design.
 
When we're talkin' about the "ideas" and "principles" at the core of our "Stop Luve Stupis" campaign, we mean those classic Star Trek values that we've loved since the very beginning. Stuff like:

  1. Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations (IDIC): Embracing all kinds of folks and ideas from different cultures, species, you name it. No IDIC in the 32nd!
  2. The Prime Directive: That rule about not messing with other civilizations' growth and development. Vaguely absent in the 32nd.
  3. Exploration, diplomacy, and science: The heart and soul of Starfleet's adventures and what helps our favorite characters grow. Mediocre execution in the Discoverse.
  4. Stories that make ya think: Tackling real-world social and moral issues through awesome storytelling and character-driven episodes. Not happening in the Discoverse!
We're worried that the new Starfleet Academy show in the 32nd century during Discovery might not stick to these important principles. If they stray too far from what makes Star Trek great, it could hurt the franchise's legacy and impact on future fans.

I have my own issues with DISCO (mostly story, arc, and pacing), but let me try to address those 4 points you mention.

IDIC - While I certainly have issues with DISCO, celebrating IDIC and diversity is definitely NOT one of them. DISCO takes the top spot in terms of representation. IDIC is most certainly represented here.

Prime Directive - The Prime Directive has come up, and has been used as a main point a couple times. (Like in "New Eden") The strictly serial nature of the series makes it tricky to use the Prime Directive as a main plot point, but it isn't absent.

Exploration, diplomacy, science - I will agree that a lot of the science in the 32nd century seems more like magic than science, but I think that's a result of over a millennium of advances past where we are now. Think of Arthur C. Clarke's law. Diplomacy: we have a (mostly) unified Vulcan/Romulan society, we have an attempt to bring back the Federation with dialogue and assistance, and the season 4 threat ends with basically both parties mutually understanding each other through diplomacy. Exploration: I will admit, this is somewhat absent from the show but it's because each season is so strictly arc driven that it doesn't give any room to breathe and just explore. So I can't defend DISCO much on this one.

Stories that make you think - While there are a lot of episodes that can seem preachy or in your face, how's that any different than TNG with the seemingly endless preaching, particularly season 5? (And I am a big TNG fan... it's why I became a science fiction fan to begin with.)


In short, DISCO is definitely in the bottom end of ST shows for me, but it definitely has the spirit of STAR TREK in it, and is a good addition to the franchise.

And if even I can defend the show, the points you bring up don't really hold up well under scrutiny.
 
Stories that make ya think: Tackling real-world social and moral issues through awesome storytelling and character-driven episodes. Not happening in the Discoverse!
Yes, yes it is, as multiple posters have shared how Discovery has impacted them directly from the sharing of managing real world grief, trauma and loss.

We want our Trek back...
Don't speak for me, friend.
but it definitely has the spirit of STAR TREK in it, and is a good addition to the franchise.
1000% agree with all points raised. The idea that Discovery is not hitting "deep" like past Trek is pure nonsense. The same was thrown at the Kelvin Trek and shows a lack of willingness to pay attention, rather than a lack of depth on the part of the writers.
 
The problem with 32nd century is this--the most hype right now is around the 25th century. Picard, Lower Decks, and Prodigy are all set there. By keeping Discovery's later seasons in the prime timeline and setting another show in the 32nd century, the more they do in that show, the less options writers have in the 25th century.

This is also a problem for that other star franchise. Right now, Mandalorian is losing viewers and the show feels like it's just treading water until the sequel trilogy. It's not a position any show creatively should be in.
 
I don't think we have much to worry about.
E5u0H1c.jpeg
 
The problem with 32nd century is this--the most hype right now is around the 25th century. Picard, Lower Decks, and Prodigy are all set there. By keeping Discovery's later seasons in the prime timeline and setting another show in the 32nd century, the more they do in that show, the less options writers have in the 25th century.
I do believe, as many have argued, that restraints make for good art, not bad.
 
I do believe, as many have argued, that restraints make for good art, not bad.

ENT season 4 is a great example. Their budget was slashed in half. Their answer?

A season full of mini-arcs that helped spread episode costs evenly, and told great stories without dragging them out unnecessarily. (I'm looking at you, current era season long arcs.)
 
Exploration: I will admit, this is somewhat absent from the show but it's because each season is so strictly arc driven that it doesn't give any room to breathe and just explore. So I can't defend DISCO much on this one.
I think even within its narrower scope Discovery has done a decent job with exploration. There was the planet Pahvo in the first season, New Eden, the Sphere and visiting the mycelial universe in the second, the whole encounter with the 10-C in the fourth. Even the third was essentially exploring the future of the 32nd century and learning about what had come to be.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top