Okay.![]()
I think he was having a bit of fun with you.
Okay.![]()
At that point, I decided I would rate movies on how much they entertained me.
I know that ten years ago (has it already been that long?!), I had to take a serious step back after the release of Star Trek (2009). Star Trek is, by far, my favorite franchise and anyone that pays attention knows I'm still passionate about it (See: Discovery forum).
I went out of my way to make a total ass out of myself back then, a truly special ass. I had already seen the film twice, enjoying it immensely in the theater both times I had been. Though I would come here and get caught up in the "shitting on Roddenberry's grave", "OMG, the plot holes!!!" and other such non-sense. Even to the point I was arguing about a line about communications being down that I had somehow missed twice in the theater.
At that point, I decided I would rate movies on how much they entertained me.
I just don’t think getting sucked into plot holes is something that affects as many fans as is sometimes made out.
Entertainment entertaining? Perish the thought!
I agree, but these movies aren’t Hobbes and Shaw or something. That’s a movie that feels it was made for people to say ‘yeah, I turned my brain off and enjoyed it’. Star Wars isn’t some high concept movie, but it isn’t that either.
Yeah, I started taking the Roger Ebert approach some years ago, too. I remember when he started being more about the entertainment value than rigidly adhering to specific principles that no one else noticed. That doesn't mean just giving slipshod work a pass, but simply enjoying what is presented to you if it's done in good faith, and if you find it genuinely entertaining. That's how I approached the 2009 Star Trek film. As a result, I ended up loving the movie, and seeing it as a love note to the original series, and so I accepted that premise and took it for what it was. It's still one of my favorite films, and my (2nd) favorite Star Trek film.I know that ten years ago (has it already been that long?!), I had to take a serious step back after the release of Star Trek (2009). Star Trek is, by far, my favorite franchise and anyone that pays attention knows I'm still passionate about it (See: Discovery forum).
I went out of my way to make a total ass out of myself back then, a truly special ass. I had already seen the film twice, enjoying it immensely in the theater both times I had been. Though I would come here and get caught up in the "shitting on Roddenberry's grave", "OMG, the plot holes!!!" and other such non-sense. Even to the point I was arguing about a line about communications being down that I had somehow missed twice in the theater.
At that point, I decided I would rate movies on how much they entertained me.
Huh? That was Mustafar? Did he take the Sith tracker from Vader’s castle?Knowing that Ben is on Mustafar at the start of the film is completely unnecessary when it comes to the story being told.
I agree, but these movies aren’t Hobbes and Shaw or something.
I completely agree. And it sucks the fun out of it.Sometimes, I believe, people hold movies like these to too high of a standard.
Same here. I get a lot of sideways comments over it (not here) but that's my genuine move. No, I'm not going to compare the Star Wars movies. I'm not going to rate them (anymore). I'm going to note which ones I found entertaining and have the most rewatch value for me. And that's it.At that point, I decided I would rate movies on how much they entertained me.
Yeah, that. Because, if we keep taking this super serious (trademark pending) then eventually it will suck all the fun out of it...if we are not there already.We all have our thresholds of quality and I think we all could stand to work a little harder to accept contrary opinions with a little more acceptance.
What did @Campe98 say?
Yeah, that. Because, if we keep taking this super serious (trademark pending) then eventually it will suck all the fun out of it...if we are not there already.
Avengers; Endgame did the "all the heroes come to save the lone dude" better than this did. Endgame brought me to tears.
I don't even have the motivation to watch Endgame now!I was firmly asleep by that point in Endgame.![]()
It's a Star Wars story a couple of twelve-year-olds would dream up on the playground.
These modern Star Wars movie reviews. It’s either ‘you just need to turn off your brain and enjoy it’ or ‘you really need to see it a few times to appreciate everything.’
No, I don’t think so. As much as some people do hold these movies to unacceptably high standards
I think others take any Star Wars and try their best to like it simply because they love the franchise. So you get a lot of either ‘it’s too complicated’ or ‘people are taking it too seriously’, which are both handy little lines that somewhat sidestep whether or not the movie was actually good. And they do so in wildly dissimilar ways.
The only objective standard is the one that should be expected: the level of creative quality/integrity set by the original films. They are the ground zero--the creation point for everything--prequels and sequels. It only focuses on the series, leaving out comparisons to any non-Star Wars film, yet to some, that is somehow "unfair" or they feel the need to drag down films that earned their celebrated status in order to lift up the sequels. This forum has endless examples of that patently defensive and less than honest behavior, and it never sells.
They could only leave the planet's atmosphere with the tower that they destroyed. They destroyed the tower, and then the command ship before the ships were able to leave the atmosphere.I figured that was the case but didn't feel it was clear. If there was some dialog maybe I missed it but visually I found it didn't look right. It took me out of the moment because I was like "wait, wut?" for a minute.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.